the Conservative TAKE
News • Politics • Culture
Why the Washington Times Misleads on Trump’s Order Restoring Presidential Authority
UPDATED - 2/19/25 5:45pm EST
February 19, 2025
post photo preview

Why the Washington Times Article is Misleading

The Washington Times article presents President Trump’s executive order as a radical change, implying that it unduly concentrates power in the hands of the president and attorney general while weakening federal agencies. However, this characterization is misleading because the executive order simply restores the constitutional structure of the executive branch as intended by the Founders and reaffirmed in Supreme Court precedent.

The executive order does not eliminate regulatory agencies or prevent them from enforcing laws. Instead, it reaffirms that these agencies, which exist within the executive branch, must be accountable to the president—not function as independent entities outside presidential oversight. This aligns with the original intent of the Constitution, which vests all executive power in the president under Article II, Section 1. The Washington Times article fails to emphasize this point, instead suggesting that independent agencies have a constitutional right to operate without presidential control, which is not the case.

This title was changed but still shows up in search as this misleading and dishonest title.
Title as seen from Freespoke search as of 2/19/25 5:34pm EST



Why the Executive Order is Constitutional

  1. Article II’s Vesting Clause

    • The Constitution explicitly states that "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America."
    • This means that all executive branch officials, including regulatory agencies, exercise power only as delegated by the president. They do not have independent constitutional authority.
  2. The Take Care Clause

    • Article II, Section 3 requires the president to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed."
    • If agencies are making legal interpretations contrary to the president's direction, that violates the structure of the executive branch. The president has the constitutional duty to ensure a unified and coherent execution of federal law.
  3. The Myth of "Independent" Agencies

    • Agencies like the FTC, FCC, and SEC have often been referred to as "independent," but this status is a legislative construct, not a constitutional one.
    • While Congress can create agencies and limit the president’s power to remove certain officials (Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, 1935), it cannot strip away the president’s core executive power to supervise and direct agency action.
  4. Precedent Supports Presidential Control Over Executive Agencies

    • In Myers v. United States (1926), the Supreme Court held that the president has the constitutional authority to remove executive officials, reinforcing the idea that these officials act under his direction.
    • More recently, Seila Law v. CFPB (2020) reaffirmed that agencies exercising executive power must remain accountable to the president.

How This Order Restores Constitutional Governance

  • The order simply clarifies that executive agencies cannot adopt conflicting interpretations of the law without presidential approval.
  • It requires agencies to submit regulations for White House review, ensuring democratic accountability and preventing bureaucratic overreach.
  • It restores the principle that agencies do not function as a "fourth branch of government" but are part of the executive branch, under presidential supervision.

In the end...

The Washington Times article mischaracterizes President Trump’s executive order as an unprecedented centralization of power when, in reality, it restores the constitutional structure of the executive branch as the Founders intended. Article II vests all executive power in the president, meaning that federal agencies—including so-called independent regulatory bodies—operate under his authority. The order does not abolish these agencies or prevent them from enforcing laws; it simply ensures they remain accountable to the elected president rather than functioning as an unaccountable fourth branch of government.

This executive order is entirely constitutional and rooted in the Founders’ vision. The Take Care Clause obligates the president to ensure laws are faithfully executed, which cannot happen if agencies adopt conflicting legal interpretations without presidential oversight. Supreme Court precedent—from Myers v. United States (1926) to Seila Law v. CFPB (2020)—has consistently affirmed that regulatory agencies exercising executive power must remain under presidential supervision. While Congress can limit removals in some cases, it cannot strip the president of his constitutional authority over the executive branch.

Far from a power grab, this order corrects decades of bureaucratic overreach that allowed unelected officials to impose costly and controversial regulations without democratic accountability. By requiring agencies to submit proposed rules for White House review, the order ensures that executive actions reflect the will of the people through their elected leader. The Washington Times’ framing is misleading—this is not an expansion of presidential power, but a long-overdue restoration of constitutional governance.


Here are sources that support the constitutionality of President Trump’s executive order and the principle of presidential oversight of federal agencies:

Constitutional Text:

  1. Article II, Section 1 – Vests all executive power in the President.
    • U.S. Constitution: "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America."
  2. Article II, Section 3 (Take Care Clause) – Requires the President to ensure laws are faithfully executed.

