Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
SDS radical quotes
the Conservative TAKE
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Odds of Love: A Probability Study Proving Jasmine Crockett’s Race Baiting Ignores the Real Challenges of Finding a Conservative Black Match
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Representative Jasmine Crockett’s recent criticism of Representative Byron Donalds for marrying a white woman highlights a regressive mindset steeped in ignorance and racial bias, casting doubt on her ability to engage with the diverse realities of American life.
https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1906302926571618409
By implying that Donalds has been “whitewashed” through his interracial marriage, Crockett clings to outdated stereotypes that dictate racial loyalty over personal agency, exposing her own hypocrisy in advocating for equality while policing others’ private choices. This narrow perspective stands in stark contrast to the evolving dynamics of relationships across racial lines, as evidenced by a probabilistic analysis of partner selection among conservative Black individuals. To illustrate the complexity of such dynamics, consider the following study estimating the likelihood of a conservative Black man finding and marrying a conservative Black woman who aligns with his values—a scenario Crockett might deem more “acceptable,” yet one fraught with its own...
00:00:46
Biblical Citizenship in Modern America Commentary Ep14 - Understanding the Times 3
00:00 Introduction
02:03 Week 13 review
04:56 Our Current Education System
05:59 Six Verbs for Advancing Truth in the Country
09:08 What Our Elected Officials Don't Know About America
10:44 The Foundation of Law
12:12 Who Were the Signers of the Declaration of Independence?
13:52 Benjamin Rush
15:44 What is Patriotism?
18:34 Summary of Workbook
00:25:36
I'm sick of watching the Left destroy everything in American culture....Star Wars, Star Trek, Indiana Jones, The Batman, The Lord of the Rings, Marvel, even Ghostbusters...just to name a few. Once-great franchises are now shells of their former selves, sacrificed at the altar of identity politics and forced narratives.
And now they've ruined Superman, turning him into an effeminate loser who gets beat up, beat down, emasculated, upstaged, disrespected, and marginalized in his own film.
Oh...and let’s not forget how sexual deviant James Gunn rewrote Superman’s origin story to reflect his own twisted worldview.
Spoiler alert: Superman’s parents now send him to Earth not to be a beacon of hope, but essentially to become a manwhore bent on enslaving the planet.
As of noon EST on Tuesday, July 15, 2025, the MAGA movement has already notched several notable wins, with 12 hours still left in the day for more potential victories. Below is a detailed summary of the reported MAGA wins based on recent posts from X, highlighting their significance and context. These wins range from substantial policy and economic achievements to symbolic or humorous political jabs, reflecting the broad spectrum of what MAGA supporters celebrate.
Summary of MAGA Wins Today (so far...)
1. $75 Billion AI and Energy Investment in Pennsylvania
- Details: President Donald Trump is set to announce a massive $75 billion investment in artificial intelligence and energy infrastructure in Pennsylvania during an event in Pittsburgh at the inaugural Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit at Carnegie Mellon University. This figure aligns with reports from Axios and Reuters, which cite a slightly lower $70 billion but confirm the scale of the investment, aimed at bolstering ...
Why the Epstein File Strategy Might Be Trump’s Masterstroke - 10 Reasons
“President Trump—we are ready to move the court tomorrow to unseal the grand jury transcripts.” – Attorney General Pamela Bondi
“Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval. This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now! ” – President Trump
These statements mark the beginning of a pivotal shift not just in the Epstein investigation, but in the broader battle between the MAGA movement and the entrenched political-media complex often referred to as the Deep State.
This is an evolving story, but all signs suggest this move was anything but spontaneous. It looks increasingly like a deliberate, well-timed maneuver aimed at reshaping the national conversation just as the 2025 election cycle gains momentum.
Rather than rush to release evidence during a media storm or while public focus was elsewhere, Trump and his allies waited. They allowed the Left and the press to burn themselves out with partisan stunts. Now, with the public demanding truth and transparency, the Epstein documents are poised to take center stage; their release could change everything.
The Wall Street Journal recently published a story claiming Trump had sent a bizarre letter to Epstein, complete with crude drawings, an accusation Trump flatly denied. In a Truth Social post, he fired back:
"The Wall Street Journal printed a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein. These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don’t draw pictures. I told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn’t print this Fake Story. But he did, and now I’m going to sue his ass off, and that of his third rate newspaper."
The timing of this (right before the push to unseal grand jury documents) suggests an effort to preemptively smear Trump before the facts come out. But the smear may have backfired, strengthening his legal position and increasing public skepticism toward legacy media.
Now, with momentum on his side, Trump is calling for full transparency, and the political fallout could be massive.
Here are our top reasons why Trump's handing of this, might be his masterstroke.
1. Forces the Media Into a Corner
After wall-to-wall coverage of partisan distractions, the mainstream press is now boxed in. They must either cover the Epstein revelations or expose their own bias by ignoring them. Either outcome benefits MAGA by revealing the truth or revealing the media's complicity.
2. Validates Trump’s Longstanding Actions Against Epstein
Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago in 2004, reported him in 2005, and led the charge to bring him down during his presidency. The unsealed documents will reinforce Trump’s role as a rare figure in power who took Epstein seriously from the beginning.
3. Exposes Fake MAGA and Grifters
In the lead-up to this release, opportunists posing as “influencers” pushed fake narratives, turned on Trump, or stayed silent. Now their motivations are being exposed. This will further strengthen the authentic MAGA base.
4. Positions Trump as the Leader of Justice and Truth
With the DOJ now moving to unseal the grand jury transcripts at Trump’s request, he appears not only unafraid of scrutiny but demanding transparency. It’s a stark contrast to Democrats who’ve long worked to bury the Epstein story.
5. Reawakens the Demand for Accountability
The American people are starved for justice, especially on matters involving elites and exploitation. The Epstein case hits that nerve. MAGA stands to gain as the only political movement consistently demanding answers.
6. Mobilizes the Base With Fresh Momentum
After years of investigations, indictments, and distractions, the MAGA movement finally gets an offensive win. The unsealing of these files reinvigorates grassroots supporters and draws attention back to the corruption they’ve warned about for years.
7. Discredits the Left’s Weaponization of Government
While Democrats use the DOJ and media to attack political enemies, Trump uses legal means to bring sunlight to dark places. This moment underscores the difference and proves MAGA’s claims of weaponized justice weren't just rhetoric.
8. Potentially Opens the Door to Lawsuits Against Media Outlets
If the documents reveal that media outlets suppressed or misrepresented key facts about Epstein, they could face serious legal exposure. Trump may gain standing to pursue new defamation lawsuits, something he’s already proven effective at. In 2023, Trump won a defamation case against CNN, leading to a quiet settlement where the network paid damages. In another victory, the Washington Post was forced to settle and contribute funds toward Trump’s presidential library after publishing false claims tied to the Russia hoax. These cases show he’s not only willing to fight; he’s capable of winning. If major outlets are caught downplaying or covering up the Epstein network while attacking Trump, more lawsuits could follow and this time, the facts may be even more explosive.
9. Builds the Case for Dismantling the Deep State
The Epstein files won’t just name names, they’ll likely point toward systemic failures (or cover-ups) inside federal agencies. This feeds momentum for deep structural reform which is a key pillar of the MAGA platform.
10. Sparks National Reflection on Suppressed Truths
This moment gives the public a reason to revisit other stories the media buried or twisted. From election integrity to COVID, this opens the floodgates for reexamining the last decade’s biggest lies.
BONUS. Unifies the Movement Across Factions
From grassroots activists to disillusioned independents, the release of these files could be the catalyst that re-energizes the MAGA coalition and draws in new supporters outraged by elite cover-ups. Even CNN was forced to admit that Trump’s poll numbers rose following the Epstein fiasco. This is a clear sign that public sentiment is shifting. As the truth emerges, the movement grows.
In the end...
The unsealing of the Epstein grand jury transcripts isn’t just about exposing one predator. Moreover, it is about revealing the corrupt system that protected him, ignored his victims, and smeared those who sought the truth.
By allowing the media frenzy and partisan noise to peak before acting, Trump may have executed a political masterstroke. What was once mocked as conspiracy theory is now becoming verifiable fact, positioned to dominate the headlines.
If this was his plan all along, it could go down as one of the most strategic plays of his career, not just vindicating his stance, but delivering a decisive blow to the Deep State and rallying the MAGA movement around a renewed call for justice.
Note: This is a developing story but one thing is already clear:
We only know about Epstein's atrocities is because of Trump.
Here’s the timeline:
2004 – Banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago
2005 – Reported Epstein’s behavior to authorities
2009 – Cooperated with Epstein victims’ lawyer
2017 – Signed Executive Order targeting human trafficking
2019 – Epstein arrested during Trump’s presidency
2019 – FBI raided Epstein’s island
2025 – Epstein files released (Phase One)
2025 – Calls on DOJ to release Phase Two
White Paper: Kash Patel’s Role in Uncovering the Spygate Scandal and the Release of Classified Information
Executive Summary
This white paper provides a comprehensive analysis of an exclusive interview conducted by The Epoch Times with Kash Patel, a former Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutor during the Obama administration, who played a pivotal role in uncovering the Spygate scandal. Recruited by Congressman Devin Nunes, Patel led the House Intelligence Committee’s investigation into the FBI’s handling of the Russia probe, particularly the use of the Steele dossier in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) application targeting the 2016 Trump campaign. Later, as Principal Deputy to Acting Director of National Intelligence Ric Grenell, Patel facilitated the declassification and release of critical documents, transcripts, and text messages, enabling public access to evidence of government malfeasance. This paper details Patel’s investigative process, the obstacles he faced, the legal mechanisms used to release confidential information, and the broader implications of his findings for government accountability and public trust.
Introduction
The Spygate scandal refers to allegations of misconduct by the FBI, DOJ, and other entities in their use of unverified intelligence to surveil associates of the 2016 Trump presidential campaign. Central to this controversy was the Steele dossier, a document compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, funded by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hillary Clinton’s campaign through intermediaries. Kash Patel, a former DOJ terrorism prosecutor, was instrumental in investigating these allegations. His work with the House Intelligence Committee under Congressman Devin Nunes and later at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) exposed significant abuses of power, including the misuse of FISA processes and the withholding of exculpatory evidence.This white paper examines Patel’s contributions, drawing from his interview with The Epoch Times’ American Thought Leaders, hosted by Jan Jekielek. It outlines the origins of the investigation, the challenges encountered, the legal and ethical processes for declassifying information, and the broader implications for transparency and accountability in U.S. governance.
Background:
Kash Patel’s Career and RecruitmentKash Patel, a first-generation Indian American, began his career as a public defender before serving as a DOJ terrorism prosecutor during the Obama administration. His expertise in FISA applications and collaboration with the FBI and intelligence community made him a valuable asset for Congressman Devin Nunes, who recruited him in April 2017 to join the House Intelligence Committee. Patel’s role was to lead an investigation into allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 election and the FBI’s handling of the Trump-Russia probe, particularly following the public release of the Steele dossier in January 2017.Patel’s background gave him unique insight into DOJ and FBI processes, particularly the rigorous standards required for FISA applications. His familiarity with these procedures allowed him to identify discrepancies in the FBI’s use of the Steele dossier, which became a cornerstone of the Spygate investigation.
The Spygate Investigation:
Key FindingsOrigins and ObjectivesThe House Intelligence Committee’s investigation aimed to determine whether there was evidence of conspiracy, collusion, or coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia. Patel approached this task methodically, focusing on acquiring primary documents, such as the FISA application targeting Carter Page, a Trump campaign associate, and conducting interviews with key witnesses.
The Steele Dossier and FISA ApplicationPatel’s review of the Carter Page FISA application revealed that the Steele dossier was the primary basis for the surveillance warrant, despite its lack of corroboration. Typically, FISA applications are comprehensive, supported by credible witnesses and hard evidence. However, Patel found the dossier’s allegations unsubstantiated, with no additional evidence to support claims of Trump-Russia collusion. This discovery raised concerns about the FBI’s due diligence and potential bias in the application process.
Following the MoneyPatel employed a “Prosecution 101” approach: follow the money. Through a source, the investigation identified financial transactions linking Fusion GPS, the firm hired by the DNC and Clinton campaign, to Christopher Steele. The DNC and Clinton campaign paid over $160,000 through the law firm Perkins Coie to Fusion GPS, which in turn compensated Steele for compiling the dossier. This financial trail confirmed the dossier’s political origins, undermining its credibility as an intelligence source.Witness InterviewsPatel and his team interviewed approximately 60 witnesses, including former attorneys general, senior DOJ and FBI officials, and intelligence community leaders.
Each was asked a precise, legally formulated question: “Do you have any information that the Trump candidacy and his team colluded, conspired, or coordinated with the Russian government?” All witnesses, under oath, answered “no,” contradicting public narratives propagated by some media outlets and Democratic officials.The Nunes MemoIn January 2018, the House Intelligence Committee released the Nunes memo, a document summarizing the investigation’s findings. The memo was carefully crafted to include only verified information from witness interviews and DOJ/FBI documents, ensuring compliance with House rules for releasing classified information. It revealed that:
The Steele Dossier and FISA ApplicationPatel’s review of the Carter Page FISA application revealed that the Steele dossier was the primary basis for the surveillance warrant, despite its lack of corroboration. Typically, FISA applications are comprehensive, supported by credible witnesses and hard evidence. However, Patel found the dossier’s allegations unsubstantiated, with no additional evidence to support claims of Trump-Russia collusion. This discovery raised concerns about the FBI’s due diligence and potential bias in the application process.
Following the MoneyPatel employed a “Prosecution 101” approach: follow the money. Through a source, the investigation identified financial transactions linking Fusion GPS, the firm hired by the DNC and Clinton campaign, to Christopher Steele. The DNC and Clinton campaign paid over $160,000 through the law firm Perkins Coie to Fusion GPS, which in turn compensated Steele for compiling the dossier. This financial trail confirmed the dossier’s political origins, undermining its credibility as an intelligence source.Witness InterviewsPatel and his team interviewed approximately 60 witnesses, including former attorneys general, senior DOJ and FBI officials, and intelligence community leaders.
Each was asked a precise, legally formulated question: “Do you have any information that the Trump candidacy and his team colluded, conspired, or coordinated with the Russian government?” All witnesses, under oath, answered “no,” contradicting public narratives propagated by some media outlets and Democratic officials.The Nunes MemoIn January 2018, the House Intelligence Committee released the Nunes memo, a document summarizing the investigation’s findings. The memo was carefully crafted to include only verified information from witness interviews and DOJ/FBI documents, ensuring compliance with House rules for releasing classified information. It revealed that:
- The Steele dossier formed the bulk of the Carter Page FISA application.
- The FBI failed to disclose the dossier’s funding by the DNC and Clinton campaign to the FISA court.
- No evidence supported allegations of Trump-Russia collusion.
- Nellie Ohr’s Role: Ohr’s involvement with Fusion GPS raised concerns about conflicts of interest, given her husband’s senior position at the DOJ.
- FBI’s Admission: In a closed-door interview, then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe admitted that the FISA warrant on Carter Page would not have been sought without the Steele dossier.
- Exculpatory Evidence Withheld: The investigation uncovered instances where the FBI failed to disclose exculpatory evidence to the FISA court, violating legal standards.
- Kevin Kline Smith: An FBI lawyer was found to have doctored an email to support the FISA application, a serious breach of protocol.
- Limited Congressional Authority: Unlike his DOJ tenure, where grand jury subpoenas ensured document access, Congress lacked similar enforcement power. Patel noted that Congress was “where good investigations go to die,” as described by former Representative Trey Gowdy.
- Media Attacks: Democratic leaks to the media led to personal attacks on Patel, with articles labeling him a “genocidal dictator” and challenging his integrity. These attacks extended to his family, causing personal distress.
- Internal Resistance: DOJ and FBI officials, including Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, resisted the investigation. Rosenstein threatened to subpoena congressional records, an unprecedented move against constitutional oversight.
- Legal Challenges: Fusion GPS attempted to block a subpoena for financial records, leading to a months-long federal court battle.
Legal Release of Confidential InformationHouse Intelligence Committee ProcessThe release of the Nunes memo required navigating strict House rules for declassifying information. Patel and his team ensured the memo met these requirements by:
- Including only verified excerpts from witness interviews and official documents.
- Safeguarding sources and methods to protect national security.
- Obtaining approval from the House Intelligence Committee and the Speaker of the House.
- Identifying Relevant Materials: Patel targeted transcripts, text messages, and DOJ/FBI documents that had not been fully released or were heavily redacted.
- Legal and Ethical Review: Declassification required careful review to ensure compliance with national security protocols. Patel’s team removed redactions where possible without endangering sources or methods.
- Public Release: Documents, including witness transcripts and text messages between FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, were made public, allowing Americans to evaluate the evidence directly.
Impact and ImplicationsAccountabilityThe investigation led to the resignation or firing of 14 high-ranking officials, including the FBI director and deputy director, demonstrating some measure of congressional oversight. However, Patel expressed frustration that only one individual, Kevin Kline Smith, faced charges, suggesting a lack of internal accountability at the DOJ.Public AwarenessThe release of the Nunes memo and declassified documents educated the public about government misconduct, serving as a “civics lesson” on the U.S. system of governance. However, Patel acknowledged that a significant portion of the public remains unaware or skeptical of the findings.Erosion of TrustThe Spygate scandal highlighted systemic issues, including:
- FISA Abuse: The misuse of the FISA process to target a political campaign raised concerns about surveillance overreach.
- Media Bias: Contradictions between public statements and sworn testimony underscored the media’s role in promoting misleading narratives.
- Political Polarization: The investigation revealed stark differences in accountability standards between political parties, undermining public trust.
Broader Context:
Patel’s Philosophy and LegacyPatel’s first-generation American background, rooted in his family’s escape from a genocidal regime in Uganda, shaped his commitment to accountability and transparency. His tenure under both Obama and Trump administrations, culminating in historic appointments as the first person of color in senior counterterrorism and intelligence roles, reflects his dedication to public service.Patel’s philosophy emphasizes:
- Truth-Seeking: His insistence on releasing documents and transcripts allowed the public to evaluate evidence independently.
- Accountability: He views DOJ indictments as the ultimate form of closure for the Spygate scandal.
- Resilience: Despite media attacks and institutional resistance, Patel remained focused on the mission, supported by his team and family.
Conclusion:
Kash Patel’s investigation into the Spygate scandal exposed significant abuses of power within the FBI and DOJ, particularly in their handling of the Steele dossier and FISA applications. His strategic use of congressional subpoenas, the Nunes memo, and declassification efforts at ODNI ensured that critical evidence reached the public, fostering transparency and accountability. Despite facing formidable obstacles, including media defamation and internal resistance, Patel’s work highlighted the importance of rigorous oversight in safeguarding democratic institutions.The Spygate scandal serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of politicized intelligence and surveillance processes. While significant accountability was achieved through resignations and firings, the limited prosecution of wrongdoers underscores the need for stronger internal mechanisms at the DOJ. Patel’s legacy as a truth-seeker and advocate for public access to information continues to resonate, offering lessons for future investigations into government misconduct.
Recommendations
- Strengthen FISA Oversight: Congress should implement stricter guidelines to ensure FISA applications are supported by verified evidence and disclose potential biases.
- Enhance Congressional Subpoena Power: Reforms are needed to bolster Congress’s ability to acquire documents for oversight investigations.
- Promote Transparency: Agencies should streamline declassification processes to balance national security with public access to information.
- Address Media Accountability: Mechanisms to counter false narratives and protect individuals from defamation should be explored.
- Pursue DOJ Accountability: The Department of Justice should prioritize prosecuting individuals involved in misconduct to restore public trust.
References
- The Epoch Times, “American Thought Leaders: Kash Patel Interview,” March 2021.
- House Intelligence Committee, “Nunes Memo,” January 2018.
- Lee Smith, The Plot Against the President, 2019.
- Inspector General Report on FISA Abuses, December 2019.
- FindingManny.com, Garden City Film Festival, March 28, 2021.
Note: This white paper is based solely on the provided interview transcript and does not incorporate additional external sources unless explicitly mentioned in the interview. Source link below.
Why the Electoral Map Is Quietly Tilting Toward MAGA
While many are fixated on Epstein, Elon, and endless "influencer" drama, an important transformation is quietly reshaping America. Beneath the noise, a massive political realignment is underway—one that spells long-term disaster for the Democrat Party. Voter rolls are shifting red, blue states are bleeding residents, and the electoral map is being redrawn before our eyes.
According to political analyst and commentator Dr. Steve Turley, the United States is experiencing the largest realignment in voter registration and population trends since the New Deal, and virtually no legacy media outlet is covering it. But the data is clear: Democrats are bleeding voters, losing population, and forfeiting electoral power across the board. This, all while Republican strongholds surge.
The Voter Registration Landslide
Dr. Turley analyzed voter registration data from 30 states, totaling over 200 million potential voters. The trend? Unmistakable:
Pennsylvania: +5,000 Republicans / –3,000 Democrats → 8,000 net swing in just one month
North Carolina: +3,000 R / –5,000 D
Nevada: +1,000 R / –2,000 D
New Mexico & New Jersey: Both flipped 2,000-vote swings toward the GOP
Florida: A stunning +20,000 Republicans and –10,000 Democrats—a 30,000 swing in one month
Red states are getting redder. Purple states are turning red. And even historically blue states like New Mexico, New Jersey, and Maine are sliding right.
The Great Migration: Demographics Are Destiny
Why is this happening? Policy failure. High taxes, rising crime, collapsing cities, and housing unaffordability are driving families out of deep-blue states and into red ones.
Dr. Turley refers to these migrants as "leugees", left-leaning urban escapees whose political allegiances often shift right as they settle in more prosperous, law-abiding, lower-tax red states. And the effect is measurable.
If current migration continues through the 2030 census, projections show:
Texas and Florida gain 4 electoral votes each
California loses 4, New York loses 2
Result: A 20-vote swing in the Electoral College even before a single vote is cast
A Republican Electoral Lock?
Dr. Turley breaks it down: if Trump’s 2024 win netted him 312 electoral votes, under the projected 2030 map, that number rises to 332—without flipping a single new state. Meanwhile, Biden’s 306-vote win in 2020 would shrink to just 280.
Worse for Democrats, the current voter registration collapse means they likely won’t even win the same states. Turley predicts a 2028 map where:
Pennsylvania leans Republican
Florida and Texas are solid red
North Carolina and Georgia become likely GOP wins
New swing states emerge: Virginia, New Jersey, New Mexico, Minnesota, New Hampshire, and Maine
In other words, the Blue Wall strategy is no longer viable. Even if Democrats sweep Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, they still fall short of 270 electoral votes.
The Doom Loop: Blue States' Collapse Is Self-Inflicted
Turley outlines what he calls an electoral doom loop for Democrats:
Bad policies make blue states unaffordable and unsafe
Residents flee to red states
Blue states lose population and electoral votes
Democrats struggle to win national elections
They double down on the same failed policies
The cycle repeats
According to U.S. Census projections, the South will have 164 House seats by 2030, the most in American history. That shift alone makes the traditional Democrat path to 270 nearly impossible.
A Political Earthquake No One’s Reporting
While corporate media stays silent, this realignment is redrawing the political map before our eyes. As Dr. Turley puts it: “This is the biggest political story that nobody's talking about.” And he's right.
If the data holds, we’re witnessing the beginning of a long-term populist-nationalist majority, one that transcends cycles and becomes structural. The electoral playing field is tilting. The red wave is not a headline; it’s a demographic inevitability.
In the end...
As distractions dominate the headlines, the real story is happening quietly. However, its consequences will be anything but subtle. The data is undeniable: America is undergoing a structural political realignment, and the direction is unmistakably red. Democrats are not just losing votes. They’re losing states, districts, and entire regions. Their policies have made blue states unlivable, prompting a mass migration that’s tipping the scales of power.
This is not about one election cycle. This is about a decade-long shift that is rewriting the rules of American politics. If the trends hold, the GOP is headed toward an electoral stronghold unseen in modern history. As Dr. Turley makes clear, we’re not watching a wave; we're watching a permanent shift. And those who ignore it will be the last to understand why they lost.
