the Conservative TAKE
News • Politics • Culture
The Vance-Walz Debate Could Be the Most Influential VP Debate in U.S. History
October 01, 2024
post photo preview
Left: Republican vice presidential nominee Sen. J.D. Vance speaks at a campaign rally on August 6 in Philadelphia. Right: Democratic vice presidential nominee Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz addresses the Democratic National Convention on August 21 in Chicago. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images; Drew Hallowell/Getty Images

As we head into one of the most critical elections in modern U.S. history, the vice-presidential debate between J.D. Vance and Tim Walz has the potential to be the most influential VP debate ever. With Vice President Kamala Harris dodging detailed policy discussions and offering little more than vague soundbites throughout the campaign, this debate will be the first opportunity for voters to hear substantial policy discourse—something that has been sorely missing from the Harris/Walz ticket. Here’s why this debate could eclipse previous VP matchups and alter the trajectory of the race.

1. Kamala Harris: The Queen of Word Salad

Vice President Kamala Harris has become synonymous with vague, meandering answers that often leave the public and media searching for any coherent policy stance. Whether in interviews or public appearances, Harris tends to lean on her background, reciting personal anecdotes about growing up in a middle-class neighborhood or her work as a prosecutor. However, she has consistently avoided specifics on pressing issues, from immigration to the economy. Critics, like Peggy Noonan from The Wall Street Journal, have pointed out that Harris’s inability to deliver clear, direct answers reflects poorly on her ability to lead.

Voters are hungry for real answers. Harris has yet to hold a formal press conference during this campaign, avoiding direct engagement on policy. Meanwhile, her running mate, Tim Walz, has mirrored this strategy, offering little more than progressive platitudes without diving into the details of his platform. The American people have grown tired of the “word salad” responses from the Harris/Walz camp, and this debate will finally offer the stark contrast voters are seeking.

2. J.D. Vance: A Voice for the Working Class with Substance

While the Harris/Walz campaign has relied on vague talking points, J.D. Vance offers something different—clarity and substance. Vance has been dismissed by Democrats as “weird,” but his appeal to the working-class voter is undeniable. Raised in the heart of Ohio, Vance understands the economic struggles of middle America, and he speaks to these issues with authenticity. Unlike the Democratic ticket, which avoids direct policy discussions, Vance is a policy wonk with a deep understanding of complex issues that matter to voters, from economic revitalization to trade and manufacturing.

This debate is Vance’s opportunity to showcase his command of policy and, in doing so, expose Tim Walz as a politician disconnected from the Rust Belt’s reality. Walz, who allowed his state to spiral into chaos during the riots of 2020, will have to answer for his failures in leadership—a stark contrast to Vance’s promise to restore order and economic stability in struggling regions. Vance’s ability to communicate real policy while connecting with working-class voters is what sets him apart in this debate and could be the deciding factor for millions of Americans.

3. Tim Walz: Rust Belt Fraud or Progressive Puppet?

Tim Walz will face significant challenges in this debate, as his record as governor of Minnesota will come under intense scrutiny. During the summer of 2020, Minneapolis became a focal point of the nationwide protests and riots following the death of George Floyd. Walz was heavily criticized for his mishandling of the situation, as the state suffered massive property damage, and many Minnesotans felt abandoned by his lack of decisive action. This debate gives Vance the chance to highlight Walz’s failures, showing that his leadership during the crisis was weak and ineffective.

In addition, Walz’s support for far-left policies—like tampons in boys’ bathrooms and other progressive cultural issues—will alienate moderate voters, especially those in swing states like Ohio and Pennsylvania. These policies may align with the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, but they do little to address the concerns of everyday Americans in the Rust Belt who care more about jobs, safety, and economic opportunity. Vance will likely draw a sharp contrast between Walz’s out-of-touch progressive positions and his own focus on economic growth and rebuilding American industry.

4. J.D. Vance’s Strength: Mastery of Policy vs. Walz’s Vagueness

One of the defining features of this debate will be the stark difference in how the candidates handle policy discussions. J.D. Vance is a master of policy minutiae. While President Trump—known for his bold, sweeping rhetoric—does not often dive into the weeds of policy, Vance excels in this area. Trump, having already served four years in office, doesn’t need to get into the fine details because his record speaks for itself—he was vetted by his performance as president, during which the country experienced historic economic growth, energy independence, and stronger border security.

Vance fills the gap by offering voters the detailed policy arguments that Trump doesn’t always emphasize. Vance’s expertise on issues like manufacturing, trade, and working-class economics will stand in stark contrast to the Harris/Walz ticket, which has so far been all slogans and no substance. This debate will force Walz to engage on real issues—something the Democratic campaign has been avoiding for months. As voters become increasingly frustrated with the lack of specific answers from Harris and Walz, Vance’s command of policy will be a breath of fresh air.

Additionally, Vance can effectively counter the false narrative that MAGA’s future agenda is driven by Project 2025, a think tank plan attributed to the Heritage Foundation. In reality, Vance will likely emphasize the real vision of MAGA: Agenda 47, a platform focused on economic revitalization, energy independence, and restoring American greatness. By clearly articulating the policies behind Agenda 47, Vance can dispel misconceptions and offer a compelling alternative to Walz’s vague progressive talking points.

5. The Debate America Has Been Waiting For

The American people are desperate for substance. In an election where much of the public discourse has been dominated by rhetorical dodges and talking-point politics, this debate offers something different. J.D. Vance will bring clarity, detail, and a focus on real issues that have been missing from the campaign thus far. For the first time, voters will hear from a candidate who can not only connect with the working-class electorate but also explain, in detail, how his policies will improve their lives.

This is a critical moment for the Republican ticket, as Vance’s clear command of policy will stand in stark contrast to the vague and often contradictory positions of Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. Where the Democrats have been offering word salads and avoiding press conferences, Vance will deliver concrete solutions to the problems facing America. This debate could be the moment where the Republican ticket begins to decisively pull ahead, showing the American people that there is a real alternative to the vague promises and empty rhetoric that have characterized the Harris/Walz campaign.

This VP debate has the potential to be the most influential in U.S. history. J.D. Vance will have the opportunity to showcase his policy expertise and connect with the working-class voters who feel neglected by the progressive agenda. Meanwhile, Tim Walz will be forced to defend his record and provide real answers—something his campaign has avoided up to this point. This debate will finally give voters what they’ve been waiting for: a substantive conversation about the future of America.

community logo
Join the the Conservative TAKE Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
00:01:20
Biblical Citizenship in Modern America Commentary Ep14 - Understanding the Times 3

00:00 Introduction
02:03 Week 13 review
04:56 Our Current Education System
05:59 Six Verbs for Advancing Truth in the Country
09:08 What Our Elected Officials Don't Know About America
10:44 The Foundation of Law
12:12 Who Were the Signers of the Declaration of Independence?
13:52 Benjamin Rush
15:44 What is Patriotism?
18:34 Summary of Workbook

00:25:36
FREE TO ALL MEMBERS - Biblical Citizenship in Modern America Commentary Ep01 - The Foundation

CHAPTERS
00:00 Introduction
02:43 Outline
05:14 The Great Commission
10:03 Workbook
29:40 The Monument of the Forefathers Introduction
30:54 Wrap Up

💌 Join our YT channel to get access to perks:
http://JOIN.theConservativeTAKE.com/

🚫Want UNCENSORED content? Join us on Locals.
http://locals.theConservativeTAKE.com/

📢the Conservative Take Channel
https://youtube.com/theConservativeTAKE

🌟DISCORD
http://discord.theConservativeTAKE.com


🔗LINKS:

http://discord.theConservativeTAKE.com


📖 Real Help
The Gospel in 4 Minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ty6jU3PFCds

The Holy Bible
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiXQmeuHTOY&list=PLblm4cSmwa-ufOiEYfLkO1sJv3IyrFOIQ

URL Source links can be found on our discord server (📒video-resources channel) or join or via signing up as a member on our website, links below. Both are free to sign-up. ...

00:33:06
Why This so-called “economic blackout” is DUMB - 6 Reasons

This so-called “economic blackout” is completely pointless for several reasons:

1️⃣ People Will Just Spend on Thursday or Saturday – A one-day boycott doesn’t actually hurt businesses in the long run. If someone needs gas, food, or groceries, they’ll just buy it the day before or after. This means total revenue for the week won’t change much, if at all.

2️⃣ Conservatives Will Overspend to Counter It – The majority of Americans lean conservative, and they oppose these leftist protest stunts. Instead of hurting big businesses, this boycott will likely backfire, as conservatives will deliberately spend MORE to neutralize the impact.

3️⃣ Big Businesses Won’t Care – Large corporations operate on long-term revenue trends, not single-day sales. A minor dip in transactions over 24 hours means nothing compared to quarterly profits. They’ll recoup any losses within days.

4️⃣ It Won’t "Shake Things Up" – The idea that this will somehow force corporations to ...

Is Zelensky Acting Like a Dictator?

President Zelensky has suspended elections, banned opposition parties, and cracked down on religious groups. President Trump has labeled him a "dictator without elections." Is Zelensky defending Ukraine or consolidating power? Let's take a closer look.

Suspension of Elections – Zelensky canceled Ukraine’s 2024 elections, citing martial law. While Ukraine is at war, democratic countries (like the U.S. during the Civil War or the UK in WWII) have still held elections. His refusal to allow them raises concerns about democracy.

Crackdown on Opposition – Zelensky banned multiple political parties (including the Opposition Platform – For Life, the second-largest party in parliament) and seized control of TV networks to consolidate power.

Persecution of Religious Leaders – The Ukrainian government has arrested clergy of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, accusing them of being pro-Russian, which critics say is an attack on religious freedom.

Western Money Misuse – Reports suggest that ...

The Kyle Suggs Show Livestream: The 2nd Inauguration of 47th President Trump
placeholder
post photo preview
Transparency Isn’t Pretty: The Truth About the Early Pam Bondi-Epstein Fallout
UPDATED - 2/28/25 11:23am EST

This is what transparency looks like. We said we wanted it, and now we have it. The upside? We get real-time updates instead of secrecy. The downside? We enter a fog of war, where narratives shift, unpredictable things happen, and mistakes and bad optics are inevitable. Case in point: influencers leaving the White House, all smiles, carrying binders. Given the sheer number of victims and the horrific nature of the crimes, it was an awful look. But this is what transparency means; we are seeing the process unfold in real time, flaws and all. You can’t have it both ways.

Social media influencers leaving the White House, all smiles, carrying binders.

Under Biden, we got nothing. If Kamala had won, Epstein wouldn’t even be a topic of discussion. Now, for the first time, there’s movement, and yet, instead of focusing on the bigger picture, people are obsessing over optics. That’s shortsighted. We need to judge this by actual results. Draining the swamp isn’t for the weak; it’s an ugly, drawn-out process, and those who expect it to be clean and flawless are setting themselves up for disappointment.

The Debrief article - Photo Credit: White House

If you really think about it, the only reason some people are upset is that this administration is being transparent. That transparency, however, comes with growing pains. Accountability is necessary, yes, but it must be done properly. We understand the frustration, but overreacting only plays into the hands of those who want to keep information hidden. The Deep State isn’t going to roll over; they will fight back, sabotage the process, and manipulate the narrative to make transparency itself look like a mistake. The goal is to smoke the rats out, and if we lose focus or react emotionally, we risk delaying and weakening that effort. This fight is much bigger than one press conference or one bad photo-op. What matters is real results, not distractions.

Attorney General Pam Bondi has accused the FBI's New York field office of withholding "thousands of pages" of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. Despite prior assurances that all pertinent files had been provided, Bondi was recently informed of the existence of additional undisclosed materials. In response, she has demanded that FBI Director Kash Patel ensure the complete set of Epstein files including all records, documents, audio and video recordings, and related materials be delivered to her office by 8:00 a.m. on February 28, 2025. Bondi has also directed Patel to conduct an immediate investigation into the FBI's failure to comply with her initial order, requiring a comprehensive report of findings and proposed personnel actions within 14 days. Director Patel has pledged full cooperation, stating, "There will be no cover-ups, no missing documents, and no stone left unturned."


This blatant obstruction by the FBI is exactly why draining the swamp is such an uphill battle. Corrupt institutions don’t just comply—they resist, delay, and cover their tracks. It takes time to root out bad actors and regain control as Elon Musk put it perfectly:

"Imagine if you were suddenly appointed AG or head of the FBI. You were just thrown on a ship with a hostile crew. Until you appoint some new crew members and figure out the ropes, you can’t steer the ship effectively. It’s literally impossible."

The swamp isn’t just a modern problem; it has been embedded in American politics for nearly two centuries. Martin Van Buren perfected the spoils system, where political loyalty mattered more than competence, laying the foundation for the bureaucratic machine we now call the Deep State. Over time, that system grew more powerful, more unaccountable, and more resistant to reform; it became a self-preserving monster, designed to protect itself at all costs.