Supreme Court Precedents:

  1. Myers v. United States (1926) – Ruled that the President has the exclusive power to remove executive officers, affirming executive control over the bureaucracy.
  2. Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935) – Allowed Congress to limit presidential removal power in quasi-legislative/quasi-judicial agencies, but did not strip the president of general executive oversight.
  3. Seila Law LLC v. CFPB (2020) – Reaffirmed that executive agencies must be accountable to the President, striking down restrictions on the President’s ability to remove the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

Legal Scholarship & Analysis:

  1. Federalist No. 70 (Alexander Hamilton) – Argues for a unitary executive, where the President is singularly responsible for the executive branch’s actions.
  2. The Heritage Guide to the Constitution – Provides historical and legal analysis on the President’s executive power and oversight of agencies.
  3. Cato Institute Analysis – Discusses the constitutional limits of independent agencies and the need for executive accountability.

White House Executive Order & Fact Sheet:

  1. Trump’s 2025 Executive Order on Independent Agencies – Full text of the order.
    • White House Website: (Currently unavailable—check archived versions or official government sites).
  2. White House Fact Sheet on the Executive Order – Summarizes the purpose and justification for the order.
community logo
Join the the Conservative TAKE Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
00:01:20
Biblical Citizenship in Modern America Commentary Ep14 - Understanding the Times 3

00:00 Introduction
02:03 Week 13 review
04:56 Our Current Education System
05:59 Six Verbs for Advancing Truth in the Country
09:08 What Our Elected Officials Don't Know About America
10:44 The Foundation of Law
12:12 Who Were the Signers of the Declaration of Independence?
13:52 Benjamin Rush
15:44 What is Patriotism?
18:34 Summary of Workbook

00:25:36
FREE TO ALL MEMBERS - Biblical Citizenship in Modern America Commentary Ep01 - The Foundation

CHAPTERS
00:00 Introduction
02:43 Outline
05:14 The Great Commission
10:03 Workbook
29:40 The Monument of the Forefathers Introduction
30:54 Wrap Up

💌 Join our YT channel to get access to perks:
http://JOIN.theConservativeTAKE.com/

🚫Want UNCENSORED content? Join us on Locals.
http://locals.theConservativeTAKE.com/

📢the Conservative Take Channel
https://youtube.com/theConservativeTAKE

🌟DISCORD
http://discord.theConservativeTAKE.com


🔗LINKS:

http://discord.theConservativeTAKE.com


📖 Real Help
The Gospel in 4 Minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ty6jU3PFCds

The Holy Bible
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiXQmeuHTOY&list=PLblm4cSmwa-ufOiEYfLkO1sJv3IyrFOIQ

URL Source links can be found on our discord server (📒video-resources channel) or join or via signing up as a member on our website, links below. Both are free to sign-up. ...

00:33:06
Why This so-called “economic blackout” is DUMB - 6 Reasons

This so-called “economic blackout” is completely pointless for several reasons:

1️⃣ People Will Just Spend on Thursday or Saturday – A one-day boycott doesn’t actually hurt businesses in the long run. If someone needs gas, food, or groceries, they’ll just buy it the day before or after. This means total revenue for the week won’t change much, if at all.

2️⃣ Conservatives Will Overspend to Counter It – The majority of Americans lean conservative, and they oppose these leftist protest stunts. Instead of hurting big businesses, this boycott will likely backfire, as conservatives will deliberately spend MORE to neutralize the impact.

3️⃣ Big Businesses Won’t Care – Large corporations operate on long-term revenue trends, not single-day sales. A minor dip in transactions over 24 hours means nothing compared to quarterly profits. They’ll recoup any losses within days.

4️⃣ It Won’t "Shake Things Up" – The idea that this will somehow force corporations to ...

Is Zelensky Acting Like a Dictator?

President Zelensky has suspended elections, banned opposition parties, and cracked down on religious groups. President Trump has labeled him a "dictator without elections." Is Zelensky defending Ukraine or consolidating power? Let's take a closer look.

Suspension of Elections – Zelensky canceled Ukraine’s 2024 elections, citing martial law. While Ukraine is at war, democratic countries (like the U.S. during the Civil War or the UK in WWII) have still held elections. His refusal to allow them raises concerns about democracy.

Crackdown on Opposition – Zelensky banned multiple political parties (including the Opposition Platform – For Life, the second-largest party in parliament) and seized control of TV networks to consolidate power.

Persecution of Religious Leaders – The Ukrainian government has arrested clergy of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, accusing them of being pro-Russian, which critics say is an attack on religious freedom.

Western Money Misuse – Reports suggest that ...

The Kyle Suggs Show Livestream: The 2nd Inauguration of 47th President Trump
placeholder
post photo preview
Transparency Isn’t Pretty: The Truth About the Early Pam Bondi-Epstein Fallout
UPDATED - 2/28/25 11:23am EST

This is what transparency looks like. We said we wanted it, and now we have it. The upside? We get real-time updates instead of secrecy. The downside? We enter a fog of war, where narratives shift, unpredictable things happen, and mistakes and bad optics are inevitable. Case in point: influencers leaving the White House, all smiles, carrying binders. Given the sheer number of victims and the horrific nature of the crimes, it was an awful look. But this is what transparency means; we are seeing the process unfold in real time, flaws and all. You can’t have it both ways.

Social media influencers leaving the White House, all smiles, carrying binders.

Under Biden, we got nothing. If Kamala had won, Epstein wouldn’t even be a topic of discussion. Now, for the first time, there’s movement, and yet, instead of focusing on the bigger picture, people are obsessing over optics. That’s shortsighted. We need to judge this by actual results. Draining the swamp isn’t for the weak; it’s an ugly, drawn-out process, and those who expect it to be clean and flawless are setting themselves up for disappointment.

The Debrief article - Photo Credit: White House

If you really think about it, the only reason some people are upset is that this administration is being transparent. That transparency, however, comes with growing pains. Accountability is necessary, yes, but it must be done properly. We understand the frustration, but overreacting only plays into the hands of those who want to keep information hidden. The Deep State isn’t going to roll over; they will fight back, sabotage the process, and manipulate the narrative to make transparency itself look like a mistake. The goal is to smoke the rats out, and if we lose focus or react emotionally, we risk delaying and weakening that effort. This fight is much bigger than one press conference or one bad photo-op. What matters is real results, not distractions.

Attorney General Pam Bondi has accused the FBI's New York field office of withholding "thousands of pages" of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. Despite prior assurances that all pertinent files had been provided, Bondi was recently informed of the existence of additional undisclosed materials. In response, she has demanded that FBI Director Kash Patel ensure the complete set of Epstein files including all records, documents, audio and video recordings, and related materials be delivered to her office by 8:00 a.m. on February 28, 2025. Bondi has also directed Patel to conduct an immediate investigation into the FBI's failure to comply with her initial order, requiring a comprehensive report of findings and proposed personnel actions within 14 days. Director Patel has pledged full cooperation, stating, "There will be no cover-ups, no missing documents, and no stone left unturned."


This blatant obstruction by the FBI is exactly why draining the swamp is such an uphill battle. Corrupt institutions don’t just comply—they resist, delay, and cover their tracks. It takes time to root out bad actors and regain control as Elon Musk put it perfectly:

"Imagine if you were suddenly appointed AG or head of the FBI. You were just thrown on a ship with a hostile crew. Until you appoint some new crew members and figure out the ropes, you can’t steer the ship effectively. It’s literally impossible."

The swamp isn’t just a modern problem; it has been embedded in American politics for nearly two centuries. Martin Van Buren perfected the spoils system, where political loyalty mattered more than competence, laying the foundation for the bureaucratic machine we now call the Deep State. Over time, that system grew more powerful, more unaccountable, and more resistant to reform; it became a self-preserving monster, designed to protect itself at all costs.

Today’s Deep State is the culmination of generations of backroom deals, institutional rot, and entrenched elites who believe they are above the law. This was never going to be an easy fight, and anyone who expected a clean, mistake-free process was never serious about what this battle actually requires.

A proper understanding of history and perspective is crucial. Draining the swamp isn’t just about a few firings or high-profile arrests; it’s about dismantling a system that has survived, adapted, and thrived since the 1800s. This isn’t a sprint; it’s a war, and wars are messy.

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Media Is Lying: 2025 Is the Safest Year for Aviation in Decades

In an era where the media selectively amplifies certain narratives, it’s easy to overlook real, measurable improvements in public safety. One such overlooked fact is that the U.S. has experienced a dramatic improvement in aviation safety in early 2025, making it the safest start to a year in at least two decades.

Caption

The Numbers Don't Lie

A simple query on the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) database confirms this:

  • January 2024: 80 aviation accidents
  • February 2024: 93 aviation accidents
  • January 2025: 62 aviation accidents
  • February 2025 (as of 2/23/25): 37 aviation accidents

    The NTSB aviation accident database contains civil aviation accidents and selected incidents that occurred from 1962 to present within the United States, its territories and possessions, and in international waters. 

That means aviation accidents in January and February 2025 have been cut by more than half compared to the same period in 2024—a drastic and undeniable improvement.

Looking at the broader picture, in 2024, the U.S. saw over 1,800 crashes, accidents, and near-miss incidents, leading to 317 fatalities. Yet, if we isolate January 2024 and January 2025, it’s clear that 2025 has seen a significant decline in total aviation incidents.

This isn’t just an improvement over last year—it’s the lowest monthly accident rate in the last 20 years.

Why Aren't We Talking About This?

With such a remarkable improvement in safety, you might expect widespread coverage of this positive trend. Instead, mainstream media outlets have largely ignored these statistics. Why? Because good news doesn’t generate fear, controversy, or clicks. Instead, the media focuses on isolated incidents, distorting public perception and making aviation seem more dangerous than ever—when, in fact, the opposite is true.

The reality is clear: Americans flying in 2025 are safer than they’ve been in decades. Whether due to advancements in technology, improved safety regulations, or more effective oversight, the numbers speak for themselves.

Aviation in 2025: Safer Than Ever

The data proves it: air travel in the U.S. is safer in 2025 than it was at this time in 2024, and likely safer than at any point in the last 20 years. Unfortunately, this isn’t a headline you’ll see on the evening news. But for those paying attention, it's a reminder that despite the noise and distraction, real progress is happening—whether the media acknowledges it or not.

placeholder

Read full Article
the Conservative TAKE Position Statement: The Hard Truth About Reform and Responsibility

At the Conservative TAKE, we believe in confronting uncomfortable truths. The recent actions by Elon Musk at X (formerly Twitter) and the reforms championed by President Trump are necessary responses to decades of fiscal irresponsibility and systemic corruption. While it's distressing to witness job losses, these challenges should have been addressed half a century ago. Instead, politicians from both parties deferred action, enriching themselves at the nation's expense.

Our national debt now exceeds $34 trillion, with an annual deficit of approximately $1.7 trillion. Continuing on this trajectory risks economic collapse within the next decade, jeopardizing the value of the U.S. dollar and imperiling retirement savings like 401(k)s and Social Security. Alarmingly, members of Congress earn a salary of $174,000, yet many amass fortunes worth tens of millions during their tenure, raising serious ethical concerns.

It's easy to direct frustration toward figures like Trump or Musk, but consider the following:

  1. Reform is imperative—Ignoring the problem only exacerbates it.
  2. Trump campaigned on addressing these issues—His 2024 victory over Kamala Harris, with a popular vote margin of over 2 million votes, reflects a mandate for change.
  3. Both parties have pledged reform for decades—Yet systemic issues persist, and self-enrichment continues unabated.
  4. Proactive measures now will mitigate future hardships—Delaying action will only lead to more severe consequences.

Federal employees are understandably affected during this transition. It's important to recognize that upon their hiring, they take an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Transitioning from expansive government roles to the private sector can enhance our economy through increased efficiency and productivity driven by market incentives.

The root cause of our current predicament lies in over 70 years of inadequate leadership. We must hold accountable those who promised reform but failed to deliver. The American populace deserves a government that serves its citizens, not one that exploits taxpayer resources for personal gain.

The path to recovery is challenging, but it's essential to rectify past missteps to secure our nation's future. The era of excuses has ended.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals