the Conservative TAKE
News • Politics • Culture
How to Prove for Yourself That America Landed on the Moon—No NASA Required
September 23, 2024
post photo preview

Since the Apollo Moon landings, conspiracy theories and skepticism have swirled around the events, questioning whether humans really set foot on the lunar surface. However, with the right equipment and approach, you don’t need to take NASA’s word for it—you can prove the Moon landings yourself. Here’s how you can conduct your own experiments and put these conspiracy theories to rest, using science to confirm one of humanity’s greatest achievements.

Understanding the Lunar Retroreflectors

One of the clearest and most undeniable pieces of evidence that humans landed on the Moon is the presence of lunar retroreflectors. These reflective devices were left on the Moon’s surface during the Apollo 11, 14, and 15 missions. They are designed to reflect laser beams back to Earth, allowing scientists to measure the distance between the Earth and the Moon with incredible precision. The fact that these retroreflectors remain operational today offers anyone with the right tools a chance to verify for themselves that something human-made sits on the Moon—something that could only have been placed there by astronauts.

Apollo_11_Lunar_Laser_Ranging_Experiment

 

Why Probes Alone Couldn’t Have Placed the Reflectors

One of the more common counter-arguments from Moon landing deniers is that these reflectors could have been placed on the Moon by unmanned robotic probes, not humans. However, this theory falls apart for several key reasons:

  1. Technological Limitations: During the Apollo era, the technology needed to remotely deploy precise instruments on another celestial body did not exist. The delicate alignment necessary for the retroreflectors to work as intended required direct human intervention.

  2. Evidence of Multiple Missions: Multiple Apollo missions placed retroreflectors at different locations on the Moon. The idea that robotic probes could have repeatedly and accurately landed, aligned, and deployed these instruments in such a coordinated way strains credibility.

  3. Photographic Evidence: The astronauts documented their activities with photographs and videos, which show them installing these reflectors and performing other tasks on the lunar surface. Denying this evidence requires ignoring a huge amount of verifiable, publicly available footage.

How You Can Conduct a Retroreflector Experiment

If you’re serious about verifying the Moon landings for yourself, here’s how you can conduct a lunar laser ranging experiment to detect the retroreflectors placed by Apollo astronauts. The process involves a few key steps:

  1. Acquire a High-Powered Laser: You’ll need a laser that emits a strong and focused beam capable of reaching the Moon and reflecting back to Earth. The laser’s wavelength must be able to penetrate Earth’s atmosphere effectively.

  2. Use a Large Aperture Telescope: You’ll also need a telescope with a large enough aperture to accurately target the reflectors and detect the returning laser light.

  3. Employ a Precision Timing System: The time it takes for the laser beam to travel to the Moon and return is incredibly short and needs to be measured precisely using atomic clocks or similar systems.

  4. Install Proper Mounting and Alignment Systems: This equipment will help you aim the laser and telescope accurately, compensating for the relative movements of the Earth and Moon.

  5. Monitor Atmospheric Conditions: The Earth’s atmosphere can distort the laser’s path, so you’ll need to account for weather and atmospheric variables when conducting your experiment.

  6. Utilize Computational Tools: Software is available to calculate the exact distance to the Moon based on the time it takes for the laser to return and to help you process the data.

Where to Get the Equipment (see direct links below).

The necessary equipment can be obtained from specialized suppliers. Here’s a breakdown of where you can source the tools you need:

  • Lasers and Telescopes: Companies like Coherent, Spectra-Physics, Celestron, or Meade offer the appropriate lasers and telescopes.
  • Timing Systems and Electronics: Microsemi and Stanford Research Systems provide the precision timing systems required.
  • Mounting Systems: Astro-Physics and Losmandy offer the mounts needed for accurate alignment.
  • Atmospheric Tools: Vaisala and Licel provide the atmospheric monitoring tools necessary for the experiment.

    APOLLO collaboration photon pulse return times

While conducting a lunar laser ranging experiment requires access to specialized equipment, it is absolutely possible for anyone with the means and desire to personally verify that humans landed on the Moon. The retroreflectors left behind by the Apollo astronauts are still operational and have been used for decades by scientists around the world to measure the distance to the Moon. By conducting this experiment yourself, you can directly confirm one of humanity’s greatest achievements.


Our Conservative TAKE...

Why This Experiment Triggers Moon Landing Deniers 

So why is this “How to Prove for Yourself That America Landed on the Moon—No NASA Required” approach so triggering for Moon landing deniers? Simple—it takes the burden of proof off of NASA and places it squarely on them. They can rant all day about “so-called evidence” and point fingers at government agencies, but when they’re faced with a simple science experiment they can do themselves, they freeze. Why? Because deep down, they know that if they actually test the retroreflectors and get the undeniable results, their entire conspiracy-laden worldview will collapse. The thought of obtaining cold, hard, self-verified truth is terrifying for them because it eliminates the need for NASA as a scapegoat.

The beauty of this experiment is that it removes NASA from the equation entirely. The challenge is right there: “Prove it for yourself!” But they won’t, because if they did—and the results came back as expected—they’d have no choice but to admit that they were wrong. Not trying it just shows that they either don’t want the truth or they prefer to wallow in their baseless beliefs. And let’s be real: Nothing scares a Moon landing denier more than the possibility of being proven wrong by their own experiment.

 


 

LINKS TO SUPPLIERS (that offer the necessary lasers, telescopes, timing systems, mounting systems, and atmospheric tools for conducting a lunar laser ranging experiment)

Apollo 14 Lunar Ranging Retro Reflector (LRRR)

 

community logo
Join the the Conservative TAKE Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
00:01:20
Biblical Citizenship in Modern America Commentary Ep14 - Understanding the Times 3

00:00 Introduction
02:03 Week 13 review
04:56 Our Current Education System
05:59 Six Verbs for Advancing Truth in the Country
09:08 What Our Elected Officials Don't Know About America
10:44 The Foundation of Law
12:12 Who Were the Signers of the Declaration of Independence?
13:52 Benjamin Rush
15:44 What is Patriotism?
18:34 Summary of Workbook

00:25:36
FREE TO ALL MEMBERS - Biblical Citizenship in Modern America Commentary Ep01 - The Foundation

CHAPTERS
00:00 Introduction
02:43 Outline
05:14 The Great Commission
10:03 Workbook
29:40 The Monument of the Forefathers Introduction
30:54 Wrap Up

💌 Join our YT channel to get access to perks:
http://JOIN.theConservativeTAKE.com/

🚫Want UNCENSORED content? Join us on Locals.
http://locals.theConservativeTAKE.com/

📢the Conservative Take Channel
https://youtube.com/theConservativeTAKE

🌟DISCORD
http://discord.theConservativeTAKE.com


🔗LINKS:

http://discord.theConservativeTAKE.com


📖 Real Help
The Gospel in 4 Minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ty6jU3PFCds

The Holy Bible
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiXQmeuHTOY&list=PLblm4cSmwa-ufOiEYfLkO1sJv3IyrFOIQ

URL Source links can be found on our discord server (📒video-resources channel) or join or via signing up as a member on our website, links below. Both are free to sign-up. ...

00:33:06
Why This so-called “economic blackout” is DUMB - 6 Reasons

This so-called “economic blackout” is completely pointless for several reasons:

1️⃣ People Will Just Spend on Thursday or Saturday – A one-day boycott doesn’t actually hurt businesses in the long run. If someone needs gas, food, or groceries, they’ll just buy it the day before or after. This means total revenue for the week won’t change much, if at all.

2️⃣ Conservatives Will Overspend to Counter It – The majority of Americans lean conservative, and they oppose these leftist protest stunts. Instead of hurting big businesses, this boycott will likely backfire, as conservatives will deliberately spend MORE to neutralize the impact.

3️⃣ Big Businesses Won’t Care – Large corporations operate on long-term revenue trends, not single-day sales. A minor dip in transactions over 24 hours means nothing compared to quarterly profits. They’ll recoup any losses within days.

4️⃣ It Won’t "Shake Things Up" – The idea that this will somehow force corporations to ...

Is Zelensky Acting Like a Dictator?

President Zelensky has suspended elections, banned opposition parties, and cracked down on religious groups. President Trump has labeled him a "dictator without elections." Is Zelensky defending Ukraine or consolidating power? Let's take a closer look.

Suspension of Elections – Zelensky canceled Ukraine’s 2024 elections, citing martial law. While Ukraine is at war, democratic countries (like the U.S. during the Civil War or the UK in WWII) have still held elections. His refusal to allow them raises concerns about democracy.

Crackdown on Opposition – Zelensky banned multiple political parties (including the Opposition Platform – For Life, the second-largest party in parliament) and seized control of TV networks to consolidate power.

Persecution of Religious Leaders – The Ukrainian government has arrested clergy of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, accusing them of being pro-Russian, which critics say is an attack on religious freedom.

Western Money Misuse – Reports suggest that ...

The Kyle Suggs Show Livestream: The 2nd Inauguration of 47th President Trump
placeholder
post photo preview
Transparency Isn’t Pretty: The Truth About the Early Pam Bondi-Epstein Fallout
UPDATED - 2/28/25 11:23am EST

This is what transparency looks like. We said we wanted it, and now we have it. The upside? We get real-time updates instead of secrecy. The downside? We enter a fog of war, where narratives shift, unpredictable things happen, and mistakes and bad optics are inevitable. Case in point: influencers leaving the White House, all smiles, carrying binders. Given the sheer number of victims and the horrific nature of the crimes, it was an awful look. But this is what transparency means; we are seeing the process unfold in real time, flaws and all. You can’t have it both ways.

Social media influencers leaving the White House, all smiles, carrying binders.

Under Biden, we got nothing. If Kamala had won, Epstein wouldn’t even be a topic of discussion. Now, for the first time, there’s movement, and yet, instead of focusing on the bigger picture, people are obsessing over optics. That’s shortsighted. We need to judge this by actual results. Draining the swamp isn’t for the weak; it’s an ugly, drawn-out process, and those who expect it to be clean and flawless are setting themselves up for disappointment.

The Debrief article - Photo Credit: White House

If you really think about it, the only reason some people are upset is that this administration is being transparent. That transparency, however, comes with growing pains. Accountability is necessary, yes, but it must be done properly. We understand the frustration, but overreacting only plays into the hands of those who want to keep information hidden. The Deep State isn’t going to roll over; they will fight back, sabotage the process, and manipulate the narrative to make transparency itself look like a mistake. The goal is to smoke the rats out, and if we lose focus or react emotionally, we risk delaying and weakening that effort. This fight is much bigger than one press conference or one bad photo-op. What matters is real results, not distractions.

Attorney General Pam Bondi has accused the FBI's New York field office of withholding "thousands of pages" of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. Despite prior assurances that all pertinent files had been provided, Bondi was recently informed of the existence of additional undisclosed materials. In response, she has demanded that FBI Director Kash Patel ensure the complete set of Epstein files including all records, documents, audio and video recordings, and related materials be delivered to her office by 8:00 a.m. on February 28, 2025. Bondi has also directed Patel to conduct an immediate investigation into the FBI's failure to comply with her initial order, requiring a comprehensive report of findings and proposed personnel actions within 14 days. Director Patel has pledged full cooperation, stating, "There will be no cover-ups, no missing documents, and no stone left unturned."


This blatant obstruction by the FBI is exactly why draining the swamp is such an uphill battle. Corrupt institutions don’t just comply—they resist, delay, and cover their tracks. It takes time to root out bad actors and regain control as Elon Musk put it perfectly:

"Imagine if you were suddenly appointed AG or head of the FBI. You were just thrown on a ship with a hostile crew. Until you appoint some new crew members and figure out the ropes, you can’t steer the ship effectively. It’s literally impossible."

The swamp isn’t just a modern problem; it has been embedded in American politics for nearly two centuries. Martin Van Buren perfected the spoils system, where political loyalty mattered more than competence, laying the foundation for the bureaucratic machine we now call the Deep State. Over time, that system grew more powerful, more unaccountable, and more resistant to reform; it became a self-preserving monster, designed to protect itself at all costs.

Today’s Deep State is the culmination of generations of backroom deals, institutional rot, and entrenched elites who believe they are above the law. This was never going to be an easy fight, and anyone who expected a clean, mistake-free process was never serious about what this battle actually requires.

A proper understanding of history and perspective is crucial. Draining the swamp isn’t just about a few firings or high-profile arrests; it’s about dismantling a system that has survived, adapted, and thrived since the 1800s. This isn’t a sprint; it’s a war, and wars are messy.

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Media Is Lying: 2025 Is the Safest Year for Aviation in Decades

In an era where the media selectively amplifies certain narratives, it’s easy to overlook real, measurable improvements in public safety. One such overlooked fact is that the U.S. has experienced a dramatic improvement in aviation safety in early 2025, making it the safest start to a year in at least two decades.

Caption

The Numbers Don't Lie

A simple query on the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) database confirms this:

  • January 2024: 80 aviation accidents
  • February 2024: 93 aviation accidents
  • January 2025: 62 aviation accidents
  • February 2025 (as of 2/23/25): 37 aviation accidents

    The NTSB aviation accident database contains civil aviation accidents and selected incidents that occurred from 1962 to present within the United States, its territories and possessions, and in international waters. 

That means aviation accidents in January and February 2025 have been cut by more than half compared to the same period in 2024—a drastic and undeniable improvement.

Looking at the broader picture, in 2024, the U.S. saw over 1,800 crashes, accidents, and near-miss incidents, leading to 317 fatalities. Yet, if we isolate January 2024 and January 2025, it’s clear that 2025 has seen a significant decline in total aviation incidents.

This isn’t just an improvement over last year—it’s the lowest monthly accident rate in the last 20 years.

Why Aren't We Talking About This?

With such a remarkable improvement in safety, you might expect widespread coverage of this positive trend. Instead, mainstream media outlets have largely ignored these statistics. Why? Because good news doesn’t generate fear, controversy, or clicks. Instead, the media focuses on isolated incidents, distorting public perception and making aviation seem more dangerous than ever—when, in fact, the opposite is true.

The reality is clear: Americans flying in 2025 are safer than they’ve been in decades. Whether due to advancements in technology, improved safety regulations, or more effective oversight, the numbers speak for themselves.

Aviation in 2025: Safer Than Ever

The data proves it: air travel in the U.S. is safer in 2025 than it was at this time in 2024, and likely safer than at any point in the last 20 years. Unfortunately, this isn’t a headline you’ll see on the evening news. But for those paying attention, it's a reminder that despite the noise and distraction, real progress is happening—whether the media acknowledges it or not.

placeholder

Read full Article
the Conservative TAKE Position Statement: The Hard Truth About Reform and Responsibility

At the Conservative TAKE, we believe in confronting uncomfortable truths. The recent actions by Elon Musk at X (formerly Twitter) and the reforms championed by President Trump are necessary responses to decades of fiscal irresponsibility and systemic corruption. While it's distressing to witness job losses, these challenges should have been addressed half a century ago. Instead, politicians from both parties deferred action, enriching themselves at the nation's expense.

Our national debt now exceeds $34 trillion, with an annual deficit of approximately $1.7 trillion. Continuing on this trajectory risks economic collapse within the next decade, jeopardizing the value of the U.S. dollar and imperiling retirement savings like 401(k)s and Social Security. Alarmingly, members of Congress earn a salary of $174,000, yet many amass fortunes worth tens of millions during their tenure, raising serious ethical concerns.

It's easy to direct frustration toward figures like Trump or Musk, but consider the following:

  1. Reform is imperative—Ignoring the problem only exacerbates it.
  2. Trump campaigned on addressing these issues—His 2024 victory over Kamala Harris, with a popular vote margin of over 2 million votes, reflects a mandate for change.
  3. Both parties have pledged reform for decades—Yet systemic issues persist, and self-enrichment continues unabated.
  4. Proactive measures now will mitigate future hardships—Delaying action will only lead to more severe consequences.

Federal employees are understandably affected during this transition. It's important to recognize that upon their hiring, they take an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Transitioning from expansive government roles to the private sector can enhance our economy through increased efficiency and productivity driven by market incentives.

The root cause of our current predicament lies in over 70 years of inadequate leadership. We must hold accountable those who promised reform but failed to deliver. The American populace deserves a government that serves its citizens, not one that exploits taxpayer resources for personal gain.

The path to recovery is challenging, but it's essential to rectify past missteps to secure our nation's future. The era of excuses has ended.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals