the Conservative TAKE
Politics • Culture • News
the Conservative TAKE is a #MAGA site/channel that gives a conservative take on pop culture & politics.

We do not take ourselves too seriously. We simply want to create great, creative content & to have fun doing it.

One of our core missions is to allow people to think critically by presenting information in a larger context. This includes TV/Movie/Sports reviews & reactions, history lessons, politics and pop culture.

"Destroying the w0kE Narrative"

John 14:6
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
America Strikes Back at China with a Shovel, Not a Sword

The United States just signed a minerals deal with Ukraine that could change the balance of power, not on the battlefield, but in the boardroom. While this agreement won’t send U.S. troops to defend Ukraine, it could help liberate America from a different kind of threat: dependence on China for critical minerals.

The Deal at a Glance

Ukraine, sitting on a treasure trove of resources: lithium, titanium, graphite, and rare earths, has agreed to share half the revenues from these state-owned minerals into a joint investment fund with the United States. In return, the U.S. gets priority access to these vital materials and a stake in rebuilding Ukraine’s economy.

No soldiers, no weapons, no NATO entanglements just a strategic economic alliance.

Why It Matters

Right now, the U.S. relies heavily on China for materials essential to our national defense and tech industries. That’s a vulnerability no serious country can afford. This deal helps us:

  • Break Beijing’s chokehold on rare earth supplies.
  • Reinforce American manufacturing in defense, energy, and electronics.
  • Support a sovereign ally** without expanding our military footprint.

It’s a win-win for liberty-minded Americans who want strong borders and strong supply chains.

What It Doesn’t Do

Let’s be clear: this isn’t a military pact. There are no U.S. troops heading to Ukraine, and this deal doesn’t promise any security guarantees. Ukraine still stands alone against Russia, at least militarily.

But that’s part of what makes this deal smart. It respects American restraint, avoids foreign entanglements, and strengthens our position against both Russia and China...without firing a shot.

In the end...

This is how you build national resilience: through smart, sovereign, strategic alliances. Ukraine gets rebuilding capital. America gets resource independence. And we don’t have to sacrifice American lives or values to do it.

If you care about liberty, energy independence, and getting out from under China’s thumb, this is a deal worth watching.

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Odds of Love: A Probability Study Proving Jasmine Crockett’s Race Baiting Ignores the Real Challenges of Finding a Conservative Black Match

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Representative Jasmine Crockett’s recent criticism of Representative Byron Donalds for marrying a white woman highlights a regressive mindset steeped in ignorance and racial bias, casting doubt on her ability to engage with the diverse realities of American life.

https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1906302926571618409

By implying that Donalds has been “whitewashed” through his interracial marriage, Crockett clings to outdated stereotypes that dictate racial loyalty over personal agency, exposing her own hypocrisy in advocating for equality while policing others’ private choices. This narrow perspective stands in stark contrast to the evolving dynamics of relationships across racial lines, as evidenced by a probabilistic analysis of partner selection among conservative Black individuals. To illustrate the complexity of such dynamics, consider the following study estimating the likelihood of a conservative Black man finding and marrying a conservative Black woman who aligns with his values—a scenario Crockett might deem more “acceptable,” yet one fraught with its own...

00:00:46
00:01:20
Biblical Citizenship in Modern America Commentary Ep14 - Understanding the Times 3

00:00 Introduction
02:03 Week 13 review
04:56 Our Current Education System
05:59 Six Verbs for Advancing Truth in the Country
09:08 What Our Elected Officials Don't Know About America
10:44 The Foundation of Law
12:12 Who Were the Signers of the Declaration of Independence?
13:52 Benjamin Rush
15:44 What is Patriotism?
18:34 Summary of Workbook

00:25:36

Elon Musk is an American hero at the level of Alexander Hamilton and the Marquis de Lafayette. Like Musk, both Hamilton and Lafayette were not born American; Hamilton hailed from the Caribbean, and Lafayette from France. Yet, they gave their loyalty, brilliance, and youthful courage to the cause of American liberty. Each was closely aligned with the President: Hamilton with George Washington, Lafayette likewise forming a deep bond with him. Moreover both risked their lives to help secure America’s future. In our own time, Musk stands as a visionary force reshaping our nation's technological destiny, defending free speech, and advancing American exceptionalism with the same bold spirit.

Three Crucial SCOTUS Cases Could Restore the Founders’ Vision for Religious Liberty

Three pivotal religious liberty cases before the Supreme Court this month could redefine how faith-based rights are protected across education, charity, and parental authority in America.

Case 1 – Catholic Charity in Wisconsin: The first case addresses whether a Catholic social service organization in Wisconsin qualifies for a tax exemption under state law. The Wisconsin Supreme Court denied the exemption, claiming the charity’s services (though faith-motivated) were too secular to merit religious tax status. The Supreme Court's decision could significantly impact the ability of faith-based charities nationwide to operate without undue financial burdens.

Case 2 – Catholic Charter School in Oklahoma: The second case involves the constitutionality of a proposed Catholic charter school in Oklahoma. The state’s Supreme Court struck down the approval of the school, arguing that charter schools must remain secular as public institutions. This case challenges whether religious ...

post photo preview
Poker Analogy: Texas No-Limit Hold’em.

In a head-to-head match, the player with the biggest chip stack holds all the leverage. With enough chips, you can strong-arm your opponent, bully the pot, and force bad folds you win by pressure, not luck.

But if you get passive and let the short stack slowly claw back in, your mathematical leverage disappears. Suddenly, the chip lead means less, and you become vulnerable.

That’s where the U.S. is right now. We still lead the world—39% of global consumer spending, 25% of world GDP but that lead is shrinking.

Trump gets it. He’s forcing China to go all-in now, while America still holds the advantage. He’s using the chip lead when it counts—not waiting until the game is even.

Smart timing. Bold play. Maximum leverage. That’s how you win and Trump’s playing to win. 🇺🇸♠️💥

post photo preview
post photo preview
Why China Is Quietly Ending Tariffs and Folding in the Trade War

To start off...

In recent weeks, something big has been happening behind closed doors. China, once seen as a rising economic superpower, is quietly backing down in the trade war with the United States. While the Chinese Communist Party won’t admit it publicly, the signs are everywhere, tariffs are being dropped, American goods are being let in tariff-free, and secret early-morning meetings are being held with U.S. officials.

So what’s going on? Why is China caving? To understand it, we have to walk through China’s economic problems, the power of U.S. tariffs, and how President Trump has flipped the global economic system on its head.

1. The Trade War Begins – And Why It’s Not Equal

President Trump announced reciprocal tariffs in April 2025. 57 countries were hit, but China was the real target. The U.S. started with a 34% tariff on Chinese goods, which quickly rose to 145% across all sectors as China retaliated. But here’s the kicker: China sells five times more to the U.S. than we sell to them.

That makes China far more vulnerable. We’re the deficit country, meaning we import more, so China has more to lose. The math is simple: if tariffs stay, China loses up to 10 million jobs. Even if reduced, it could still lose 5 million jobs. That’s devastating.

2. China’s Debt Problem and the Evergrande Collapse

China isn’t just dealing with tariffs. It’s drowning in debt, especially from the real estate sector.

Evergrande, once the world’s biggest real estate developer, defaulted in 2021.

It owed billions, and when it crashed, it dragged down the entire property market.

Home prices have dropped 30% since 2021.

This caused local governments to lose money, developers to collapse, and banks to panic.

China’s economy has been weakened from the inside, and they can’t afford more pressure from the outside. The trade war is hitting them at their worst moment.

3. Raw Materials Dependence – The Ethane Example

China wants to be independent, but it still relies on U.S. raw materials.

Take ethane, a gas used in plastics. Chinese factories can’t make their own. Because of Trump’s tariffs, China slapped a 125% retaliatory tariff on U.S. ethane. But guess what happened?

Their plastics industry started to collapse. Without ethane, the factories shut down. Plastics are used in nearly everything from electronics to packaging. That shut down ripple effects across the economy.

So what did China do? They quietly removed the 125% tariff on U.S. ethane.

And that’s just the beginning.

4. Secret Tariff Removals Across Multiple Sectors

According to Reuters and Gatestone, China is dropping tariffs on:

  • Aviation parts
  • Industrial chemicals
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Semiconductors
  • Medical devices

Some American companies in China are even reporting that they are now importing tariff-free.

It’s not public. It’s quiet. But it’s real. China is folding and fast.

5. Xi Jinping Can’t Admit It Publicly

Xi Jinping and the Communist Party can’t look weak. Saving face is crucial in Chinese politics. That’s why all of this is happening in the shadows.

On April 24, 12 Chinese officials, including someone from their Finance Ministry, entered the U.S. Treasury building at 7 AM (before cameras could catch them).

Chinese security tried to block photos. But reports got out anyway.

These quiet talks are proof: China is coming to the table.

6. The Bigger Picture: Trump Is Rewriting the Global Economy

For decades, China grew rich inside the globalist trade system. Organizations like the WTO, IMF, and World Bank. They joined the WTO in 1971 and exploded economically.

But they never became “liberal” like the West hoped. Instead, they used the system to grow their own power.

Now, Trump is tearing that system down. He’s replacing it with economic nationalism where trade deals are bilateral (one-on-one) and based on America First.

This is called mercantilism, where trade is used for national security, not global cooperation.

Under this new system, if China wants to keep selling to America, it has to play by Trump’s rules.

7. Why China Can’t Win This War

Even though China is a major power (the second largest economy in the world), it’s still too dependent on exports, too burdened by debt, and too weak internally to fight a prolonged trade war.

Their economic growth is expected to drop by 2.4% due to these tariffs.

The globalist system they depended on is collapsing.

Trump’s America controls the playing field now.

So they’re doing the only thing they can: quietly giving in.

In the end...

China may act tough in public, but behind the scenes, they’re admitting reality. The trade war is hurting them more than us. Tariffs are being dropped, industries are being saved, and secret meetings are happening.

Trump’s strategy worked because it was based on leverage, facts, and free-market power not on globalist fantasies or Marxist-style central planning.

The world economy is changing fast. And like it or not, America is back in charge.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Trump’s Real Approval Ratings Crush MSM Lies

Over the past few weeks, corporate media outlets have rolled out a flood of negative polling headlines against Donald Trump — just in time for the 100-day milestone of his second term. According to the media narrative, Trump’s approval ratings are at historic lows, with outlets like ABC News, The Washington Post, and Reuters Ipsos all claiming that Americans are souring on his presidency. But when you dig into the actual polling data — especially daily-tracking polls like Rasmussen Reports — it becomes clear: the media is lying about Trump's numbers.

Mark Mitchell, Rasmussen’s head pollster, exposed this psychological operation ("psyop") in a recent interview and report. Rasmussen, the most accurate pollster over the last 20 years (beating out competitors in 2016, 2020, and 2024), continues to show Trump’s approval in a healthy, stable range, while media pollsters selectively release and manipulate data to fit their narrative.

Rasmussen Daily vs. Cherry-Picked Polls

Rasmussen polls daily — meaning they track public opinion every business day. This is crucial because daily data reveals trends in real-time, avoiding the massive gaps and selective "batch" releases the corporate media relies on.

For example:

  • Rasmussen's daily tracking showed Trump at 47% approval just last week, only -4 points underwater (47% approve / 51% disapprove). (Source: Rasmussen, April 2025)

  • Rasmussen also shows 42% right direction numbers for the country — 13 consecutive weeks of 42%+ — a metric closely tied to incumbent support.

Compare that to media polls:

  • ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos (April 2025): Claimed Trump at 39% approval, based on a small, skewed panel (Ipsos's proprietary left-leaning online panel).

  • Reuters/Ipsos (April 2025): Had Trump only -1 point underwater, much better than the narrative suggests — but barely publicized.

  • New York Times/Siena College: Claimed Trump was down -12 to -14 points — based on a tiny sample of only 900 respondents, not even close to Rasmussen's 40,000+ completed surveys.

Mark Mitchell noted: the worse the numbers for Trump, the closer they were released to the "100 days" news cycle. Before then, media outlets like Quinnipiac — which showed Trump at -11 — stayed suspiciously quiet.

Media Lies About Kamala Harris

The media tried floating a narrative that Kamala Harris was leading Trump. In reality, Rasmussen’s two-way matchup shows:

  • Trump 49%

  • Harris 44%
    (Source: Rasmussen, April 2025)

There has never been a reliable poll showing Kamala Harris consistently leading Trump across the general electorate. Ipsos/Reuters (September 2024) gave Kamala a fake +7 point lead, which even Mitchell called “laughable” given Rasmussen's consistent data showing Trump ahead.

Other polls Mitchell cited:

  • LA Times: Showed a one-point race (Trump essentially tied or leading).

  • Zogby: Trump +2 points against Harris.

  • Investor’s Business Daily/TIPP: Historically one of the few accurate 2016/2020 pollsters — closely mirrored Rasmussen, showing no Kamala advantage.

The Kamala lead narrative was manufactured, just like the recent “Trump collapse” narrative.

The Big Picture: Rasmussen Reality Check

Mitchell’s analysis shows the following:

  • Media pollsters flood the zone with bad numbers right before important news cycles (like the 100-day mark).

  • ABC/Washington Post used a sample that was overloaded with Democrats — with an absurd 93% disapproval among Democrats, something even real-world Democrat voters wouldn't reflect.

  • Independent voters were falsely shown as hating Trump by 50 points, when Rasmussen consistently shows Trump only about -10 among independents — completely within winning range.

On immigration — a key 2024 and 2025 issue — mainstream polls claim Trump is underwater. Yet Rasmussen shows overwhelming public support:

  • 50%+ of voters trust Republicans over Democrats on immigration.

  • Over 60% say there’s an invasion at the southern border caused by Democrats.

  • A majority backs Trump’s policies of deporting criminal illegal aliens immediately.

ABC News/Washington Post claimed Trump was underwater on immigration by 6 points — a blatant lie when cross-checked with real immigration issue polling.

The Search Data Proves It Too

Even Google search trends confirm Trump's relevance. Searches for “Trump approval” are historically higher than for any other president — Bush, Obama, Biden — combined. Voters still care about Trump’s performance, despite media attempts to brainwash them into thinking he's finished.

In the end...

Rasmussen's Mark Mitchell made it crystal clear: the media's narrative about Trump's collapsing support is a lie. Rasmussen’s real-time, daily numbers show a strong Trump approval holding steady — better than Obama’s second-term averages, and much better than Biden’s disastrous numbers.

The establishment media, pollsters, and Democrats are desperately trying to gaslight Americans into believing Trump is doomed. But the daily reality measured by Rasmussen tells a completely different story: Trump is stronger than ever, and the people are seeing through the lies.


Sources Referenced:

  • Rasmussen Reports (Mark Mitchell, April 2025)

  • ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos Poll (April 2025)

  • Reuters/Ipsos Poll (April 2025)

  • New York Times/Siena Poll (April 2025)

  • LA Times Poll

  • Zogby Poll

  • Investors Business Daily/TIPP

  • Google Trends (Trump Approval search data)

placeholder

Read full Article
post photo preview
Trump’s America First Economy: Beating China and Boosting Markets

White Paper Series Title: "Reviving America: A Supply-Side Blueprint for Economic Freedom"

Part 3:
Trump's America First Economic Strategy: A Supply-Side Analysis of Tariffs, Market Reactions, and Global Trade Realignment

Author: the Conservative TAKE contributor
Date: April 10, 2025
Prepared for: Advocates of Free Markets, Economic Nationalism, and American Sovereignty

 

Executive Summary

President Donald Trump's economic policies have been characterized by a bold commitment to America First principles, emphasizing fair trade, domestic industry revitalization, and strategic tariff implementations. On April 9, 2025, the financial markets responded emphatically to two pivotal developments:

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals