Sources

Justin Trudeau has just made a disastrous economic miscalculation. His announcement of a 25% tariff on $30 billion worth of U.S. goods, set to take effect on Tuesday, with another $125 billion in tariffs following in 21 days, is nothing short of economic suicide for Canada. If Trudeau believes he can strong-arm the United States, he is about to face a brutal reality check.

Starting February 1, 2025, Donald Trump has already imposed his own 25% tariffs on Canadian and Mexican imports, making it clear that his administration will prioritize American interests. If Trudeau chooses to escalate, he should expect Trump to double down—potentially imposing 50% tariffs that would devastate Canada’s already fragile economy.

Canada Needs the U.S. More Than the U.S. Needs Canada

The simple truth is this: Canada is far more dependent on the United States than vice versa. American businesses will find other trading partners, while Canadian industries—particularly in agriculture, manufacturing, and energy—will struggle to survive without access to the U.S. market. Trudeau’s virtue-signaling might score political points with his leftist base, but it won’t keep Canadian businesses afloat when their largest and most essential trading partner responds with crushing tariffs.

A full-blown trade war with the U.S. would be catastrophic for Canada. The nation is already struggling under Trudeau’s reckless economic policies, and this latest stunt could be the final straw that pushes the country into a severe recession.

Trump’s America First vs. Trudeau’s Weak Leadership

During his presidency, Donald Trump prioritized American prosperity, ensuring that so-called allies engaged in fair trade instead of leeching off U.S. economic strength. Under Trump’s leadership, America reasserted its dominance, forcing trade partners to play fair.

Trudeau, on the other hand, is recklessly gambling with Canada’s economic future. His delusional belief that he can take on the United States without severe consequences is the height of arrogance and incompetence. If he thinks this move will solidify his political standing, he is sorely mistaken.

Trump’s Tariffs Are a Necessary Response to Canada, Mexico, and China

Every single day, an average of 300 Americans are murdered by fentanyl—a deadly drug that originates in China, is funneled into Mexico and Canada, and then smuggled into the U.S. by Mexican cartels operating on both our southern and northern borders.

Yes, Mexican cartels are now operating in Canada, and neither the Canadian nor Mexican governments have done anything to stop the flow of human trafficking and drug smuggling into the U.S. Meanwhile, China continues to supply these cartels with the poison that is killing American citizens.

And this isn’t just about fentanyl. The horrifying effects of drug trafficking and human smuggling are eroding American society, burdening our communities, and forcing U.S. taxpayers to foot the bill for the crisis.

Shame on the governments of Canada, Mexico, and China for allowing this to happen.

The Economic Reality: The U.S. Holds the Power

While trade accounts for 67% of Canada’s GDP, 73% of Mexico’s GDP, and 37% of China’s GDP, it makes up only 24% of U.S. GDP. The U.S. economy is far less dependent on international trade than our so-called allies, and yet, in 2023, the U.S. trade deficit in goods was the largest in the world at over $1 trillion.

For decades, America has been taken advantage of by globalist policies that put foreign nations before our own people. But that era is over.

We Will Win This Trade War

America is tired of getting kicked in the teeth by weak leaders who refuse to stand up for our nation. President Trump is finally fighting back—and he’s using tariffs, a powerful and proven tool of economic leverage, to protect our national security and economic interests.

By imposing 25% tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China, Trump is making it clear that the days of America getting exploited by foreign nations are over. If Trudeau wants to play economic games, he will lose—because when push comes to shove, Canada needs the U.S. far more than the U.S. needs Canada.

Elon Musk recently tweeted about the U.S. federal deficit and how reducing it could help control inflation. Let’s break down what he said in simple terms so a 7th grader (or anyone!) can understand.

What Is the Federal Deficit?

The federal deficit is the amount of money the U.S. government spends beyond what it collects in taxes each year. Think of it like an allowance:

• If you earn $20 a week but spend $30, you are $10 short. That shortfall is your deficit.
• The government does this on a much bigger scale, often spending trillions more than it collects.

In his tweet, Musk says, "Reducing the federal deficit from $2T to $1T in FY2026 requires cutting an average of ~$4B/day in projected 2026 spending from now to Sept 30."

This means that right now, the U.S. is expected to spend $2 trillion more than it collects in 2026. If we want to cut that in half, we need to spend $4 billion less every single day until September 30, 2026.

What Is Inflation and Why Does It Matter?

Inflation is when prices for things like food, gas, and rent go up over time. It happens when too much money is chasing too few goods. Here’s an example:

• Imagine you and five friends all want the same rare Pokémon card at a store.
• The store only has one left, but you all have extra money.
• The store realizes this and raises the price, knowing someone will still buy it.

That’s how inflation works: when demand is high or when there’s too much money in the system, prices go up.

Musk is saying that if the government reduces its deficit, the economy might grow enough to keep inflation from rising in 2026.

Why Would a Smaller Deficit Help Inflation?

When the government spends more than it collects, it has to borrow money or print more money. This can make inflation worse.

Imagine a store has a limited number of PlayStation 5s in stock.

• Normally, the PS5 costs $500.
• But suddenly, everyone in town gets an extra $1,000 for free and rushes to buy one.
• Since demand is now sky-high and there aren’t enough PS5s for everyone, the store raises the price to $800 because they know people will still buy it.

That’s how inflation works: when too much money is in the system and supply stays the same, prices go up.

Musk is saying that if the government reduces its deficit, the economy might grow enough to keep inflation from rising in 2026.

"Super Big Deal."

Musk ends his tweet by saying, "That would still result in a ~$1T deficit, but economic growth should be able to match that number, which would mean no inflation in 2026. Super big deal."

• Even if we cut the deficit in half, the government would still be spending $1 trillion more than it takes in.
• But if the economy grows fast enough, that extra spending won’t cause inflation because businesses will be making more money, and people will have more jobs and higher wages.

This is a big deal because stable prices mean people don’t struggle to buy what they need. If inflation stays low, families can afford groceries, gas, and rent without feeling like their money is shrinking.

In the end...

Elon Musk is pointing out that the government spends too much money, which can make prices rise for everyone. By cutting the deficit, we could slow down inflation and keep prices stable. That would make life more affordable for everyday Americans.

His tweet may sound complicated, but at its core, it’s about making sure our money stays valuable and doesn’t lose purchasing power. If inflation is controlled, everyone benefits—and that’s a super big deal.

Since President Trump’s return to office, the media has been working overtime to stoke fear and hysteria over his administration’s common-sense policies. The latest target? The temporary pause on federal financial assistance programs, as outlined in the January 27, 2025, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) memorandum. Left-wing outlets and partisan activists have rushed to misrepresent this pause as an attack on the most vulnerable Americans. In reality, this is nothing more than a responsible and necessary step to get government spending under control and ensure taxpayer dollars are not wasted on radical, left-wing policies that have plagued federal agencies for years.

What the OMB Memo Actually Says

The OMB directive instructs federal agencies to temporarily pause financial assistance programs while reviewing them for alignment with President Trump’s policy priorities. The key phrase here is "review"—not "eliminate" or "defund." The memo specifically excludes programs that provide direct assistance to individuals, such as:

• Social Security
• Medicare
• Medicaid
• Food stamps (SNAP)
• Welfare benefits
• Other individual assistance programs

Furthermore, the memo explicitly states:
"Nothing in this memo should be construed to impact Medicare or Social Security benefits."
Yet, despite these clear exclusions, the media continues to push the false narrative that Trump's administration is trying to rip aid away from struggling Americans.

Media Misinformation and Manufactured Panic

During the January 29 White House press briefing, multiple reporters demonstrated exactly how the media distorts reality to serve a political agenda. Despite clear explanations from Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, reporters repeatedly asked the same misleading question about the funding pause, attempting to create an illusion of uncertainty.

Reporters Repeating the Same False Narrative

1. Zeke Miller (Associated Press):

   • "It’s caused a lot of confusion around the country among Head Start providers, services to homeless veterans, and Medicaid providers. Could you help clear up some confusion?"
   • Leavitt’s Response: "There’s no confusion in this building. This is not a blanket pause. Individual assistance programs, like Medicare, Social Security, and welfare benefits, are not affected."

2. Nancy Cordes (CBS News):

   • "How long is this pause going to last? And how should organizations relying on federal funding make payroll in the meantime?"
   • Leavitt’s Response: "It’s temporary. Agencies can request reviews, and exceptions will be granted on a case-by-case basis."

3. Peter Alexander (NBC News):

   • "Will nothing that the president is doing here, in terms of the freeze in these programs, raise prices for ordinary Americans?"
   • Leavitt’s Response: "This is about stopping reckless government spending, not taking away benefits. The real cause of price increases was Biden’s inflation crisis."

4. Jacqui Heinrich (Fox News):

   • "Does this impact organizations like Meals on Wheels?"
   • Leavitt’s Response: "I have now been asked and answered this question four times. Individual assistance programs are not impacted."

Exposing the Media's Agenda

Instead of reporting the facts, these reporters repeated the same misleading question over and over in an attempt to frame Trump’s fiscal responsibility as an attack on vulnerable communities. Even after Leavitt made it crystal clear that direct assistance programs are unaffected, they refused to accept reality and continued fearmongering.

Why This Pause is Necessary

President Trump was elected to stop government waste and restore fiscal sanity. Under Biden, taxpayer money was funneled into:

• Radical DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) programs
• Climate change social engineering (Green New Deal-style projects)
• Foreign aid to nations that refuse to cooperate with U.S. immigration policies
• NGOs facilitating illegal immigration

This pause is a responsible and temporary measure to ensure that taxpayer dollars go toward America First policies rather than being squandered on leftist pet projects.

The Reality: Trump is Restoring Fiscal Responsibility

The truth is simple:

1. No one is losing Social Security, Medicare, or food assistance.
2. The pause is temporary and allows for program review—not permanent cuts.
3. Trump is ensuring taxpayer money isn’t wasted on radical leftist policies.

The real scandal here isn't Trump's funding pause—it's the media’s deliberate effort to mislead the public by manufacturing panic where none is warranted. Instead of acknowledging the administration’s reasonable approach to fiscal responsibility, they would rather stoke fear and push their preferred narrative.

President Trump is keeping his promise to drain the swamp and hold the federal bureaucracy accountable—and that's exactly why the media is panicking.