the Conservative TAKE
Politics • Culture • News
The Survey That TRANSFORMED MAGA, Ushering in a New Freedom Maverick
post photo preview

In May 2024, the 1776 Law Center commissioned a groundbreaking poll that has the potential to reshape the future of the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement. Conducted by the reputable BIG DATA POLL, this survey used statistically validated methodologies and proprietary access to voter files to ensure a representative snapshot of the American electorate. Over 2,000 registered voters were interviewed nationwide from May 17 to May 24, 2024, using a mixed-mode approach that included online and phone interviews. The results, weighted for gender, age, race, ethnicity, education, geography, and region, provide a clear understanding of Middle America's priorities and could serve as a catalyst for a resurgence in the MAGA movement's influence and direction.

Medical Freedom: A Rallying Cry Against Government Overreach

One of the most striking findings of the poll was the overwhelming concern over medical freedom. Middle Americans, still reeling from the government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, expressed deep unease with what they perceive as an erosion of their autonomy in making personal health decisions. The survey revealed that 75% of Americans agree that "drug companies should not be immune from suit if their vaccines cause injuries," with 50% strongly agreeing. Support for ending Big Pharma's immunity for vaccine injuries is consistent across all demographics, ideologies, and regions, making it a unifying issue in a highly polarized environment.

This issue significantly impacts voter behavior, with 68% of respondents stating they would be more likely to support a candidate who advocates for holding drug companies accountable if vaccines cause injury. The poll also revealed widespread skepticism toward the COVID-19 vaccines, with less than half of the country (48%) believing they are safe and effective. This distrust is most pronounced among younger voters, minority groups, and swing voters—key demographics that will play a decisive role in the 2024 election. Notably, 30% of Americans reported that they or someone close to them suffered serious adverse reactions from the COVID-19 vaccine, highlighting the intensity of concern around this issue.

Food Freedom: Protecting America's Heartland

The poll also highlighted growing anxiety about food security and the role of federal regulations in agriculture. Middle Americans, particularly those in rural areas, voiced concerns about the sustainability of food supply chains and the impact of government policies on small farmers. Food Freedom has emerged as a top issue for voters in 2024, with massive support across ideologies, parties, regions, races, religions, incomes, and familial statuses. It is especially popular among voters certain to vote in 2024 and key swing voters, such as Independents who do not align with either party and those considering voting for Trump, Kennedy, or even a third party.

Support for Food Freedom is not only broad but also deep, with 58% of respondents more likely to support a candidate who backs the right to buy food directly from farmers without government permission. This issue resonates strongly with core MAGA supporters, who have long championed the interests of America’s heartland and the preservation of traditional values, including the importance of local food production and self-sufficiency. The survey revealed that 50% strongly agree that "Americans should be allowed to buy food directly from farmers without getting government permission," indicating that this issue could be a decisive factor for many voters in the upcoming election.

Political Freedom: Defending Constitutional Rights

Political freedom emerged as another critical issue, with respondents emphasizing the need to safeguard constitutional rights. The poll revealed significant concern over perceived threats to free speech, religious liberty, and the right to bear arms. Many Middle Americans feel that these fundamental freedoms are under attack, particularly in the face of increasing censorship and attempts to curtail individual liberties. This issue has always been at the core of the MAGA movement, which positions itself as a defender of the Constitution and the rights it guarantees. The poll’s findings suggest that these concerns will continue to drive the movement’s agenda, rallying supporters around the cause of protecting and preserving American freedoms.

Financial Freedom: Reclaiming Economic Independence

Economic issues also played a significant role in the poll, with respondents expressing deep frustration with inflation, taxation, and government spending. There is a strong sense that the federal government’s economic policies are contributing to financial instability and eroding the economic independence of everyday Americans. Middle Americans are increasingly supportive of non-fiat, decentralized stable currencies like Bitcoin, viewing them as a way to protect against inflation and government overreach. This growing interest in alternative currencies reflects a broader desire for fiscal conservatism, reduced government spending, and policies that promote self-reliance. This trend aligns with the MAGA movement’s emphasis on financial freedom, deregulation, and the empowerment of individuals over centralized government control.

A Turning Point for MAGA?

The findings of the 1776 Law Center poll could mark a turning point for the MAGA movement. As the movement looks to the future, these insights from Middle America offer a clear roadmap for reinvigorating its base and expanding its influence. By focusing on the issues that matter most to Middle Americans—medical, food, political, and financial freedoms—MAGA can reclaim its position as the voice of the forgotten men and women of the country.

This poll serves as a reminder that the principles of limited government, personal responsibility, and individual liberty are not only still relevant but are deeply cherished by a significant portion of the American populace. As MAGA leaders and candidates prepare for upcoming elections, they would do well to heed the message coming from Middle America: the fight for freedom is far from over, and the movement that once promised to make America great again may be poised to do so once more.

The Influence on Trump's Vision: A New Direction

The impact of this poll extends beyond general support for the movement. According to Robert Barnes of the "Barnes and Rich Baris People's Pundit" podcast, the 1776 Law Center poll was instrumental in altering Donald Trump’s views on Big Agriculture, Big Pharma, and the fiat dollar. Barnes noted that the overwhelming support among Middle Americans for greater independence from these powerful sectors resonated deeply with Trump, prompting him to reconsider and ultimately shift his stance on these issues. This change in perspective is not merely a strategic pivot but a reflection of Trump’s willingness to align his policies with the genuine concerns of his core supporters.

The Trump-RFK Jr. Alliance: A Partnership Rooted in Shared Values

Perhaps the most surprising outcome of this shift has been Trump’s interest in bringing Robert F. Kennedy Jr. onto his ticket. This potential partnership, driven by shared concerns about the influence of Big Pharma and government overreach, has generated significant enthusiasm among MAGA supporters and the broader public. RFK Jr., who was just 14 years old when his father was tragically assassinated, has long felt a duty to continue his family’s legacy of public service. His empathy, born of personal loss and a lifelong commitment to justice, resonates with voters who feel disconnected from the elites in Washington.

Contrary to popular narratives that paint this alliance as a quid pro quo relationship, insiders assert that it is an honest and innocent collaboration aimed at bettering the country. RFK Jr.'s reputation as a strong speaker and his alignment with the concerns highlighted in the 1776 Law Center poll make him a natural fit for Trump. Their partnership represents a convergence of shared values and goals, particularly in their mutual desire to challenge the status quo and restore power to the people.

Popular Support and the Path Forward

The Trump-RFK Jr. alliance has proven to be highly popular among both MAGA supporters and regular Middle Americans. The 1776 Law Center poll revealed a deep and widespread yearning for leaders who prioritize individual freedoms and resist the influence of powerful special interests. This partnership embodies those values, offering a vision of America that is free from the grip of Big Agriculture, Big Pharma, and financial manipulation.

In essence, this poll has the potential to change the course of MAGA by reinforcing its commitment to the core values that have always been at its heart. If the movement can successfully align its future policies with the priorities expressed in this poll, it could very well spark a new chapter in the ongoing quest to restore and preserve the freedoms that define the American experience. The Trump-RFK Jr. ticket may be the key to unlocking a new era of American politics, where the concerns of the people take precedence over the interests of the powerful, and the MAGA movement finds itself reinvigorated by a renewed focus on the issues that matter most to Middle America.

For more detailed survey results, you can visit the 1776 Law Center's surveys on Food Freedom and Medical Freedom.

community logo
Join the the Conservative TAKE Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Odds of Love: A Probability Study Proving Jasmine Crockett’s Race Baiting Ignores the Real Challenges of Finding a Conservative Black Match

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Representative Jasmine Crockett’s recent criticism of Representative Byron Donalds for marrying a white woman highlights a regressive mindset steeped in ignorance and racial bias, casting doubt on her ability to engage with the diverse realities of American life.

https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1906302926571618409

By implying that Donalds has been “whitewashed” through his interracial marriage, Crockett clings to outdated stereotypes that dictate racial loyalty over personal agency, exposing her own hypocrisy in advocating for equality while policing others’ private choices. This narrow perspective stands in stark contrast to the evolving dynamics of relationships across racial lines, as evidenced by a probabilistic analysis of partner selection among conservative Black individuals. To illustrate the complexity of such dynamics, consider the following study estimating the likelihood of a conservative Black man finding and marrying a conservative Black woman who aligns with his values—a scenario Crockett might deem more “acceptable,” yet one fraught with its own...

00:00:46
00:01:20
Biblical Citizenship in Modern America Commentary Ep14 - Understanding the Times 3

00:00 Introduction
02:03 Week 13 review
04:56 Our Current Education System
05:59 Six Verbs for Advancing Truth in the Country
09:08 What Our Elected Officials Don't Know About America
10:44 The Foundation of Law
12:12 Who Were the Signers of the Declaration of Independence?
13:52 Benjamin Rush
15:44 What is Patriotism?
18:34 Summary of Workbook

00:25:36
🧨 The Deep State’s Attempt to Spin Damning Declassified Evidence

As declassified documents continue to expose what appears to be a coordinated intelligence operation against Donald Trump, the Deep State and their media allies are in full damage-control mode.

Case in point: Fox News just featured an op-ed by former CIA officer and Biden State Department spokesman Ned Price, attempting to “debunk” the bombshells released by DNI Tulsi Gabbard.

Make no bones about it, this isn’t an objective counterpoint. This is a narrative-management operation by a career Deep State insider.

🕵️‍♂️ Here’s What They’re Trying to Sell You:
That Obama couldn’t have led a coup because… he congratulated Trump after the election. (Yes, seriously.)

That Gabbard is using “sleight of hand” and “conflating” terms, even though her claims are backed by declassified U.S. intelligence.

That the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) was sound , even though multiple internal reviews, the Durham Report, and Senate oversight found evidence it was politicized.

That the ...

post photo preview
Why Subpoena Them If They’ll Plead the Fifth? Because It’s Protocol for Prosecution.

Here is what many do not understand. I get the frustration but there is a method to the madness. Let me explain.

Subpoenaing Barack Obama, John Brennan, James Clapper, and others over the RussiaGate scandal (even if they ultimately plead the Fifth) is not just a procedural move; it’s a necessary step in any serious pursuit of justice and public accountability.

🔹 Why Subpoena Them?

1. Establish the Record:

You must formally bring these individuals under oath to compel their testimony. Whether they answer or invoke the Fifth, the act of subpoenaing is essential to build the official record and demonstrate due diligence in investigating the alleged conspiracy.

2. Indictment Requires Precedent:

Before a prosecutor can credibly seek an indictment (especially against former high-level officials) there must be an evidentiary trail. That includes prior sworn testimony or refusal to testify. Subpoenaing them is a legal and political prerequisite to indictments.

3. Public Opinion Matters:

...

post photo preview
How to Prevent Temporary Work Status from Becoming a Pathway to Citizenship

As Congress debates proposals like Rep. Maria Salazar’s Dignity Act (H.R. 4393), which offers temporary legal work status to undocumented immigrants, it is essential to demand ironclad safeguards to prevent any backdoor pathway to citizenship. Though marketed as a limited fix for labor shortages, the Dignity Act risks becoming a stepping stone to amnesty without strict statutory limits. This is something history has repeatedly shown can happen.

Other legislative efforts (such as proposed tweaks to the H-2A visa program or Temporary Protected Status (TPS) provisions within broader packages like the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1)) are more narrowly focused. These alternatives address specific visa categories or enforcement priorities but do not provide comprehensive legal status to undocumented workers. That makes the Dignity Act uniquely broad and therefore especially in need of close scrutiny and firm constraints.

To ensure that any temporary worker program remains truly temporary, Congress must...

Restoring Federalism: Repealing Selective Incorporation and Returning to the Founders’ Vision of State Sovereignty

 

Executive Summary

If constitutional originalists such as historian David Barton or jurists in the tradition of Justice Clarence Thomas could propose one constitutional amendment, it would be this:

"To repeal the doctrine of selective incorporation, thereby restoring the Bill of Rights to its original purpose: a restraint solely on the federal government, not the states."

The selective incorporation doctrine—derived from the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause—has enabled federal courts to impose nationalized standards on state governments, in areas ranging from religion and speech to criminal procedure and gun rights. Though seemingly protective of individual liberties, this doctrine has also eroded state sovereignty, upended local moral governance, and consolidated federal judicial supremacy—a direction wholly foreign to the Founders’ original design.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Yes, We Have the Evidence: Obama Officials Accused in Treasonous Coup Against Trump

In a bombshell report, conservative commentator Dr. Steve Turley claims that former President Barack Obama is at the center of a scandal that dwarfs Watergate, potentially marking one of the most significant political controversies in American history.

placeholder
 

According to Turley, newly declassified intelligence documents (released by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard) reveal a "treasonous conspiracy" orchestrated at the highest levels of government, implicating Obama himself.

Turley cites a Truth Social post by President Donald Trump, featuring an AI-generated video symbolically depicting Obama’s arrest and imprisonment. While the video is not literal, Turley argues it reflects a growing sentiment that “the walls are closing in” on the former president. He describes the unfolding events as a “national scandal” with a paper trail leading directly to Obama—one that could become what Turley calls the “crown jewel” of Trump’s historic legacy.

AI Generated

 

The Allegations: A Coup in Motion

Turley’s central claim is based on over 100 declassified documents, which he says have been referred to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution. According to Turley:

  • Before the 2016 election, every major U.S. intelligence agency (including the FBI, CIA, NSA, and Department of Homeland Security) agreed there was no evidence of Russian collusion with Trump’s campaign.

  • Despite this, Turley alleges that in December 2016, shortly after Trump’s victory, Obama ordered a coordinated effort to fabricate intelligence contradicting those findings.

This alleged effort involved senior officials such as:

  • FBI Director James Comey

  • Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe

  • CIA Director John Brennan

  • Director of National Intelligence James Clapper

  • Secretary of State John Kerry

  • National Security Adviser Susan Rice

According to Turley, this operation was intended to delegitimize Trump’s presidency, amounting to a “systematic creation of false intelligence.” Citing Tulsi Gabbard, Turley calls this a “treasonous” act that undermined the democratic process and triggered a constitutional crisis.

Beyond Partisan Lines: A Threat to Democracy

Turley emphasizes that this is not a partisan issue:

“It’s irrelevant whether you’re Republican or Democrat… What Tulsi is exposing represents a fundamental attack on the democratic process.”

He warns that the alleged actions went far beyond political maneuvering. They represented a direct assault on the legitimacy of a duly elected president and on the will of the American people.

Whistleblowers & the Call for Justice

Turley also claims that whistleblowers from within Obama’s administration are now coming forward, ready to testify. These individuals, he says, are preparing affidavits describing how federal institutions were weaponized against the American people.

Gabbard has emphasized the need for accountability:

  • Prosecutions and indictments are necessary, she argues, to restore trust in democratic institutions.

  • Turley agrees, framing this not as a matter of revenge, but of justice, ensuring that no future administration can misuse intelligence agencies for political ends.

Media Complicity & the Fight for Truth

Turley warns that the legacy media—which he labels as “complicit” in the scandal—may attempt to bury or discredit the story. However, he insists:

“The documents don’t lie.”

He predicts that within months, a major media figure might break ranks and expose the media’s role in covering up the scandal, further amplifying its national impact.

Final Word: A Populist Crossroads

In a broader appeal, Turley urges Americans to stay engaged:

  • He calls on citizens to demand accountability and stand with a populist movement that cuts across traditional political lines.

  • He stresses: “The rule of law must apply equally to everyone.”

As the Justice Department—now led by Pam Bondi, reviews the evidence, Turley promises to continue monitoring developments and keep his audience informed.

placeholder


Source: Dr. Steve Turley

Read full Article
post photo preview
Obama's Alleged Treason: Timeline of Declassified Russia Hoax Revelations
Explosive declassified documents, released by Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard, have exposed what she describes as a "treasonous conspiracy" by the Obama administration to undermine President Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory.

placeholder
 

Sourced exclusively from the intelligence community (not the Department of Justice (DOJ)) these documents reveal that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies unanimously concluded there was no Russian interference in the 2016 election. Below is a detailed timeline of events, followed by an analysis under distinct subheadings, shedding light on this alleged conspiracy and its implications.



Timeline of Events
 

Pre-November 2016: Intelligence Community Consensus

  • All 17 U.S. intelligence agencies, including the CIA, FBI, NSA, and Department of Homeland Security, consistently assessed that Russia lacked the intent and capability to influence the 2016 election through cyberattacks. Internal intelligence community reports documented no evidence of Russian interference in election infrastructure or vote manipulation.
December 8, 2016: Presidential Daily Brief Drafted
  • A Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) was prepared, stating: “Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.” This document, intended for public release, affirmed the intelligence community’s consensus that Russia did not alter the election outcome.
December 9, 2016: Secret White House Meeting
  • President Obama convened a closed-door meeting in the White House Situation Room with FBI Director James Comey, Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, CIA Director John Brennan, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, Secretary of State John Kerry, and National Security Adviser Susan Rice. Despite the PDB’s findings, the group allegedly decided to suppress this assessment and pursue a contradictory narrative.
Post-December 9, 2016: Fabrication of Intelligence
  • Following the meeting, Obama administration officials reportedly ordered a new intelligence assessment that contradicted prior findings, relying on the discredited Steele dossier, funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Anonymous sources, presumably Obama officials, leaked false claims to The Washington Post and The New York Times, asserting Russian intervention to aid Trump’s victory.
January 6, 2017: Politicized Intelligence Assessment Released
  • DNI James Clapper released an Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) claiming Russia intervened to help Trump win, ignoring earlier dissenting intelligence. This report, allegedly based on the Steele dossier, fueled media narratives and set the stage for the Mueller investigation.
2017–2019: Mueller Investigation and Its Fallout
  • The fabricated assessment underpinned Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Trump-Russia collusion, costing tens of millions of dollars. The 2019 Mueller report found no evidence of Trump campaign collusion but affirmed Russian interference efforts, aligning with the politicized ICA. This led to two impeachments and years of political harassment against Trump.
July 18–19, 2025: Gabbard’s Declassification and DOJ Referral
  • DNI Tulsi Gabbard declassified over 100 pages of documents, including emails, memos, and intelligence assessments from 2016–2017. Labeling the Obama administration’s actions a “treasonous conspiracy,” she turned the documents over to the DOJ for potential criminal prosecution of Obama, Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Kerry, Rice, and McCabe.

Intelligence Community’s Unanimous Finding

The core revelation from Gabbard’s declassified documents is the intelligence community’s consensus that Russia did not interfere in the 2016 election. All 17 agencies (CIA, FBI, NSA, DHS, and others) concluded before and after the election that Russia lacked the intent or capability to hack or alter election results. This finding, documented in internal reports and the suppressed December 2016 PDB, directly contradicts the narrative pushed by the Obama administration and amplified by legacy media for years.
 

Strategic Release to Avoid Lawfare Accusations

Gabbard’s decision to release these documents through the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, rather than the DOJ, is a calculated move to sidestep accusations of prosecutorial misconduct or “lawfare.” By making the evidence public and referring it to the DOJ, Gabbard ensures transparency and shifts the responsibility to Attorney General Pam Bondi to pursue charges. This approach deflects claims of political retribution, as the allegations originate from intelligence community findings, not a prosecutor’s office.
 

Legal Pathways for Accountability

The documents open several legal avenues for prosecution. Under 18 U.S.C. § 371, conspiracy to defraud the United States allows prosecutors to file charges in any federal district court, bypassing potentially biased Washington, D.C., juries. Additionally, 18 U.S.C. § 3237 permits venue selection in any district touched by the crime, such as New York or Virginia, where less partisan juries may be found. Crucially, there is no statute of limitations for federal treason, meaning figures like Obama, Comey, and Brennan could face charges for their alleged roles. However, military tribunals are not an option, as treason and related crimes are tried in civilian Article III courts, not military commissions, despite some online speculation.
 

Challenges in Securing Convictions

Despite the compelling evidence, convicting high-profile figures like Obama in Washington, D.C., courts is unlikely due to the city’s heavily Democratic jury pool. A 2020 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report, which affirmed Russian interference but found no vote tampering or Trump campaign collusion, may also complicate public perception. To overcome these challenges, prosecutors could leverage multi-district venue options or focus on conspiracy charges to pursue justice in less partisan jurisdictions. A “nuclear option” of Congress reorganizing the D.C. federal court system, while theoretically possible, is politically unfeasible given the slim Republican majority.
 

Broader Implications and Public Response

These revelations, if substantiated, expose a deliberate attempt by the Obama administration to sabotage Trump’s presidency through fabricated intelligence, constituting what Gabbard calls an “attempted coup.” The documents undermine years of media narratives and political actions, including the Mueller investigation and Trump’s impeachments. Public reaction, as noted on platforms like X, reflects deep skepticism about D.C. courts’ impartiality, with calls for accountability resonating among Trump supporters. The truth, long obscured, now fuels demands for justice and a reckoning for the alleged misuse of intelligence community power.
 
placeholder
 

Note: This article is based on the provided transcript and declassified documents cited from credible sources, including Turley Talks, The Guardian, Fox News, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Readers are encouraged to review primary sources for a comprehensive understanding.


Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals