the Conservative TAKE
Politics • Culture • News
The Survey That TRANSFORMED MAGA, Ushering in a New Freedom Maverick
post photo preview

In May 2024, the 1776 Law Center commissioned a groundbreaking poll that has the potential to reshape the future of the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement. Conducted by the reputable BIG DATA POLL, this survey used statistically validated methodologies and proprietary access to voter files to ensure a representative snapshot of the American electorate. Over 2,000 registered voters were interviewed nationwide from May 17 to May 24, 2024, using a mixed-mode approach that included online and phone interviews. The results, weighted for gender, age, race, ethnicity, education, geography, and region, provide a clear understanding of Middle America's priorities and could serve as a catalyst for a resurgence in the MAGA movement's influence and direction.

Medical Freedom: A Rallying Cry Against Government Overreach

One of the most striking findings of the poll was the overwhelming concern over medical freedom. Middle Americans, still reeling from the government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, expressed deep unease with what they perceive as an erosion of their autonomy in making personal health decisions. The survey revealed that 75% of Americans agree that "drug companies should not be immune from suit if their vaccines cause injuries," with 50% strongly agreeing. Support for ending Big Pharma's immunity for vaccine injuries is consistent across all demographics, ideologies, and regions, making it a unifying issue in a highly polarized environment.

This issue significantly impacts voter behavior, with 68% of respondents stating they would be more likely to support a candidate who advocates for holding drug companies accountable if vaccines cause injury. The poll also revealed widespread skepticism toward the COVID-19 vaccines, with less than half of the country (48%) believing they are safe and effective. This distrust is most pronounced among younger voters, minority groups, and swing voters—key demographics that will play a decisive role in the 2024 election. Notably, 30% of Americans reported that they or someone close to them suffered serious adverse reactions from the COVID-19 vaccine, highlighting the intensity of concern around this issue.

Food Freedom: Protecting America's Heartland

The poll also highlighted growing anxiety about food security and the role of federal regulations in agriculture. Middle Americans, particularly those in rural areas, voiced concerns about the sustainability of food supply chains and the impact of government policies on small farmers. Food Freedom has emerged as a top issue for voters in 2024, with massive support across ideologies, parties, regions, races, religions, incomes, and familial statuses. It is especially popular among voters certain to vote in 2024 and key swing voters, such as Independents who do not align with either party and those considering voting for Trump, Kennedy, or even a third party.

Support for Food Freedom is not only broad but also deep, with 58% of respondents more likely to support a candidate who backs the right to buy food directly from farmers without government permission. This issue resonates strongly with core MAGA supporters, who have long championed the interests of America’s heartland and the preservation of traditional values, including the importance of local food production and self-sufficiency. The survey revealed that 50% strongly agree that "Americans should be allowed to buy food directly from farmers without getting government permission," indicating that this issue could be a decisive factor for many voters in the upcoming election.

Political Freedom: Defending Constitutional Rights

Political freedom emerged as another critical issue, with respondents emphasizing the need to safeguard constitutional rights. The poll revealed significant concern over perceived threats to free speech, religious liberty, and the right to bear arms. Many Middle Americans feel that these fundamental freedoms are under attack, particularly in the face of increasing censorship and attempts to curtail individual liberties. This issue has always been at the core of the MAGA movement, which positions itself as a defender of the Constitution and the rights it guarantees. The poll’s findings suggest that these concerns will continue to drive the movement’s agenda, rallying supporters around the cause of protecting and preserving American freedoms.

Financial Freedom: Reclaiming Economic Independence

Economic issues also played a significant role in the poll, with respondents expressing deep frustration with inflation, taxation, and government spending. There is a strong sense that the federal government’s economic policies are contributing to financial instability and eroding the economic independence of everyday Americans. Middle Americans are increasingly supportive of non-fiat, decentralized stable currencies like Bitcoin, viewing them as a way to protect against inflation and government overreach. This growing interest in alternative currencies reflects a broader desire for fiscal conservatism, reduced government spending, and policies that promote self-reliance. This trend aligns with the MAGA movement’s emphasis on financial freedom, deregulation, and the empowerment of individuals over centralized government control.

A Turning Point for MAGA?

The findings of the 1776 Law Center poll could mark a turning point for the MAGA movement. As the movement looks to the future, these insights from Middle America offer a clear roadmap for reinvigorating its base and expanding its influence. By focusing on the issues that matter most to Middle Americans—medical, food, political, and financial freedoms—MAGA can reclaim its position as the voice of the forgotten men and women of the country.

This poll serves as a reminder that the principles of limited government, personal responsibility, and individual liberty are not only still relevant but are deeply cherished by a significant portion of the American populace. As MAGA leaders and candidates prepare for upcoming elections, they would do well to heed the message coming from Middle America: the fight for freedom is far from over, and the movement that once promised to make America great again may be poised to do so once more.

The Influence on Trump's Vision: A New Direction

The impact of this poll extends beyond general support for the movement. According to Robert Barnes of the "Barnes and Rich Baris People's Pundit" podcast, the 1776 Law Center poll was instrumental in altering Donald Trump’s views on Big Agriculture, Big Pharma, and the fiat dollar. Barnes noted that the overwhelming support among Middle Americans for greater independence from these powerful sectors resonated deeply with Trump, prompting him to reconsider and ultimately shift his stance on these issues. This change in perspective is not merely a strategic pivot but a reflection of Trump’s willingness to align his policies with the genuine concerns of his core supporters.

The Trump-RFK Jr. Alliance: A Partnership Rooted in Shared Values

Perhaps the most surprising outcome of this shift has been Trump’s interest in bringing Robert F. Kennedy Jr. onto his ticket. This potential partnership, driven by shared concerns about the influence of Big Pharma and government overreach, has generated significant enthusiasm among MAGA supporters and the broader public. RFK Jr., who was just 14 years old when his father was tragically assassinated, has long felt a duty to continue his family’s legacy of public service. His empathy, born of personal loss and a lifelong commitment to justice, resonates with voters who feel disconnected from the elites in Washington.

Contrary to popular narratives that paint this alliance as a quid pro quo relationship, insiders assert that it is an honest and innocent collaboration aimed at bettering the country. RFK Jr.'s reputation as a strong speaker and his alignment with the concerns highlighted in the 1776 Law Center poll make him a natural fit for Trump. Their partnership represents a convergence of shared values and goals, particularly in their mutual desire to challenge the status quo and restore power to the people.

Popular Support and the Path Forward

The Trump-RFK Jr. alliance has proven to be highly popular among both MAGA supporters and regular Middle Americans. The 1776 Law Center poll revealed a deep and widespread yearning for leaders who prioritize individual freedoms and resist the influence of powerful special interests. This partnership embodies those values, offering a vision of America that is free from the grip of Big Agriculture, Big Pharma, and financial manipulation.

In essence, this poll has the potential to change the course of MAGA by reinforcing its commitment to the core values that have always been at its heart. If the movement can successfully align its future policies with the priorities expressed in this poll, it could very well spark a new chapter in the ongoing quest to restore and preserve the freedoms that define the American experience. The Trump-RFK Jr. ticket may be the key to unlocking a new era of American politics, where the concerns of the people take precedence over the interests of the powerful, and the MAGA movement finds itself reinvigorated by a renewed focus on the issues that matter most to Middle America.

For more detailed survey results, you can visit the 1776 Law Center's surveys on Food Freedom and Medical Freedom.

community logo
Join the the Conservative TAKE Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Odds of Love: A Probability Study Proving Jasmine Crockett’s Race Baiting Ignores the Real Challenges of Finding a Conservative Black Match

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Representative Jasmine Crockett’s recent criticism of Representative Byron Donalds for marrying a white woman highlights a regressive mindset steeped in ignorance and racial bias, casting doubt on her ability to engage with the diverse realities of American life.

https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1906302926571618409

By implying that Donalds has been “whitewashed” through his interracial marriage, Crockett clings to outdated stereotypes that dictate racial loyalty over personal agency, exposing her own hypocrisy in advocating for equality while policing others’ private choices. This narrow perspective stands in stark contrast to the evolving dynamics of relationships across racial lines, as evidenced by a probabilistic analysis of partner selection among conservative Black individuals. To illustrate the complexity of such dynamics, consider the following study estimating the likelihood of a conservative Black man finding and marrying a conservative Black woman who aligns with his values—a scenario Crockett might deem more “acceptable,” yet one fraught with its own...

00:00:46
00:01:20
Biblical Citizenship in Modern America Commentary Ep14 - Understanding the Times 3

00:00 Introduction
02:03 Week 13 review
04:56 Our Current Education System
05:59 Six Verbs for Advancing Truth in the Country
09:08 What Our Elected Officials Don't Know About America
10:44 The Foundation of Law
12:12 Who Were the Signers of the Declaration of Independence?
13:52 Benjamin Rush
15:44 What is Patriotism?
18:34 Summary of Workbook

00:25:36

The OBBB Tax Cuts Will Apply to Our 2025 Income!

If the OBBB passes in 2025 (hopefully on July 4th), get ready:
🗓️ When you file your taxes by April 15, 2026, you’ll claim:

✅ No tax on tips
✅ Deductions for overtime
✅ Bigger child tax credits
✅ Special breaks for seniors (65+)
✅ No Social Security tax on select income

💰 All these apply to money earned in 2025. Plus this will show up on your 2026 tax return.

🚨 BUT.......... if OBBB doesn’t pass, Trump-era tax cuts expire... and your taxes could jump up to 60% depending on your income bracket.

DOGE Cuts Can Become LAW Immediately After OBBB Passes!

Feeling frustrated that the OBBB couldn’t just slash spending on the spot? You’re not alone and here’s the game-changer:

🔹 As soon as the OBBB passes, the DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) rescission can be submitted and turned into legally binding law right away.

Here’s how it works:

The President (via OMB) sends a rescission package (targeting watchdog-favorite targets like PBS, NPR, and foreign aid) to Congress.

That funding is frozen for 45 days under the Impoundment Control Act.

Congress votes—the Senate needs only a simple majority, no filibuster.

President signs it → These cuts become permanent law.

🔸 Case in point: The House already approved $9.4B in DOGE cuts

It heads to the Senate next.

In summary:

🔹 OBBB passes → DOGE rescission triggered → 45-day freeze → Senate vote (simple majority) → President signs → Cuts are law.
No OBBB veto power needed. No excuses. Let’s get it done.

post photo preview

PREDICTION: Trump will likely use the overwhelming success of the Midnight Hammer strikes (which sent shockwaves around the world, demonstrating America's ability to conventionally strike any target at will) and the exposed vulnerabilities of Russian air defenses as strategic leverage. By extending goodwill toward Zelensky, who now recognizes the value of U.S. systems like the Patriot missile, Trump can strengthen U.S.-Ukraine relations without committing to endless aid. This combined posture could pressure Putin into negotiations, opening a path to end the war on terms favorable to the United States. #MAGA

post photo preview
“51–49: Senate Clears Crucial Hurdle as Trump’s MAGA Agenda Holds Firm in One Big Beautiful Bill”

In a dramatic Saturday night showdown, the U.S. Senate voted 51–49 to proceed to debate on President Donald J. Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBBA) a sweeping reconciliation package that fulfills nearly every major promise of his 2024 campaign.

Despite procedural hurdles, internal party negotiations, and two GOP defections, the Senate version of the bill preserves the core MAGA agenda. It includes Trump’s historic tax cuts, border enforcement, energy deregulation, entitlement reform, and steps to rein in activist courts, all while avoiding tax hikes or expanding federal bureaucracy.

The Senate vote was a major win for Majority Leader John Thune and Vice President JD Vance, who helped secure key votes from GOP skeptics. While some provisions were adjusted, the essential structure and policy goals of the House-passed version remain firmly intact. Here’s a full breakdown of the key issues. See this article for the orginal breakdown.

Senate Adjustments: What Stayed, What Shifted

Policy AreaHouse VersionSenate Version (Post-Vote Draft)
Medicaid reforms to end fraud — no cuts to seniors/disabled✅ Work checks, eligibility verification only⚠️ Delayed provider tax cuts + new rural hospital fund
Child Tax Credit expansion✅ Enhanced support⚠️ Phase‑out tweaks for Senate rules
AI and judiciary protections✅ Limits federal overreach⚠️ Temporary Senate adjustments
Deficit reduction w/out tax increases✅ $1.6–$1.7 T in savings⚠️ Procedural holdouts over Medicaid — added rural‑hospital carve-out
 

Medicaid Reforms: Adjusted for Rural Stability, Not Rolled Back

The House version included targeted reforms: work requirements, address checks, and eligibility verification. These were all designed to root out abuse while protecting the elderly, disabled, and children.

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) objected to the bill’s provider tax reforms, claiming they could destabilize rural hospitals. In response, the Senate delayed those changes and added a new Rural Hospital Fund.

Core anti-fraud reforms remain.
⚠️ Funding mechanics adjusted to protect rural care without touching benefits.

Child Tax Credit: Still Expanded, Rule-Compliant

The House delivered a dramatic expansion of the child tax credit, boosting support for working families.

To meet reconciliation rules, the Senate version slightly adjusts income phase-out levels. These tweaks only impact higher earners and preserve the full benefit for middle-class families.

Benefit for families stays strong.
⚠️ Phase-outs altered to comply with Senate rules.

AI Preemption & Judicial Power: Tactically Modified

The House sought to block states from passing conflicting AI regulations for 10 years. This is a move aimed at ensuring national consistency and innovation freedom. It also included a “No Rogue Rulings” clause to limit judicial abuse of contempt powers.

The Senate removed these items due to Byrd Rule limitations but replaced them with a bond requirement for injunctions, which still targets judicial overreach in a procedurally valid way.

Goal of limiting rogue judicial power remains.
⚠️ Method revised to pass reconciliation review.

Deficit Reduction: Strong Savings Remain

The House version produced $1.6–$1.7 trillion in savings (without raising taxes) by rooting out inefficiencies in welfare and Medicaid.

Senate negotiators slightly trimmed short-term savings to win votes from Sens. Mike Lee, Ron Johnson, Rick Scott, and others by delaying some Medicaid cuts and funding rural hospitals.

Massive deficit savings preserved.
⚠️ Minor tweaks made for vote-counting and practical concerns.

Conclusion: The MAGA Agenda Remains Untouched

Despite intense negotiations and a narrow procedural margin, the Senate version of Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill delivers everything that matters:

  • Tax cuts made permanent

  • No tax on tips, overtime, or Social Security

  • Border wall funded without taxpayer burden

  • Energy independence restored

  • Medicaid reformed, not slashed

  • Deficit reduced—no new taxes

  • Judicial activism checked

These adjustments don’t weaken the bill, they refine it to clear procedural and political obstacles. And all unresolved conservative priorities (like AI preemption and judicial constraints) can still be reintroduced through separate appropriations or standalone legislation.

The final vote is expected this week, with a potential July 4 signing ceremony. If passed, it will mark one of the most comprehensive and successful legislative follow-throughs of any modern presidency.

The White House

 

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Recent Major Pro-Trump and Conservative Rulings

In the past two months (late April to June 2025), the U.S. judicial system has delivered several significant rulings that bolster policies and priorities aligned with President Donald Trump’s agenda or resonate with his conservative base. From curbing judicial overreach to advancing parental rights, religious freedom, and Second Amendment protections, these Supreme Court and federal court decisions reflect the influence of Trump’s judicial appointees and his administration’s focus on executive power, cultural conservatism, and government efficiency. Notably, cases involving LGBTQ+ issues and parental rights have emerged as key battlegrounds, with rulings reinforcing traditional values and state authority. Below is a comprehensive list of major pro-Trump rulings, including those addressing LGBTQ+ policies, parental rights, and other conservative priorities, drawn from recent legal developments.

  1. Trump v. CASA – Nationwide Injunctions (June 27, 2025)

    • Case Description: Challenged nationwide injunctions issued by lower courts blocking Trump’s executive order to restrict automatic birthright citizenship for children of non-citizens or undocumented immigrants.

    • Ruling: In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that federal district courts lack authority to issue universal (nationwide) injunctions against executive actions, partially staying injunctions from Maryland, Massachusetts, and Washington district courts. Justice Amy Coney Barrett authored the majority opinion, with liberal justices dissenting. The Court allowed the policy to proceed in jurisdictions not tied to named plaintiffs, remanding cases to lower courts to reassess injunction scope.

    • Impact: A major win for Trump, as it limits judicial ability to block his executive actions broadly, empowering policies like the birthright citizenship order and others (e.g., ending funding for sanctuary cities, suspending refugee resettlement, or banning federal funds for gender-affirming care). Trump called it a “monumental victory for the Constitution.”

  2. Mahmoud v. Taylor – LGBTQ+ Books and Parental Rights (June 27, 2025)

    • Case Description: Christian and Muslim parents in Montgomery County, Maryland, sued to opt their children out of public school lessons featuring LGBTQ+-themed storybooks, arguing the lack of an opt-out violated their First Amendment religious freedom rights. The books included titles like Uncle Bobby’s Wedding and Pride Puppy, which the parents claimed promoted transgender ideology or same-sex relationships.

    • Ruling: In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that school officials cannot require children to participate in lessons with materials conflicting with their parents’ religious beliefs. Justice Samuel Alito authored the majority opinion, including images from the books in an appendix, emphasizing their content for young readers. Liberal justices, led by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, dissented, warning of “chaos” for public schools.

    • Impact: A significant victory for parental rights and religious freedom, aligning with Trump’s campaign promises to restore parental control over education. The ruling supports conservative efforts to limit exposure to LGBTQ+ content in schools and may lead to broader opt-out demands for other curricula (e.g., evolution or sex education). Trump celebrated it as a “tremendous victory for parents.”

  3. Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton – Texas Age-Verification Law (June 27, 2025)

    • Case Description: The Free Speech Coalition challenged a Texas law requiring age verification for accessing online pornography, arguing it violated adult free speech rights.

    • Ruling: In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court upheld the law, applying intermediate scrutiny and affirming the state’s interest in protecting minors.

    • Impact: While not directly tied to Trump’s administration, this ruling supports conservative social policies often endorsed by Trump’s base, reinforcing state-level restrictions on content deemed inappropriate for minors, which aligns with broader anti-LGBTQ+ and family-values rhetoric.

  4. Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services – Reverse Discrimination (June 5, 2025)

    • Case Description: A straight Ohio woman sued her employer, alleging her gay boss denied her a promotion due to her sexual orientation, challenging a requirement for majority-group plaintiffs to provide extra evidence of discrimination (e.g., statistical patterns).

    • Ruling: The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects majority groups (e.g., straight, white, or male individuals) equally, eliminating the “background circumstances” requirement. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson authored the opinion, with Justice Clarence Thomas concurring.

    • Impact: A conservative win that aligns with Trump’s critiques of DEI programs, making it easier for majority-group members to file discrimination lawsuits. This could challenge workplace policies perceived as favoring LGBTQ+ or minority groups.

  5. Smith & Wesson Brands v. Mexico – Gun Rights (June 5, 2025)

    • Case Description: Mexico sued Smith & Wesson, seeking damages for cartel violence linked to trafficked firearms, claiming the company was liable.

    • Ruling: In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court upheld the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), shielding gun manufacturers from liability for crimes involving legally sold firearms unless specific laws were violated. Justice Elena Kagan authored the opinion.

    • Impact: A major victory for gun rights advocates, a key Trump constituency, reinforcing Second Amendment protections and limiting foreign legal challenges to U.S. gun manufacturers.

  6. Catholic Charities Bureau v. Wisconsin – Religious Freedom (June 5, 2025)

    • Case Description: Wisconsin denied Catholic Charities an unemployment compensation tax exemption, arguing it didn’t perform traditional religious functions (e.g., sacraments).

    • Ruling: The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the exemption applies to all factions of a religious entity, not just those performing traditional religious duties. Justice Sonia Sotomayor authored the opinion.

    • Impact: A win for religious freedom, aligning with Trump-era priorities to protect religious organizations’ participation in public programs, which often intersects with conservative stances on social issues like LGBTQ+ rights.

  7. United States v. Skrmetti – Tennessee Gender-Affirming Care Ban (June 18, 2025)

    • Case Description: Parents and advocacy groups challenged Tennessee’s law banning gender-affirming care (e.g., puberty blockers, hormone therapy) for minors, arguing it violated equal protection and parental rights.

    • Ruling: The Supreme Court upheld Tennessee’s ban in a 6–3 decision, finding the state had a legitimate interest in protecting minors from irreversible medical procedures. The ruling rejected claims that the ban discriminated based on sex or infringed on parental rights.

    • Impact: A major win for conservative policies restricting transgender healthcare, aligning with Trump’s agenda to limit gender-affirming care (e.g., his executive actions against federal funding for such procedures). Critics, including dissenting justices, argued it undermines parental rights, but the ruling supports state-level bans favored by Trump’s base.

  8. J.G.G. v. Trump – Alien Enemies Act Deportations (April 7, 2025)

    • Case Description: The Trump administration used the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan migrants, alleged gang members, to third countries like El Salvador.

    • Ruling: On April 7, the Supreme Court temporarily lifted temporary restraining orders (TROs) blocking these deportations, allowing them to proceed, but remanded the case to lower courts to address habeas corpus jurisdiction issues.

    • Impact: A temporary win for Trump’s aggressive deportation policies, though a later D.C. district court ruling (June 4, 2025) required due process for detainees, slightly limiting implementation.

  9. Social Security Administration Case – DOGE Access (June 6, 2025)

    • Case Description: The Trump administration sought to grant the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) access to Social Security records to streamline federal operations.

    • Ruling: The Supreme Court ruled that the Social Security Administration could provide DOGE access to records, overruling a discovery order requiring internal communications to be disclosed.

    • Impact: Supports Trump’s government efficiency agenda through DOGE, aligning with his goal to reduce bureaucratic inefficiencies, though details remain limited due to sparse primary-source confirmation.

Federal Courts & Appeals – Major Pro-Trump Rulings

  1. V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. Trump – Tariffs (May 28, 2025)

    • Case Description: Lawsuits challenged Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), arguing they exceeded presidential authority.

    • Ruling: The U.S. Court of International Trade initially struck down the tariffs, but on May 28, a federal appeals court granted a temporary pause on the injunction pending appeal, allowing the tariffs to remain in effect temporarily.

    • Impact: A partial win for Trump, preserving his tariff policy for now, though the case may escalate to the Supreme Court.

Summary Table

Court & Case

Date

Ruling Summary

Impact

SCOTUS – Trump v. CASA

June 27, 2025

Curbed nationwide injunctions, allowing Trump’s birthright citizenship order in some jurisdictions

Empowers executive actions, limits judicial overreach

SCOTUS – Mahmoud v. Taylor

June 27, 2025

Parents can opt kids out of LGBTQ+-themed lessons due to religious beliefs

Win for parental rights and religious freedom, aligns with Trump’s education agenda

SCOTUS – Free Speech v. Paxton

June 27, 2025

Upheld Texas age-verification law for online content

Supports conservative social policies

SCOTUS – Ames v. Ohio

June 5, 2025

Removed “background circumstances” burden for majority-group discrimination claims

Levels anti-discrimination law, challenges DEI frameworks

SCOTUS – Smith & Wesson v. Mexico

June 5, 2025

Upheld PLCAA, shielding gun manufacturers

Major win for Second Amendment advocates

SCOTUS – Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin

June 5, 2025

Upheld tax exemptions for religious charities

Expands religious freedom protections

SCOTUS – United States v. Skrmetti

June 18, 2025

Upheld Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors

Supports conservative restrictions on transgender healthcare

SCOTUS – J.G.G. v. Trump

April 7, 2025

Lifted TROs, allowing Alien Enemies Act deportations

Supports Trump’s deportation agenda

SCOTUS – Social Security/DOGE

June 6, 2025

Allowed DOGE access to Social Security records

Advances Trump’s efficiency agenda

Court of Int’l Trade/Appeals – V.O.S. Selections v. Trump

May 28, 2025

Paused injunction against Trump’s tariffs

Preserves tariff policy pending appeal


Key Takeaways

  • LGBTQ+ and Parental Rights: The Mahmoud v. Taylor and United States v. Skrmetti rulings are direct wins for conservative policies limiting LGBTQ+ content in schools and restricting gender-affirming care, aligning with Trump’s campaign promises to prioritize parental rights and traditional values. These decisions reflect the influence of his appointed justices (e.g., Barrett, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch) in the 6–3 conservative majority.

  • Executive Power: Trump v. CASA strengthens Trump’s ability to implement controversial policies (e.g., birthright citizenship, sanctuary city funding cuts, transgender care bans) by curbing nationwide injunctions, a tool often used to block his agenda.

  • Cultural Conservatism: Rulings like Free Speech v. Paxton and Catholic Charities bolster conservative social priorities, resonating with Trump’s base on issues like family values and religious liberty.

  • Civil Rights and Guns: Ames and Smith & Wesson support conservative critiques of DEI and Second Amendment protections, key Trump priorities.

  • Immigration and Efficiency: J.G.G. v. Trump and the Social Security/DOGE case (though less documented) advance Trump’s immigration and government streamlining goals.

     

In the end...

These rulings from late April to June 2025 underscore the significant influence of Trump’s judicial appointees and his administration’s priorities in shaping legal outcomes. The Supreme Court’s conservative majority has delivered key victories in limiting judicial overreach (Trump v. CASA), protecting parental rights and religious freedom (Mahmoud v. Taylor, Catholic Charities), restricting LGBTQ+ policies (United States v. Skrmetti), and upholding gun rights (Smith & Wesson). Federal courts have offered mixed but notable support, particularly on tariffs. Together, these decisions bolster Trump’s agenda on immigration, cultural conservatism, and government efficiency, while fueling debates over parental rights and LGBTQ+ issues in schools and healthcare.


Notes

  • LGBTQ+ Context: The Mahmoud v. Taylor ruling directly addresses parental rights to opt out of LGBTQ+-themed education, a flashpoint in conservative culture wars. United States v. Skrmetti reinforces state-level restrictions on transgender care, consistent with Trump’s executive actions against federal funding for such procedures. These align with sentiments expressed in X posts celebrating religious liberty and parental control.

  • Parental Rights: The Mahmoud ruling is seen as a “huge win” for religious liberty and parental rights, though critics warn it could disrupt public education by enabling broader opt-outs.

  • DOGE Case: Included based on an X post, but limited primary-source confirmation suggests caution in assessing its scope.

  • Lower Court Activity: Few federal court rulings in this period were outright pro-Trump, as many (e.g., tariff and deportation challenges) faced initial blocks, though appeals like V.O.S. Selections provided temporary relief.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Senate Draft Pushes Trump’s MAGA Agenda Forward

When President Donald J. Trump stood before the American people and laid out his bold, unapologetic campaign platform is centered on tax relief, border security, economic revival, energy independence, and constitutional restoration, few imagined he’d deliver it all in one unified stroke. But with the introduction of the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBBA), that is exactly what he’s done.

Crafted as a surgical, reconciliation-only legislative package, OBBBA bypasses Senate filibuster rules and codifies every core promise of Trump’s campaign into law. This isn’t just a bill. It’s a blueprint for restoring the American Republic. It’s a MAGA rally translated into legislation. As senior advisor Stephen Miller declared, “This is the most pro-American, pro-worker, and fiscally responsible package to come out of Washington in a generation.”

On Capitol Hill, both chambers have risen to the occasion. The House version (H.R. 1) passed with bold reforms that permanently enshrine Trump’s tax relief, enforce the border, and trim government waste. And now, the Senate draft version which is crafted with procedural discipline to comply with the Byrd rule which delivers the same America First results with slight modifications for reconciliation compliance. Both versions carry the DNA of Trump’s 2024 platform, and both get the job done.

While most presidents hope to get one or two of their campaign pledges passed in a given term and still be considered successful, President Trump is superseding that standard by a factor of at least five. This is comprehensive, unprecedented, and unmistakably MAGA.

House vs. Senate: One Mission, Two Vehicles

Here’s a comparison of how the House and Senate bills line up with President Trump’s campaign promises or click here for the PDF version.

Trump’s Promises (America First Agenda)

House OBBBA (H.R. 1)

Senate OBBBA (Draft)

Make 2017 Trump tax cuts permanent

✅ Locks in 2017 tax cuts across brackets.

✅ Matches House: all core tax cuts retained.

No tax on tips

✅ Ends IRS taxation of gratuities — full exemption. Boosts take-home pay for service workers.

✅ Preserved in Senate draft. Unions and gig workers also see gains.

Overtime pay fully deductible

✅ Overtime income excluded from tax calculation — rewards hustle and blue-collar work ethic.

✅ Maintained in Senate framework. Strong bipartisan interest.

No tax on Social Security income

✅ Permanently exempts Social Security from federal income tax.

✅ Same guarantee — no clawback, no surprise taxation.

Full deductibility of car loan interest (for U.S.-made vehicles)

✅ Interest on American-made car loans is fully deductible. Made-in-USA incentive.

✅ Carried over with minor procedural tweaks. MAGA auto industry support.

Pro-energy, anti-inflation deregulation

✅ Eliminates Biden-era energy rules, unleashes fossil fuels, reduces energy costs.

✅ Keeps core deregulation, adds state flexibility on permitting.

Real border security, fully funded — no debt

✅ Border wall + ICE/CBP funded via visa and immigration fees — not taxpayers.

✅ Confirmed: fee-based funding model held. Zero taxpayer burden.

Cut spending, not services — reduce deficit

✅ Saves $1.6–$1.7 T over 10 years via work requirements, Medicaid eligibility checks, and welfare reform — no benefit cuts for seniors or disabled.

✅ Senate follows same cost-saving path. Adds Medicare fraud prevention and Advantage reform.

Preserve Medicaid — just end abuse

✅ “Granny’s Medicaid” untouched. Focuses on able-bodied adults abusing the system.

✅ Protects essential care, strengthens integrity. Focus: enforcement, not cuts.

Child Tax Credit expanded

✅ Increased credit, simplified access. More help for working families.

✅ Matches House level but adjusts income phase-out slightly for Byrd compliance.

Respect for states, courts, and separation of powers

✅ Blocks federal AI overreach; safeguards state autonomy; restores contempt enforcement.

✅ Senate likely to trim AI section per parliamentarian ruling but retains judicial protection clauses.


In the end...It's Legislative MAGA in Motion

This bill reflects serious, focused leadership: no distractions, no delays. It is just action on the commitments made to the American people. Whether through the House version or the Senate’s draft, the result is clear and consistent: Trump’s campaign agenda is being written into law.

This is legislative MAGA in motion. This is what America voted for. And this is how we restore the Republic.

The White House

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals