the Conservative TAKE
News • Politics • Culture
Kamala Harris and Willie Brown: The Scandalous Relationship We Must Not Ignore
The 1995 ABC News Moment: "Are You His Daughter?"
September 10, 2024
post photo preview
Kamala Harris, then 30, and Willie Brown, then 61, are seen together after they started dating in 1994
In 2020, former Mayor Willie Brown acknowledged having an extramarital affair with Kamala Harris.

In today's political climate, where every aspect of a public figure's past is scrutinized, it's entirely appropriate to examine Kamala Harris' relationship with former California State Assembly Speaker Willie Brown. Harris' political ascent, tied to her personal relationship with the powerful politician, raises legitimate questions about her rise in San Francisco politics and the path that eventually led her to the vice presidency.

Kamala Harris was 29 when she began a relationship with Brown, who was 60 at the time. Brown, often referred to as "The Godfather" of San Francisco politics, wielded enormous power and influence. Their relationship was far from a simple personal affair; it coincided with significant advancements in Harris’ political career, many of which can be traced directly to Brown’s backing.

How Brown Elevated Harris' Career

Willie Brown's support for Harris wasn't subtle. He appointed her to two lucrative state commission positions during the 1990s, one of which was the California Medical Assistance Commission, where she earned over $70,000 a year, equivalent to $120,000 today. Harris held that role from 1994 to 1998, attending only two meetings per month. Critics in the Democratic Party expressed frustration, not only because Harris lacked the necessary qualifications for the role, but because such positions were typically reserved for seasoned political allies who had helped keep Brown in power. Instead, he gave it to Harris, who was his girlfriend at the time.

November 8th, 1995 edition of the San Luis Obispo County Telegram Tribune.


Willie Brown, Kamala Harris' much older lover, not only gifted her a BMW but also helped her secure a second state commission position, significantly boosting her salary and establishing her both financially and politically. This infusion of wealth and political influence laid the groundwork for Harris to advance in her career, positioning her for greater success as she climbed the ranks within California's Democratic Party.

Breaking Up, But Not Letting Go

While their romantic relationship ended shortly after Brown was elected mayor of San Francisco in 1995, his influence on Harris’ political life did not. Even after their breakup, Brown played a significant behind-the-scenes role in Harris' campaign for San Francisco District Attorney in 2003. Brown is known to have used his connections and political clout to steer wealthy donors toward Harris, helping her secure the financial backing needed to launch her successful bid for the DA's office.

Vice President Kamala Harris has long denied that her relationship with former San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, 31 years her senior, was the defining factor in her political rise. Pictured together in 1995.

Harris, however, publicly distanced herself from Brown as she pursued her own political ambitions. In a now-famous interview with San Francisco Magazine, Harris stated that Willie Brown’s career was "over" and made it clear that it was now her time to shine. This cold dismissal of the man who had greatly advanced her political career is emblematic of Harris’ strategy to shed associations with political figures that could hinder her climb.

A Tough Prosecutor? Not So Fast

Throughout her career, Harris has portrayed herself as a tough prosecutor who fought against predators, fraudsters, and others who broke the law. However, her tenure as San Francisco District Attorney and later as California Attorney General is marked by controversy. Critics argue that Harris was more interested in advancing her political career than serving justice. Reports from both left-leaning and mainstream media have highlighted instances where she failed to properly prepare for her roles, such as not reading critical briefing materials.

Harris’ reputation as a prosecutor also included mixed signals, as she advocated for policies that were tough on crime in some cases but lenient on certain offenders in others. As vice president, this inconsistency has been mirrored by her struggles to find footing in national politics.

The 1995 ABC News Segment: A Viral Moment Revived Ahead of the Debate

The 1995 ABC News Segment - "Are you his daughter?"

In a notable 1995 ABC News segment, a reporter questioned Willie Brown about his relationship with Kamala Harris during his time as California State Assembly Speaker. The reporter, noticing Harris frequently by Brown's side at political events, bluntly asked if she was his daughter. Brown chuckled and clarified that Harris was not his daughter but acknowledged their relationship. This public moment highlighted the noticeable age gap between the two and underscored the influence Brown had in promoting Harris within California’s political scene, which raised eyebrows even at the time. Interestingly, this clip has recently resurfaced and is going viral ahead of tonight’s debate, reigniting conversations about the early days of Harris’ political career and the role Brown played in her rise to power.

placeholder


The Willie Brown Connection: Still Relevant

When discussing Harris’ political career, the influence of Willie Brown remains a crucial component. Despite attempts to distance herself from him, the facts of how she got her start cannot be ignored. Their relationship opened doors for her and propelled her into the upper echelons of California’s political scene. The notion that this should not be discussed, or that it is irrelevant to her current position, is misguided. When any political figure's rise to power involves close relationships with influential individuals, it’s natural—and fair—to question the dynamics at play.

In the context of Kamala Harris’ political ascent, her relationship with Willie Brown isn’t just a personal affair from the past; it’s part of the narrative that shaped her career. It’s worth noting that Harris has had to compete mostly within the liberal strongholds of California, where her competition largely consisted of other Democrats. She has never had to face the kind of fierce political opposition that figures like Donald Trump have thrived on, particularly in high-stakes national contests.

As we look to future elections, Harris’ past, including her relationship with Willie Brown, will continue to be a relevant discussion point for those assessing her qualifications and ability to lead. If anything, it raises essential questions about the nature of political power, influence, and personal ambition in American politics. Kamala Harris’ journey shows how powerful connections and strategic relationships can be just as influential as policy stances and public service records. It’s not shaming to ask these questions—it's simply holding leaders accountable for the entirety of their public life.

And in Kamala Harris' case, that public life cannot be fully understood without examining how she got her start with the help of Willie Brown.

Source: Megyn Kelly and Charlie Spiering Podcast Discussion

This information is sourced from a discussion between Megyn Kelly and Charlie Spiering, author of Amateur Hour, on Kelly's podcast from July 23, 2024. In their conversation, they explored Kamala Harris' early political career and the pivotal role Willie Brown, California’s most powerful politician at the time, played in advancing her. Kelly and Spiering highlighted how Harris' relationship with Brown led to key political appointments and lucrative opportunities that significantly shaped her rise within the Democratic Party.

community logo
Join the the Conservative TAKE Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
00:01:20
Biblical Citizenship in Modern America Commentary Ep14 - Understanding the Times 3

00:00 Introduction
02:03 Week 13 review
04:56 Our Current Education System
05:59 Six Verbs for Advancing Truth in the Country
09:08 What Our Elected Officials Don't Know About America
10:44 The Foundation of Law
12:12 Who Were the Signers of the Declaration of Independence?
13:52 Benjamin Rush
15:44 What is Patriotism?
18:34 Summary of Workbook

00:25:36
FREE TO ALL MEMBERS - Biblical Citizenship in Modern America Commentary Ep01 - The Foundation

CHAPTERS
00:00 Introduction
02:43 Outline
05:14 The Great Commission
10:03 Workbook
29:40 The Monument of the Forefathers Introduction
30:54 Wrap Up

💌 Join our YT channel to get access to perks:
http://JOIN.theConservativeTAKE.com/

🚫Want UNCENSORED content? Join us on Locals.
http://locals.theConservativeTAKE.com/

📢the Conservative Take Channel
https://youtube.com/theConservativeTAKE

🌟DISCORD
http://discord.theConservativeTAKE.com


🔗LINKS:

http://discord.theConservativeTAKE.com


📖 Real Help
The Gospel in 4 Minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ty6jU3PFCds

The Holy Bible
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiXQmeuHTOY&list=PLblm4cSmwa-ufOiEYfLkO1sJv3IyrFOIQ

URL Source links can be found on our discord server (📒video-resources channel) or join or via signing up as a member on our website, links below. Both are free to sign-up. ...

00:33:06
Why This so-called “economic blackout” is DUMB - 6 Reasons

This so-called “economic blackout” is completely pointless for several reasons:

1️⃣ People Will Just Spend on Thursday or Saturday – A one-day boycott doesn’t actually hurt businesses in the long run. If someone needs gas, food, or groceries, they’ll just buy it the day before or after. This means total revenue for the week won’t change much, if at all.

2️⃣ Conservatives Will Overspend to Counter It – The majority of Americans lean conservative, and they oppose these leftist protest stunts. Instead of hurting big businesses, this boycott will likely backfire, as conservatives will deliberately spend MORE to neutralize the impact.

3️⃣ Big Businesses Won’t Care – Large corporations operate on long-term revenue trends, not single-day sales. A minor dip in transactions over 24 hours means nothing compared to quarterly profits. They’ll recoup any losses within days.

4️⃣ It Won’t "Shake Things Up" – The idea that this will somehow force corporations to ...

Is Zelensky Acting Like a Dictator?

President Zelensky has suspended elections, banned opposition parties, and cracked down on religious groups. President Trump has labeled him a "dictator without elections." Is Zelensky defending Ukraine or consolidating power? Let's take a closer look.

Suspension of Elections – Zelensky canceled Ukraine’s 2024 elections, citing martial law. While Ukraine is at war, democratic countries (like the U.S. during the Civil War or the UK in WWII) have still held elections. His refusal to allow them raises concerns about democracy.

Crackdown on Opposition – Zelensky banned multiple political parties (including the Opposition Platform – For Life, the second-largest party in parliament) and seized control of TV networks to consolidate power.

Persecution of Religious Leaders – The Ukrainian government has arrested clergy of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, accusing them of being pro-Russian, which critics say is an attack on religious freedom.

Western Money Misuse – Reports suggest that ...

The Kyle Suggs Show Livestream: The 2nd Inauguration of 47th President Trump
placeholder
post photo preview
Transparency Isn’t Pretty: The Truth About the Early Pam Bondi-Epstein Fallout
UPDATED - 2/28/25 11:23am EST

This is what transparency looks like. We said we wanted it, and now we have it. The upside? We get real-time updates instead of secrecy. The downside? We enter a fog of war, where narratives shift, unpredictable things happen, and mistakes and bad optics are inevitable. Case in point: influencers leaving the White House, all smiles, carrying binders. Given the sheer number of victims and the horrific nature of the crimes, it was an awful look. But this is what transparency means; we are seeing the process unfold in real time, flaws and all. You can’t have it both ways.

Social media influencers leaving the White House, all smiles, carrying binders.

Under Biden, we got nothing. If Kamala had won, Epstein wouldn’t even be a topic of discussion. Now, for the first time, there’s movement, and yet, instead of focusing on the bigger picture, people are obsessing over optics. That’s shortsighted. We need to judge this by actual results. Draining the swamp isn’t for the weak; it’s an ugly, drawn-out process, and those who expect it to be clean and flawless are setting themselves up for disappointment.

The Debrief article - Photo Credit: White House

If you really think about it, the only reason some people are upset is that this administration is being transparent. That transparency, however, comes with growing pains. Accountability is necessary, yes, but it must be done properly. We understand the frustration, but overreacting only plays into the hands of those who want to keep information hidden. The Deep State isn’t going to roll over; they will fight back, sabotage the process, and manipulate the narrative to make transparency itself look like a mistake. The goal is to smoke the rats out, and if we lose focus or react emotionally, we risk delaying and weakening that effort. This fight is much bigger than one press conference or one bad photo-op. What matters is real results, not distractions.

Attorney General Pam Bondi has accused the FBI's New York field office of withholding "thousands of pages" of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. Despite prior assurances that all pertinent files had been provided, Bondi was recently informed of the existence of additional undisclosed materials. In response, she has demanded that FBI Director Kash Patel ensure the complete set of Epstein files including all records, documents, audio and video recordings, and related materials be delivered to her office by 8:00 a.m. on February 28, 2025. Bondi has also directed Patel to conduct an immediate investigation into the FBI's failure to comply with her initial order, requiring a comprehensive report of findings and proposed personnel actions within 14 days. Director Patel has pledged full cooperation, stating, "There will be no cover-ups, no missing documents, and no stone left unturned."


This blatant obstruction by the FBI is exactly why draining the swamp is such an uphill battle. Corrupt institutions don’t just comply—they resist, delay, and cover their tracks. It takes time to root out bad actors and regain control as Elon Musk put it perfectly:

"Imagine if you were suddenly appointed AG or head of the FBI. You were just thrown on a ship with a hostile crew. Until you appoint some new crew members and figure out the ropes, you can’t steer the ship effectively. It’s literally impossible."

The swamp isn’t just a modern problem; it has been embedded in American politics for nearly two centuries. Martin Van Buren perfected the spoils system, where political loyalty mattered more than competence, laying the foundation for the bureaucratic machine we now call the Deep State. Over time, that system grew more powerful, more unaccountable, and more resistant to reform; it became a self-preserving monster, designed to protect itself at all costs.

Today’s Deep State is the culmination of generations of backroom deals, institutional rot, and entrenched elites who believe they are above the law. This was never going to be an easy fight, and anyone who expected a clean, mistake-free process was never serious about what this battle actually requires.

A proper understanding of history and perspective is crucial. Draining the swamp isn’t just about a few firings or high-profile arrests; it’s about dismantling a system that has survived, adapted, and thrived since the 1800s. This isn’t a sprint; it’s a war, and wars are messy.

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Media Is Lying: 2025 Is the Safest Year for Aviation in Decades

In an era where the media selectively amplifies certain narratives, it’s easy to overlook real, measurable improvements in public safety. One such overlooked fact is that the U.S. has experienced a dramatic improvement in aviation safety in early 2025, making it the safest start to a year in at least two decades.

Caption

The Numbers Don't Lie

A simple query on the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) database confirms this:

  • January 2024: 80 aviation accidents
  • February 2024: 93 aviation accidents
  • January 2025: 62 aviation accidents
  • February 2025 (as of 2/23/25): 37 aviation accidents

    The NTSB aviation accident database contains civil aviation accidents and selected incidents that occurred from 1962 to present within the United States, its territories and possessions, and in international waters. 

That means aviation accidents in January and February 2025 have been cut by more than half compared to the same period in 2024—a drastic and undeniable improvement.

Looking at the broader picture, in 2024, the U.S. saw over 1,800 crashes, accidents, and near-miss incidents, leading to 317 fatalities. Yet, if we isolate January 2024 and January 2025, it’s clear that 2025 has seen a significant decline in total aviation incidents.

This isn’t just an improvement over last year—it’s the lowest monthly accident rate in the last 20 years.

Why Aren't We Talking About This?

With such a remarkable improvement in safety, you might expect widespread coverage of this positive trend. Instead, mainstream media outlets have largely ignored these statistics. Why? Because good news doesn’t generate fear, controversy, or clicks. Instead, the media focuses on isolated incidents, distorting public perception and making aviation seem more dangerous than ever—when, in fact, the opposite is true.

The reality is clear: Americans flying in 2025 are safer than they’ve been in decades. Whether due to advancements in technology, improved safety regulations, or more effective oversight, the numbers speak for themselves.

Aviation in 2025: Safer Than Ever

The data proves it: air travel in the U.S. is safer in 2025 than it was at this time in 2024, and likely safer than at any point in the last 20 years. Unfortunately, this isn’t a headline you’ll see on the evening news. But for those paying attention, it's a reminder that despite the noise and distraction, real progress is happening—whether the media acknowledges it or not.

placeholder

Read full Article
the Conservative TAKE Position Statement: The Hard Truth About Reform and Responsibility

At the Conservative TAKE, we believe in confronting uncomfortable truths. The recent actions by Elon Musk at X (formerly Twitter) and the reforms championed by President Trump are necessary responses to decades of fiscal irresponsibility and systemic corruption. While it's distressing to witness job losses, these challenges should have been addressed half a century ago. Instead, politicians from both parties deferred action, enriching themselves at the nation's expense.

Our national debt now exceeds $34 trillion, with an annual deficit of approximately $1.7 trillion. Continuing on this trajectory risks economic collapse within the next decade, jeopardizing the value of the U.S. dollar and imperiling retirement savings like 401(k)s and Social Security. Alarmingly, members of Congress earn a salary of $174,000, yet many amass fortunes worth tens of millions during their tenure, raising serious ethical concerns.

It's easy to direct frustration toward figures like Trump or Musk, but consider the following:

  1. Reform is imperative—Ignoring the problem only exacerbates it.
  2. Trump campaigned on addressing these issues—His 2024 victory over Kamala Harris, with a popular vote margin of over 2 million votes, reflects a mandate for change.
  3. Both parties have pledged reform for decades—Yet systemic issues persist, and self-enrichment continues unabated.
  4. Proactive measures now will mitigate future hardships—Delaying action will only lead to more severe consequences.

Federal employees are understandably affected during this transition. It's important to recognize that upon their hiring, they take an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Transitioning from expansive government roles to the private sector can enhance our economy through increased efficiency and productivity driven by market incentives.

The root cause of our current predicament lies in over 70 years of inadequate leadership. We must hold accountable those who promised reform but failed to deliver. The American populace deserves a government that serves its citizens, not one that exploits taxpayer resources for personal gain.

The path to recovery is challenging, but it's essential to rectify past missteps to secure our nation's future. The era of excuses has ended.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals