Paul Ingrassia, a prominent attorney, communications expert, and thought leader, has shared his take on the 2024 presidential election through his widely-read Substack. Ingrassia’s commentary often gains attention on Truth Social, with endorsements from former President Donald Trump himself. A graduate of Fordham University and Cornell Law School, Ingrassia serves as Communications Director of the NCLU, a two-time Claremont Fellow, and a Board Advisor for both the NYYR Club and the Italian American Civil Rights League. His insights reflect a sharp understanding of politics, culture, and law, and he invites readers to follow him on X (formerly Twitter), Substack, Instagram, Truth Social, and Rumble.

The 2024 Election: A Triumph Against All Odds

Ingrassia describes the 2024 election as a landmark moment in American political history. According to his analysis, Donald Trump achieved an overwhelming victory with 77 million popular votes and 312 electoral votes, surpassing the achievements of any Republican president since George H.W. Bush. In grassroots terms, this victory eclipsed even Trump’s record-breaking performance in 2020, where he garnered 74 million votes. Yet, the context of this victory is what makes it especially miraculous.

Despite enduring multiple assassination attempts, baseless indictments, and relentless negative press, Trump prevailed. Ingrassia highlights how the media, Hollywood, academia, and other cultural institutions aligned against Trump, making his victory a testament to the enduring spirit of the American people and their commitment to constitutional self-governance.

The Ideological Divide: Constitutionalism vs. Globalism

Ingrassia frames the 2024 election as more than a political contest—it was a battle for the soul of America. On one side stood Trump, representing traditional American values and constitutional governance. On the other, Kamala Harris embodied the ideology of globalism, open borders, and Marxism, which Ingrassia argues has eroded America’s institutions and moral foundations over recent decades.

He points to historical warnings against foreign entanglements, such as George Washington’s Farewell Address, to underscore the dangers of globalist policies. The election, according to Ingrassia, reflected the American people’s recognition of their duty to reject tyranny and reclaim their national identity.

Overcoming Corruption to Secure a Popular Mandate

While Republicans now control both chambers of Congress, the presidency, and the Supreme Court, Ingrassia warns that this mandate was hard-earned in the face of rampant electoral fraud. He alleges that Democratic strongholds like Chicago, Philadelphia, and New York engaged in illegal ballot practices aimed at undermining Republican votes.

Trump’s victory, he argues, was not due to the eradication of systemic fraud but because he overcame it. Ingrassia calls this a "Herculean" accomplishment, especially given Trump’s weeks spent in courtrooms as a result of politically motivated charges.

The Fight Against Wokeism

Ingrassia views the 2024 election as a direct repudiation of modern liberalism and its obsession with equity and diversity at the expense of freedom and quality. He criticizes the social justice movement for fostering a culture of self-loathing, historical revisionism, and attacks on Christian morality. The American people, he contends, have rejected this ideology and its influence over institutions like Hollywood, education, and corporate HR departments.

He asserts that the next four years will involve rooting out this ideological "cancer" by dismantling entrenched bureaucracies like the Department of Justice and the Department of Education. The goal, Ingrassia argues, is to return power to constitutionally authorized entities and restore American civic health.

A New Era of Republican Governance

Ingrassia emphasizes that Trump’s victory is not merely political but represents a seismic ideological shift. He calls for structural reforms to protect free government and justice, warning against the dangers of weaponized institutions. Referring to Elon Musk’s term "Woke Mind Virus," Ingrassia believes the country must eradicate this ideology from public life to reclaim its founding principles.

He critiques the Left’s weaponization of justice, pointing to the prosecution of Trump and his supporters as evidence of an incompatible ideology that undermines constitutional freedoms. According to Ingrassia, such actions disqualify their movement from legitimate claims to power.

Reclaiming America’s Greatness

Paul Ingrassia argues that Trump’s victory is a rallying cry for Americans to reject globalism and wokeism and to embrace their constitutional inheritance. The 2024 election, he contends, is a defining moment for a nation at a crossroads, and the years ahead will determine whether America can fully reclaim its greatness.

For more insights like this, follow Paul Ingrassia on Substack, Truth Social, X, Instagram, and Rumble.

Objective:  

To return the Washington NFL team’s name to “Redskins” while maintaining the iconic Indian Head logo, in partnership with Native American communities, and building on the historical significance of the logo, which was created with input from Native American activists, including Walter “Blackie” Wetzel, a former Blackfeet Nation leader and friend of Jim Thorpe. The rebrand will honor the logo's origins while fostering positive partnerships, financial support, and cultural tributes.

1. Respecting the Legacy of the Indian Head Logo

Historical Context: The Indian Head logo was originally designed by Walter "Blackie" Wetzel, a Native American activist and former president of the National Congress of American Indians, as a respectful tribute to a real chief. The logo was meant to celebrate Native American identity and was presented to then owner Jack Kent Cooke and eventually to Robert F. Kennedy (RFK) Stadium to represent the pride of the team and Native communities.
  
Maintaining the Logo’s Legacy: The logo, which has historical significance, will remain central to the team’s identity. This ensures that the original intent of honoring Native American leaders and their heritage is respected, while the team continues to build on its legacy. Educational content on the logo’s origins will be integrated into the team’s website, social media, and gameday materials to ensure fans understand the importance and respect behind the symbol.

2. Partnership with Native American Tribes and Organizations

Cultural Oversight Committee: Establish a “Cultural Oversight Committee” composed of tribal leaders, historians, and Native American activists who will work with the team to ensure that the logo and the use of the “Redskins” name are respectful and empowering. This committee will ensure the brand reflects positive, culturally appropriate values.
  
Formal Tributes and Acknowledgments: Similar to the relationship between Florida State University and the Seminole Tribe, the team will enter into formal partnerships with specific tribes, ensuring the name and logo are used with full tribal consent. Tribes, in exchange, will have opportunities to promote cultural heritage during games and events.

3. Financial Contributions and Investment in Native American Communities

Revenue Sharing and Donations: A portion of the team’s profits from merchandise, ticket sales, and media rights using the “Redskins” name and Indian Head logo will be directed to support Native American communities. This could involve funding healthcare, education, and infrastructure improvements on reservations.
  
Team Foundation for Native American Initiatives: Establish the “Redskins Foundation for Native American Initiatives,” which will support programs in tribal communities. This could include economic development projects, scholarships, healthcare services, and cultural preservation initiatives.

Annual Native American Charity Game: Introduce an annual “Heritage Game” where a portion of ticket sales and all proceeds from a special line of merchandise go directly to Native American causes. The event will include pregame ceremonies featuring tribal leaders and cultural performances.

4. Cultural Tributes and GameDay Honors

Pre-Game Ceremonies: Before each home game, the team will host a ceremonial event, led by Native American leaders, to honor the tribes, elders, and warriors of the past. This could include blessings, traditional music, or cultural performances.
  
In-Game Recognition: Native American veterans, leaders, and athletes will be recognized throughout the season during games. This ensures that Native American contributions to the country, sports, and the military are highlighted in a positive light.

Team Captains and Symbolic Representation: Similar to Florida State's Osceola, the Washington team could introduce a symbolic figure, such as a tribal elder or representative, to lead the team out onto the field for ceremonial occasions.

5. Educational Initiatives and Public Awareness

Educating the Public: A comprehensive media and educational campaign will inform the public about the origins of the Indian Head logo and its connection to a real chief. By working closely with Native American leaders, the team will create content that highlights the respectful and intentional way the logo was created, including Walter Wetzel’s influence and his relationship with Jim Thorpe.
  
Heritage Exhibits at the Stadium: Create exhibits in the stadium that explore Native American history, culture, and the significance of the logo. The exhibit could feature items from the original presentation to RFK, Native American artifacts, and tributes to prominent Native American athletes, including Jim Thorpe, who was one of the greatest American athletes of all time.

School and Youth Outreach: Launch outreach programs in local schools that educate young fans about Native American history, culture, and the team's partnership with indigenous communities. The team could host events where Native American leaders visit schools to share their stories, ensuring future generations are aware of the importance of respecting the history behind the team’s name and logo.

6. Merchandising and Brand Representation

Authentic Merchandise Collaboration: Collaborate with Native American artists and designers to create exclusive merchandise, which will feature traditional designs and symbols integrated into the team’s logo and branding. A percentage of sales from this merchandise will go directly to supporting tribal communities.

Culturally-Inspired Uniforms: In addition to the main team uniforms, the Washington NFL team could introduce alternate uniforms or patches that incorporate designs inspired by Native American culture, created in consultation with the Cultural Oversight Committee. These could be worn during special games or events honoring Native American heritage.

 7. LongTerm Vision and Sustainability

Sustained Partnerships: Ensure that partnerships with Native American tribes are longterm, not merely symbolic. The team will commit to sustained financial support, continuous engagement with Native leaders, and an evolving relationship that adapts to the needs and desires of tribal communities over time.
  
Community Engagement: Host regular forums and town hall meetings where Native American leaders and community members can discuss the team's branding and how it can further support indigenous communities. These open discussions will ensure the team's relationship with Native American groups remains transparent, evolving, and beneficial.

Conclusion:

This proposal presents a vision for the Washington NFL team to return to the “Redskins” name while preserving the Indian Head logo, a symbol of pride created by Native American leaders. The plan ensures that the rebranding is deeply respectful, rooted in history, and beneficial to Native American communities through financial contributions, cultural tributes, and educational initiatives. By partnering with Native American tribes and honoring the legacy of figures like Jim Thorpe and Walter Wetzel, the team can create a positive and sustainable relationship that both honors and empowers Native American cultures.

Sunny Hostin’s recent on-air retraction regarding Matt Gaetz is more than just a moment of public correction—it’s a glaring example of how modern media personalities and outlets often engage in narratives of bias and misinformation. For years, platforms like The View, Morning Joe, and commentators such as Joy Reid and David Pakman have perpetuated a culture where truth is secondary to ideological storytelling. Hostin’s hesitance to address the facts on-air is emblematic of a broader issue: the mainstream media’s frequent dismissal of accountability when it contradicts their preferred narrative.

The History of Gaslighting and Smear Campaigns

Shows like The View have long been criticized for their one-sided portrayal of conservative voices, often using their platform to malign those on the right with little regard for factual accuracy. Sunny Hostin’s retraction over allegations against Matt Gaetz follows a long history of similar controversies on the program. Whether it’s Joy Behar’s repeated dismissals of facts that counter progressive ideologies or the panel’s collective mockery of conservative leaders, The View exemplifies a media culture that thrives on ideological conformity over honest reporting.

Take the smear campaign against Matt Gaetz. For months, he faced baseless accusations that were later proven unsubstantiated, yet the mainstream media, including Hostin, amplified the claims without hesitation. Gaetz, like many conservatives aligned with Trump, has been a frequent target of relentless attacks meant to discredit not just him but the broader movement he represents. This wasn’t an isolated case—public figures like Brett Kavanaugh, Justice Clarence Thomas, and others have endured similar trials by media, often based on little more than rumor and assumption.

The Role of Legal Intervention

Hostin’s retraction wasn’t voluntary; it came after legal pressure. This highlights another troubling trend: the increasing necessity of the legal system to enforce journalistic integrity. Ideally, media outlets would self-correct as part of their commitment to the truth. Instead, corrections only come when the threat of legal repercussions looms large.

Consider this: if the roles were reversed, and a conservative commentator had falsely accused a prominent Democrat of wrongdoing, the backlash would have been swift and deafening. The demand for apologies and retractions would echo across the media landscape, and cancellations would likely follow. Yet, when someone like Gaetz is targeted, the media either downplays their error or justifies it as part of a larger ideological war.

Double Standards in Media Accountability

The selective outrage from figures like Joy Reid or networks like MSNBC is impossible to ignore. Reid herself has a history of inflammatory and false statements, from perpetuating hoaxes about conservatives to dismissing scandals involving liberal figures. Meanwhile, Morning Joe routinely engages in fearmongering and speculative narratives about conservatives, all while maintaining an air of journalistic credibility. David Pakman, too, has built a following by framing conservatives as dangerous extremists, often glossing over the complexities of their positions.

The refusal of these figures to hold themselves to the same standard of truth they demand from their political opponents erodes trust in journalism and contributes to the growing polarization of public discourse.

The Fight for a Fair Media Landscape

For Trump supporters and conservatives, the Hostin retraction is a small yet significant victory in the larger battle for media fairness. It’s not just about defending individual figures like Gaetz; it’s about challenging the ideological stranglehold that dominates much of the mainstream media.

The public deserves a media landscape where truth takes precedence over partisan alignment. Episodes like this one remind us why the fight for journalistic integrity is essential. Conservatives must continue to expose bias, demand accountability, and support alternative platforms that prioritize facts over narratives.

In a time where media institutions wield immense influence, ensuring that they adhere to the principles of honesty and fairness is a battle worth fighting. For those who value truth and transparency, Hostin’s reluctant retraction is both a validation of their concerns and a reminder of the work that lies ahead.