Today’s Deep State is the culmination of generations of backroom deals, institutional rot, and entrenched elites who believe they are above the law. This was never going to be an easy fight, and anyone who expected a clean, mistake-free process was never serious about what this battle actually requires.

A proper understanding of history and perspective is crucial. Draining the swamp isn’t just about a few firings or high-profile arrests; it’s about dismantling a system that has survived, adapted, and thrived since the 1800s. This isn’t a sprint; it’s a war, and wars are messy.

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Media Is Lying: 2025 Is the Safest Year for Aviation in Decades

In an era where the media selectively amplifies certain narratives, it’s easy to overlook real, measurable improvements in public safety. One such overlooked fact is that the U.S. has experienced a dramatic improvement in aviation safety in early 2025, making it the safest start to a year in at least two decades.

Caption

The Numbers Don't Lie

A simple query on the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) database confirms this:

  • January 2024: 80 aviation accidents
  • February 2024: 93 aviation accidents
  • January 2025: 62 aviation accidents
  • February 2025 (as of 2/23/25): 37 aviation accidents

    The NTSB aviation accident database contains civil aviation accidents and selected incidents that occurred from 1962 to present within the United States, its territories and possessions, and in international waters. 

That means aviation accidents in January and February 2025 have been cut by more than half compared to the same period in 2024—a drastic and undeniable improvement.

Looking at the broader picture, in 2024, the U.S. saw over 1,800 crashes, accidents, and near-miss incidents, leading to 317 fatalities. Yet, if we isolate January 2024 and January 2025, it’s clear that 2025 has seen a significant decline in total aviation incidents.

This isn’t just an improvement over last year—it’s the lowest monthly accident rate in the last 20 years.

Why Aren't We Talking About This?

With such a remarkable improvement in safety, you might expect widespread coverage of this positive trend. Instead, mainstream media outlets have largely ignored these statistics. Why? Because good news doesn’t generate fear, controversy, or clicks. Instead, the media focuses on isolated incidents, distorting public perception and making aviation seem more dangerous than ever—when, in fact, the opposite is true.

The reality is clear: Americans flying in 2025 are safer than they’ve been in decades. Whether due to advancements in technology, improved safety regulations, or more effective oversight, the numbers speak for themselves.

Aviation in 2025: Safer Than Ever

The data proves it: air travel in the U.S. is safer in 2025 than it was at this time in 2024, and likely safer than at any point in the last 20 years. Unfortunately, this isn’t a headline you’ll see on the evening news. But for those paying attention, it's a reminder that despite the noise and distraction, real progress is happening—whether the media acknowledges it or not.

placeholder

Read full Article
the Conservative TAKE Position Statement: The Hard Truth About Reform and Responsibility

At the Conservative TAKE, we believe in confronting uncomfortable truths. The recent actions by Elon Musk at X (formerly Twitter) and the reforms championed by President Trump are necessary responses to decades of fiscal irresponsibility and systemic corruption. While it's distressing to witness job losses, these challenges should have been addressed half a century ago. Instead, politicians from both parties deferred action, enriching themselves at the nation's expense.

Our national debt now exceeds $34 trillion, with an annual deficit of approximately $1.7 trillion. Continuing on this trajectory risks economic collapse within the next decade, jeopardizing the value of the U.S. dollar and imperiling retirement savings like 401(k)s and Social Security. Alarmingly, members of Congress earn a salary of $174,000, yet many amass fortunes worth tens of millions during their tenure, raising serious ethical concerns.

It's easy to direct frustration toward figures like Trump or Musk, but consider the following:

  1. Reform is imperative—Ignoring the problem only exacerbates it.
  2. Trump campaigned on addressing these issues—His 2024 victory over Kamala Harris, with a popular vote margin of over 2 million votes, reflects a mandate for change.
  3. Both parties have pledged reform for decades—Yet systemic issues persist, and self-enrichment continues unabated.
  4. Proactive measures now will mitigate future hardships—Delaying action will only lead to more severe consequences.

Federal employees are understandably affected during this transition. It's important to recognize that upon their hiring, they take an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Transitioning from expansive government roles to the private sector can enhance our economy through increased efficiency and productivity driven by market incentives.

The root cause of our current predicament lies in over 70 years of inadequate leadership. We must hold accountable those who promised reform but failed to deliver. The American populace deserves a government that serves its citizens, not one that exploits taxpayer resources for personal gain.

The path to recovery is challenging, but it's essential to rectify past missteps to secure our nation's future. The era of excuses has ended.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals