the Conservative TAKE
Politics • Culture • News
Kamala Harris and Willie Brown: The Scandalous Relationship We Must Not Ignore
The 1995 ABC News Moment: "Are You His Daughter?"
September 10, 2024
post photo preview
Kamala Harris, then 30, and Willie Brown, then 61, are seen together after they started dating in 1994
In 2020, former Mayor Willie Brown acknowledged having an extramarital affair with Kamala Harris.

In today's political climate, where every aspect of a public figure's past is scrutinized, it's entirely appropriate to examine Kamala Harris' relationship with former California State Assembly Speaker Willie Brown. Harris' political ascent, tied to her personal relationship with the powerful politician, raises legitimate questions about her rise in San Francisco politics and the path that eventually led her to the vice presidency.

Kamala Harris was 29 when she began a relationship with Brown, who was 60 at the time. Brown, often referred to as "The Godfather" of San Francisco politics, wielded enormous power and influence. Their relationship was far from a simple personal affair; it coincided with significant advancements in Harris’ political career, many of which can be traced directly to Brown’s backing.

How Brown Elevated Harris' Career

Willie Brown's support for Harris wasn't subtle. He appointed her to two lucrative state commission positions during the 1990s, one of which was the California Medical Assistance Commission, where she earned over $70,000 a year, equivalent to $120,000 today. Harris held that role from 1994 to 1998, attending only two meetings per month. Critics in the Democratic Party expressed frustration, not only because Harris lacked the necessary qualifications for the role, but because such positions were typically reserved for seasoned political allies who had helped keep Brown in power. Instead, he gave it to Harris, who was his girlfriend at the time.

November 8th, 1995 edition of the San Luis Obispo County Telegram Tribune.


Willie Brown, Kamala Harris' much older lover, not only gifted her a BMW but also helped her secure a second state commission position, significantly boosting her salary and establishing her both financially and politically. This infusion of wealth and political influence laid the groundwork for Harris to advance in her career, positioning her for greater success as she climbed the ranks within California's Democratic Party.

Breaking Up, But Not Letting Go

While their romantic relationship ended shortly after Brown was elected mayor of San Francisco in 1995, his influence on Harris’ political life did not. Even after their breakup, Brown played a significant behind-the-scenes role in Harris' campaign for San Francisco District Attorney in 2003. Brown is known to have used his connections and political clout to steer wealthy donors toward Harris, helping her secure the financial backing needed to launch her successful bid for the DA's office.

Vice President Kamala Harris has long denied that her relationship with former San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, 31 years her senior, was the defining factor in her political rise. Pictured together in 1995.

Harris, however, publicly distanced herself from Brown as she pursued her own political ambitions. In a now-famous interview with San Francisco Magazine, Harris stated that Willie Brown’s career was "over" and made it clear that it was now her time to shine. This cold dismissal of the man who had greatly advanced her political career is emblematic of Harris’ strategy to shed associations with political figures that could hinder her climb.

A Tough Prosecutor? Not So Fast

Throughout her career, Harris has portrayed herself as a tough prosecutor who fought against predators, fraudsters, and others who broke the law. However, her tenure as San Francisco District Attorney and later as California Attorney General is marked by controversy. Critics argue that Harris was more interested in advancing her political career than serving justice. Reports from both left-leaning and mainstream media have highlighted instances where she failed to properly prepare for her roles, such as not reading critical briefing materials.

Harris’ reputation as a prosecutor also included mixed signals, as she advocated for policies that were tough on crime in some cases but lenient on certain offenders in others. As vice president, this inconsistency has been mirrored by her struggles to find footing in national politics.

The 1995 ABC News Segment: A Viral Moment Revived Ahead of the Debate

The 1995 ABC News Segment - "Are you his daughter?"

In a notable 1995 ABC News segment, a reporter questioned Willie Brown about his relationship with Kamala Harris during his time as California State Assembly Speaker. The reporter, noticing Harris frequently by Brown's side at political events, bluntly asked if she was his daughter. Brown chuckled and clarified that Harris was not his daughter but acknowledged their relationship. This public moment highlighted the noticeable age gap between the two and underscored the influence Brown had in promoting Harris within California’s political scene, which raised eyebrows even at the time. Interestingly, this clip has recently resurfaced and is going viral ahead of tonight’s debate, reigniting conversations about the early days of Harris’ political career and the role Brown played in her rise to power.

placeholder


The Willie Brown Connection: Still Relevant

When discussing Harris’ political career, the influence of Willie Brown remains a crucial component. Despite attempts to distance herself from him, the facts of how she got her start cannot be ignored. Their relationship opened doors for her and propelled her into the upper echelons of California’s political scene. The notion that this should not be discussed, or that it is irrelevant to her current position, is misguided. When any political figure's rise to power involves close relationships with influential individuals, it’s natural—and fair—to question the dynamics at play.

In the context of Kamala Harris’ political ascent, her relationship with Willie Brown isn’t just a personal affair from the past; it’s part of the narrative that shaped her career. It’s worth noting that Harris has had to compete mostly within the liberal strongholds of California, where her competition largely consisted of other Democrats. She has never had to face the kind of fierce political opposition that figures like Donald Trump have thrived on, particularly in high-stakes national contests.

As we look to future elections, Harris’ past, including her relationship with Willie Brown, will continue to be a relevant discussion point for those assessing her qualifications and ability to lead. If anything, it raises essential questions about the nature of political power, influence, and personal ambition in American politics. Kamala Harris’ journey shows how powerful connections and strategic relationships can be just as influential as policy stances and public service records. It’s not shaming to ask these questions—it's simply holding leaders accountable for the entirety of their public life.

And in Kamala Harris' case, that public life cannot be fully understood without examining how she got her start with the help of Willie Brown.

Source: Megyn Kelly and Charlie Spiering Podcast Discussion

This information is sourced from a discussion between Megyn Kelly and Charlie Spiering, author of Amateur Hour, on Kelly's podcast from July 23, 2024. In their conversation, they explored Kamala Harris' early political career and the pivotal role Willie Brown, California’s most powerful politician at the time, played in advancing her. Kelly and Spiering highlighted how Harris' relationship with Brown led to key political appointments and lucrative opportunities that significantly shaped her rise within the Democratic Party.

community logo
Join the the Conservative TAKE Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Odds of Love: A Probability Study Proving Jasmine Crockett’s Race Baiting Ignores the Real Challenges of Finding a Conservative Black Match

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Representative Jasmine Crockett’s recent criticism of Representative Byron Donalds for marrying a white woman highlights a regressive mindset steeped in ignorance and racial bias, casting doubt on her ability to engage with the diverse realities of American life.

https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1906302926571618409

By implying that Donalds has been “whitewashed” through his interracial marriage, Crockett clings to outdated stereotypes that dictate racial loyalty over personal agency, exposing her own hypocrisy in advocating for equality while policing others’ private choices. This narrow perspective stands in stark contrast to the evolving dynamics of relationships across racial lines, as evidenced by a probabilistic analysis of partner selection among conservative Black individuals. To illustrate the complexity of such dynamics, consider the following study estimating the likelihood of a conservative Black man finding and marrying a conservative Black woman who aligns with his values—a scenario Crockett might deem more “acceptable,” yet one fraught with its own...

00:00:46
00:01:20
Biblical Citizenship in Modern America Commentary Ep14 - Understanding the Times 3

00:00 Introduction
02:03 Week 13 review
04:56 Our Current Education System
05:59 Six Verbs for Advancing Truth in the Country
09:08 What Our Elected Officials Don't Know About America
10:44 The Foundation of Law
12:12 Who Were the Signers of the Declaration of Independence?
13:52 Benjamin Rush
15:44 What is Patriotism?
18:34 Summary of Workbook

00:25:36
MN: ICE is not LEAVING

The left is trying to make it seem like Trump is abandoning Minnesota, but that’s misleading. What’s actually happening is that the large-scale “Operation Metro Surge” is being wound down because its primary objectives were met. ICE is now shifting to a more targeted approach...picking up deportable individuals directly from prisons and jails or at the point of release...so the massive street-level surge is no longer necessary.
Tom Homan announced on February 12, 2026, that he proposed ending the surge operation, and Trump agreed. But that doesn’t mean enforcement is stopping. It means it’s transitioning from a peak deployment of thousands of agents to a smaller, more focused presence...closer to normal staffing levels.
The operation resulted in over 4,000 arrests, many involving individuals with criminal records. Homan also emphasized improved cooperation with Minnesota state and local authorities, giving ICE greater access to county jails and state prisons. That ...

The left is trying to make it seem like Trump is abandoning Minnesota, but that’s misleading. What’s actually happening is that the large-scale “Operation Metro Surge” is being wound down because its primary objectives were met. ICE is now shifting to a more targeted approach...picking up deportable individuals directly from prisons and jails or at the point of release...so the massive street-level surge is no longer necessary.
Tom Homan announced on February 12, 2026, that he proposed ending the surge operation, and Trump agreed. But that doesn’t mean enforcement is stopping. It means it’s transitioning from a peak deployment of thousands of agents to a smaller, more focused presence...closer to normal staffing levels.
The operation resulted in over 4,000 arrests, many involving individuals with criminal records. Homan also emphasized improved cooperation with Minnesota state and local authorities, giving ICE greater access to county jails and state prisons. That ...

So far, President Trump, in the short time of his second stint, has delivered on every single promise of the America First coalition (most of which was codified in the OBBB), all but one. That remaining pillar represents perhaps the largest wing of the MAGA populist movement; the millions who want justice and accountability for the Deep State.

It seems Trump set a brilliant trap with his apparent ambivalence toward the Epstein files. Anyone paying attention, and not listening to the lamestream media, knows the exact opposite has been true for more than a decade. He has been orchestrating this moment. And now, people are already retiring, lawyering up, and running for cover as the latest email drops implicate not only the Clinton administration, but also Biden and even Obama.

The Democrats and their slimy media cronies just can’t help themselves. In trying to hurt Trump, they’ve unleashed the Kraken on their own allies; the very people who have lived in the shadows, protected from ...

DRAFT - A Necessary Decision: Why the Iran War Was a Risk Worth Taking

The current conflict with Iran did not emerge out of political convenience or election-year calculation. According to reporting and analysis discussed by Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck, the decision was driven by intelligence assessments that suggested Iran was approaching a dangerous threshold in its nuclear program and had definitively rejected negotiations to halt it.

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
7 Reasons Why Panicans SUCK!
Tucker, Massie, Candace, and the Rest Still Don’t Get It – Trump’s Tech War Is Delivering the Peace They Claim to Want

Let’s call it what it is.

The “Panicans” (those loud, fear-driven conservatives like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Col. Douglas Macgregor, Dave Smith, and Thomas Massie) suck at reading the room right now. They’re panicking like it’s 2003 all over again, screaming “forever war!” the second Trump hits Iran. They see missiles flying and immediately cry “Iraq! Neocons! Blood for oil!”

They’re not traitors. They’re just stuck in the past, blind to what’s actually happening, and their panic is actively hurting the America First movement at the exact moment we’re winning bigger than we have in decades.

Here’s the brutal truth they refuse to see: Trump isn’t fighting the old war. He’s ending the era of old wars. And if these Panicans would shut up for five minutes and look at the scoreboard, they’d realize this isn’t another trillion-dollar disaster . It’s the beginning of the first real peace era in our lifetime. Providence is showing up, and they’re too busy clutching their pearls to notice.

Here are 7 reasons why Panicans flat out suck.

Reason 1: They Suck Because They’re Fighting 2003 With 2026 Eyes


Panicans keep waving the bloody shirt of Iraq and Afghanistan. “Don’t get sucked in!” they yell. Seems like a cool story except that Trump isn’t doing any of that.

Operation Epic Fury didn’t send 150,000 troops to occupy Tehran. It didn’t promise democracy in a box or nation-building. It used:

  • Stealth fighters they never saw

  • Electronic warfare that blinded Iran’s entire radar grid with fake signals

  • AI targeting, precision missiles, decoy drones

Iran’s air defenses collapsed in hours. Missile factories, drone plants, command bunkers — gone. The regime’s ability to pay its terrorists and project power is being ripped out by the roots. No occupation. No forever war. Just surgical system collapse.

That’s the “techno whatever” Tucker mocks. Trump is winning with American brains and technology, not your kid’s blood in the sand. The Panicans can’t process this because their entire brand is built on hating the forever-war machine. They’re right to hate it but they’re too dumb (or too lazy) to see Trump already killed that machine.

Reason 2: They Suck Because They Ignore That Real Iranians (Starting With the Kurds) Are Already Fighting

While the Panicans cry about “no more boots on the ground,” Trump already solved that problem the smart way.

The Kurds have now launched ground operations inside Iran with major U.S. weapons. The U.S. has been quietly arming **thousands** of Kurdish fighters inside Iran since the 12-Day War in June 2025. These are the same battle-hardened Kurds Trump armed during his first term (the absolute legends who helped wipe out ISIS).

The Kurds are fierce, pro-American fighters. They’re not just one group. They are an ethnic mix that includes Sunni Muslims, Christians, Jews, and many secular people. They’re famous for their religious tolerance in a region full of fanatics.

Democrats have betrayed the Kurds repeatedly in the past. Trump never did.

And it’s not just the Kurds. The U.S. is also arming other anti-regime groups inside Iran. Reliable polling shows that about 80% of Iran’s population opposes the lunatic mullah regime.

Translation: There is zero need for American troops on the ground. We have a population inside Iran that is able, willing, and eager to fight. Team Trump has planned this like a masterclass.

The Panicans are so addicted to their Iraq trauma that they can’t see the obvious: Trump turned Iran’s own people (starting with the Kurds) into the ground force so American soldiers don’t have to be.

Reason 3: They Suck Because They Hate Trump So Much They Refuse to Read the Room

Panicans are so consumed by their seething Trump hatred that they literally refuse to look at the actual numbers on issues they personally don’t like. CBS just dropped a bombshell poll showing 76% of Americans support Operation Epic Fury if it lasts only days or weeks. That’s a straight-up 80/20 landslide, higher than support for border security.

The only hesitation in earlier polls came from fears this would become another forever war (exactly what the Panicans are screaming). But Trump promised short and decisive, the missiles are already decaying at 70-75% per day, and the American people are on board in a massive way. The Panicans don’t care. They’d rather doom-post, call it Trump’s biggest betrayal, and fracture the MAGA coalition than admit the public is with him and the plan is working exactly as sold.

They are too busy hating Trump to read a room that’s cheering.

Reason 4: They Suck Because They Think It’s “Just Iran”

The Panicans act like this is some isolated dust-up in the desert.

Iran isn’t a single country problem. It’s the **keystone** propping up the entire anti-American axis:

  • Funding Putin’s drones that slaughter Ukrainians

  • Keeping Maduro’s socialist hellhole alive in Venezuela

  • Arming every terror proxy from Hezbollah to the Houthis

Smash Iran’s oil money, factories, and command network and the whole thing cracks: Russia gets weaker in Ukraine, Venezuela’s regime starves, China loses its cheap distraction in the Middle East.

And guess what already happened? China (the same China buying 90% of Iran’s oil) quietly backed off and refused to send advanced weapons. Why? Because half their own oil comes from the Gulf. Iran is now alone. Game over.

The Panicans missed that. Too busy doom-scrolling old Iraq footage.

Reason 5: They Suck Because They’re Missing the Sunni-Israel Miracle

Sunni Arab powerhouses (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Jordan, Egypt) are now openly working with Israel. Trade deals. Tech sharing. Intelligence. Joint ops against the same Iranian threat. The Abraham Accords didn’t just survive, they’re exploding into something historic.

A generation ago this was impossible. Sunni Muslims and Jews teaming up? Now it’s happening because they all finally agree: the real enemy is Tehran, not each other.

This isn’t endless war. This is the birth of a new Middle East with energy corridors, trade routes, tech hubs linking three continents. Iran was the last roadblock. Remove it, and the region stops burning and starts building.

The Panicans are still screaming “Israel lobby!” while Sunni kings shake hands with Netanyahu. Embarrassing.

Reason 6: They Suck Because They Can’t See the Global Dominoes

  • Russia loses its drone factory and oil partner → Ukraine war gets easier to end.

  • Venezuela loses its Iranian lifeline → Maduro’s days are numbered.

  • China loses its Middle East distraction → Pacific focus shifts in America’s favor.

One tech-driven offensive against Iran weakens four enemies at once and without a single new ground war to boot. That’s masterclass foreign policy. That’s the America First Trump promised.

But the Panicans can’t see past their own fear. They’d rather own Trump than admit we’re winning.

Reason 7: They Suck Because They’re Blind to Providence

Look at the way this is unfolding. China is stepping back at the perfect moment, proxy armies crumbling, Sunni nations rushing into Israel’s arms, Kurds fighting on the ground, and 21st-century tech making old wars obsolete. This doesn’t feel like random luck.

It feels like the pieces were placed there for exactly this moment.

Trump (the same man who recently almost had his head blown off - talk about providence) said he’d end the forever wars. He’s doing it by making the bad guys collapse on their own dime, while empowering local allies like the Kurds. Time after time the breaks keep going his way.

Whether you call it strategy, luck, or straight-up divine timing, something bigger is at work. The Panicans are too cynical and too online to feel it.

the Conservative TAKE…

The Panicans suck because they’re still living in the Bush-era trauma while Trump is already in the victory lap.

They want peace? This is how you actually get it. You get it with smart power, technology, alliances with groups like the Kurds, and letting regional players finish the job.

Trump isn’t starting another war.
He’s ending the age of them.

And if the Panicans don’t snap out of their panic spiral and get on board, history will remember them as the conservatives who cried wolf right when the wolf finally got slaughtered. Slaughtered by the aforementioned American technology, Kurdish fighters, Arab-Israeli alliances, and one man who actually kept his promises.

This isn’t Iraq 2.0.
This is the peace era 1.0.

Wake up, Panicans. Or stay irrelevant. Choose wisely.

Read full Article
DRAFT - Operation Epic Fury and the Remaking of the Middle East

To be released after noon of 3/2/26

**DRAFT**


On February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched one of the most coordinated and strategically ambitious military campaigns in modern Middle Eastern history. The U.S. named its campaign Operation Epic Fury. Israel called its parallel effort Operation Roaring Lion. But this was not simply another round of airstrikes. It was a systemic attempt to decapitate, degrade, and potentially collapse the core of the Iranian regime.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals