data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bef/65bef0d557097d492420cb2debef70a95fe57a7d" alt="post photo preview"
In a startling revelation, Google Growth Strategist Dakota Leazer admitted that the tech giant has been actively manipulating its search engine advertisements to favor Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. This admission came during an undercover operation conducted by an OMG (O’Keefe Media Group) journalist, where Leazer detailed the strategic coordination between Google and the Harris campaign, pointing out how the tech company exploited its vast advertising reach to bolster Harris's public image.
Leazer explained that Google had crafted ads which gave the appearance of legitimate news sources, misleading users into believing they were engaging with unbiased reporting. He stated, “It seemed to link out to legitimate news publication sites. So, it seemed like it was an ad from PBS, but it was really an ad for the Kamala campaign.” By masking partisan content with the veneer of trusted news outlets, Google was able to shape public perception under the guise of neutrality.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8f82/e8f827b38317143799a0c97f4b190986052688c7" alt="placeholder"
Profit-Driven Manipulation
Leazer’s confession didn’t stop at political bias; it extended into Google’s financial motives. He made it clear that Google’s manipulation was closely tied to its desire to generate ad revenue. The tech giant, according to Leazer, operates under a “fear sells” philosophy, similar to claims made by CNN’s former Technical Director Charlie Chester. Leazer highlighted that fear-based content is particularly profitable, with the most fearful demographic being the easiest to target with ad-driven narratives. He noted, “I think whatever demographic is most fearful is going to be most profitable.”
In this case, Leazer argued that the political left is more fearful than the right, and therefore more susceptible to the type of advertising Google was promoting. He said, “I think right now the left is more fearful than the right is.” This fear-based strategy is not new, but what is particularly concerning is the extent to which it appears to be integrated into Google’s political advertising structure, tied directly to the company's financial incentives.
Bias for Profit
Leazer went further, indicating that Google’s bias toward Harris and liberal causes was not purely ideological, but financially motivated. “It’s all about the share of the stock price,” Leazer said, pointing out that Google's left-leaning bias allows the company to benefit financially. By promoting narratives that align with liberal policies, Google stands to make more money. Leazer concluded, “I think Google has a belief that one side will allow them to make more money.”
This type of political manipulation through search engine optimization (SEO) and advertising highlights the increasing concern about the role of big tech in politics. Google's approach seems to be less about pushing political ideologies for ideological sake and more about capitalizing on the side that it believes will drive higher revenue streams.
Past Media Tactics Echoed
Leazer’s admission mirrors the strategies exposed by CNN’s Charlie Chester, who similarly revealed the mainstream media’s tendency to push fear-driven content for profit. Chester famously stated that “fear sells,” explaining the network’s preference for certain types of content that would stoke emotional reactions from their audience, ensuring a captive and engaged viewership. Google’s similar method of profiting from fear shows a coordinated approach by big tech and media companies to influence the political landscape and public sentiment.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d8b4/5d8b4d81d4f746051920b9b575466d7c8d049ddf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63d26/63d26106f10e57c12937223b08f509f7af5d579a" alt=""
The Aftermath
Since these undercover revelations came to light, Leazer has deleted his TikTok account, along with videos that displayed him wearing Google-branded merchandise. He also removed his bio and personal contact information, likely in response to the exposure of his comments about Google’s coordinated efforts to manipulate the election in Harris’s favor. The implications of this story, however, are not going away. The scandal raises serious questions about the power of big tech in shaping political outcomes and the future of free and fair elections.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/107dc/107dccbc74abb69abdd3ef92c8ec74676bc2b954" alt=""
Leazer’s admissions, captured by OMG (O’Keefe Media Group), provide further evidence of the deep connections between big tech, political campaigns, and the profit-driven bias that undermines trust in media and technology platforms. As these revelations continue to circulate, they will likely add to the growing debate about the role of Silicon Valley giants in political processes and whether greater transparency and regulation are needed to protect the integrity of future elections.