the Conservative TAKE
Politics • Culture • News
the Conservative TAKE is a #MAGA site/channel that gives a conservative take on pop culture & politics.

We do not take ourselves too seriously. We simply want to create great, creative content & to have fun doing it.

One of our core missions is to allow people to think critically by presenting information in a larger context. This includes TV/Movie/Sports reviews & reactions, history lessons, politics and pop culture.

"Destroying the w0kE Narrative"

John 14:6
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Was Khafre’s Pyramid Buried by Time? A Biblical Perspective on Ancient Egyptian Ruins

Some researchers and independent historians have proposed a striking idea: that parts of the Giza complex—particularly the Great Sphinx and structures associated with Pharaoh Khafre—were not originally built underground, but rather stood on the surface and were later buried by sediment and sand over time. While this theory challenges traditional archaeological interpretations, it raises a compelling question: can this be reconciled with the biblical worldview? And could the evidence of buried monuments actually confirm the truth of Scripture?

Ancient Ruins and Shifting Sands
Geologically, it is plausible that once-visible structures in Egypt could have been gradually buried over time. The Egyptian desert is an ever-changing environment. Sand accumulation, Nile flooding (before the construction of the Aswan Dam), and climate fluctuations could have easily covered lower portions of temples, roads, and even portions of pyramids. The Great Sphinx, for example, was buried up to its neck in sand for most of recorded history, and only fully excavated in the modern era.

Khafre’s pyramid itself contains a unique feature: a chamber carved directly into the bedrock. Unlike the standard construction of limestone blocks, this chamber suggests it was either intended to be subterranean or became subterranean over time due to sedimentation. What’s especially intriguing is the presence of water erosion on the Sphinx enclosure—something observed by geologist Robert Schoch. These patterns are not consistent with mere wind erosion; they point to massive and sustained rainfall, which Egypt has not experienced in thousands of years. If accurate, this would place the origin of these structures far earlier than mainstream timelines suggest—potentially aligning with the time of Noah’s Flood or shortly after.

The Flood and the Burial of Civilization
From a biblical standpoint, this theory fits remarkably well. Scripture tells us in Genesis 7:19–20 (KJV): “And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered. Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.” The Flood was not a local event—it was global and catastrophic, covering every mountain and reshaping the entire surface of the earth.

If any structures existed before the Flood, they would have been destroyed, eroded, or deeply buried under sediment. This would also explain the rapid burial of structures that were above ground. More likely, however, these ancient monuments were constructed after the Flood, as humanity repopulated and spread across the earth following the Tower of Babel (Genesis 11). The Giza Plateau, then, would have become a prime location for early post-Flood civilizations to build monuments reflecting the strength, creativity, and intelligence of man made in God’s image (Genesis 1:27).

As creation apologists like Ken Ham and Dr. Jason Lisle often emphasize, ancient people were not primitive brutes evolving from apes—they were fully human from the beginning, with the intellect and ability to construct complex architectural wonders shortly after the Flood.

Could Khafre’s Pyramid Have Been Taller?
If the question is whether the pyramid itself lost vertical height due to burial, that's unlikely. Khafre’s pyramid still retains its upper casing stones and much of its original height. However, surrounding features—like temples, causeways, and entrance passages—could easily have been partially buried over time. Between post-Flood climate changes, wind-driven sand, and geological shifts, structures that once stood fully exposed may now appear sunken or semi-subterranean.

In the biblical timeline, these developments are not only possible—they’re expected. A young earth, shaped by the judgment of the Flood and repopulated by intelligent post-Babel societies, provides a consistent framework for understanding the rise of early empires like Egypt.

A Biblical Framework Makes Sense of the Evidence
The idea that ancient monuments like those at Giza were once fully exposed and later buried does not contradict the Bible—it actually affirms it. The global Flood described in Genesis would have caused exactly the kind of massive sediment displacement and erosion we see evidence of today. Instead of viewing these buried ruins as relics of a mysterious and forgotten past, we can understand them as echoes of real history—history that matches the record God has already given us in His Word.

As we continue to explore and uncover the ancient world, we should do so with Scripture in one hand and the evidence in the other—remembering that both ultimately come from the same Author.

Key Scriptures:

Genesis 7:19–20 – The global extent of the Flood

Genesis 11:1–9 – The dispersion from Babel

Genesis 1:27 – Man created in the image of God

For those interested in going deeper, the works of Ken Ham, Dr. Jason Lisle, and others in the field of biblical creation apologetics provide helpful resources for understanding how archaeology and Scripture go hand in hand.


Books:

“The Genesis Record” by Dr. Henry M. Morris

A comprehensive verse-by-verse commentary on Genesis from a creationist perspective. Morris lays out how the Flood would have impacted geology, sediment layers, and early civilizations.

“Already Gone” by Ken Ham and Britt Beemer

While more focused on worldview and church trends, this book includes solid reasoning for trusting the early chapters of Genesis and how that impacts our understanding of history and archaeology.

“Taking Back Astronomy” by Dr. Jason Lisle

Offers powerful insights into how we interpret historical and scientific evidence—including archaeological findings—based on presuppositions. It’s great for understanding why secular dating methods often conflict with biblical history.

“Unwrapping the Pharaohs” by David Down and John Ashton

This is directly tied to biblical Egyptology. It explores how Egyptian history fits into the biblical timeline, including discussions on monuments like the pyramids.

“The Lie: Evolution” by Ken Ham

A foundational work for understanding how secular assumptions distort our interpretation of scientific and historical data.

Articles and Journals:

"The Sphinx Controversy: Geology vs. Egyptology" – Answers in Genesis (AiG)

Discusses the water erosion evidence and how it supports a post-Flood framework for Egyptian monuments.

"Was There Really a Noah’s Flood?" – Institute for Creation Research (ICR)

Breaks down geological and archaeological evidence for a global flood in plain terms.

“Towers, Temples and Timeframes” – Creation Magazine

An excellent article explaining how early post-Flood civilizations rapidly built complex structures and how this aligns with the Babel dispersion.

"A New Chronology for Egypt" – Journal of Creation (formerly TJ)

This academic-level article reevaluates the Egyptian timeline to better fit the biblical record, offering alternatives to the standard chronology.

“The Pyramids: Monumental Testimony to Man’s Ingenuity” – Creation Magazine

Explores how the construction of the pyramids shows advanced post-Flood intelligence and design, not evolutionary progression.

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Odds of Love: A Probability Study Proving Jasmine Crockett’s Race Baiting Ignores the Real Challenges of Finding a Conservative Black Match

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Representative Jasmine Crockett’s recent criticism of Representative Byron Donalds for marrying a white woman highlights a regressive mindset steeped in ignorance and racial bias, casting doubt on her ability to engage with the diverse realities of American life.

https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1906302926571618409

By implying that Donalds has been “whitewashed” through his interracial marriage, Crockett clings to outdated stereotypes that dictate racial loyalty over personal agency, exposing her own hypocrisy in advocating for equality while policing others’ private choices. This narrow perspective stands in stark contrast to the evolving dynamics of relationships across racial lines, as evidenced by a probabilistic analysis of partner selection among conservative Black individuals. To illustrate the complexity of such dynamics, consider the following study estimating the likelihood of a conservative Black man finding and marrying a conservative Black woman who aligns with his values—a scenario Crockett might deem more “acceptable,” yet one fraught with its own...

00:00:46
00:01:20
Biblical Citizenship in Modern America Commentary Ep14 - Understanding the Times 3

00:00 Introduction
02:03 Week 13 review
04:56 Our Current Education System
05:59 Six Verbs for Advancing Truth in the Country
09:08 What Our Elected Officials Don't Know About America
10:44 The Foundation of Law
12:12 Who Were the Signers of the Declaration of Independence?
13:52 Benjamin Rush
15:44 What is Patriotism?
18:34 Summary of Workbook

00:25:36
Two Roles That Defined Masculine Loyalty: Val Kilmer’s Iceman and Holliday

Val Kilmer didn’t just play characters. He embodied codes; the kind passed down in silence, between glances, through action. And if there’s one virtue that stitched together his most iconic roles, it was loyalty, not loud, not performative, but the kind that men recognize and respect without needing to say a word.

Two roles in particular stand as monuments to that virtue: Iceman in Top Gun and Doc Holliday in Tombstone. Both men on-screen, and Kilmer off it, lived by a simple creed: stand by your brother, especially when it’s hard.

Iceman: The Unshakable Wingman
In Top Gun (1986), Iceman is introduced as Maverick’s rival cool, calculated, and by-the-book. But beneath the mirrored aviators and tension on the tarmac, there’s a deeper thread. Iceman isn’t competing just to win, he’s competing to uphold a standard. A standard that values discipline, trust, and above all, the man next to you in the cockpit.

By Top Gun: Maverick (2022), that bond has aged, weathered, and deepened. Kilmer’s Iceman is...

post photo preview
Remember When Biden Boasted About Defying the Supreme Court, and the Media Barely Reacted?

In December 2023, President Biden openly acknowledged that despite the Supreme Court blocking his initial student loan forgiveness plan, he proceeded to relieve the debt for millions, stating, "The Supreme Court ruled against me, but I still got 136 million people's debt relieved." ​

This bold assertion of executive action in the face of a Supreme Court decision received minimal scrutiny from major media outlets, raising questions about the balance of power and the role of the press in holding leaders accountable.


Remember When Biden Bragged About Defying SCOTUS And Corporate Media Shrugged?
https://thefederalist.com/2025/03/17/remember-when-biden-bragged-about-defying-scotus-and-corporate-media-shrugged/

Biden v. Nebraska – Supreme Court case that struck down President Biden's student loan forgiveness program: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biden_v._Nebraska

Higher Education Relief Opportunities For Students (HEROES) Act – ...

post photo preview
The Constitutional Invalidity of Biden’s Auto-Penned Pardons Under United States v. Throckmorton

I. Introduction
President Donald J. Trump’s recent statement raises serious constitutional and legal concerns regarding President Joe Biden’s use of the Autopen to issue pardons. Specifically, President Trump argues that these pardons are void because they were not personally reviewed, signed, or authorized by Biden himself. This claim finds support in foundational constitutional principles and judicial precedent, including the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Throckmorton (1878), which establishes that fraud vitiates all transactions.

This paper analyzes the constitutional and legal grounds for voiding such pardons under originalist principles, the non-delegable nature of the presidential pardon power, and the application of Throckmorton to executive fraud.

II. The Pardon Power and Its Constitutional Limitations
The presidential pardon power derives from Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution:

“[The President] shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, ...

post photo preview
post photo preview
7 Reasons the GOP Is Winning Big — Even After the Wisconsin Setback

The recent loss in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court race stung, no doubt but the bigger picture tells a vastly different story. Far from being a sign of weakness, it was a wake-up call for targeted action in one battleground state, while the GOP racks up win after win elsewhere. As Dr. Steve Turley laid out, Republicans are winning the war, even if we lost a battle in Wisconsin. Here's why the conservative movement is still surging and why the Democrats should be worried.

1. 6 of 9 Special Elections: GOP Dominates Post-Trump Announcement

Since President Trump declared his candidacy on November 5, the GOP has won 6 out of 9 special elections nationwide. These weren’t minor races, they spanned congressional and state levels, reinforcing that the MAGA coalition is alive and thriving.

Turley calls it like it is: “We’re the Super Bowl champs. We just lost a scrimmage game.” That perspective matters: big picture, the Right is still ahead on the scoreboard.

2. Florida Is Now Deep Red – Massive Wins, Even with Low Turnout

In two special congressional elections, Republicans Randy Fine and Jimmy Patronis won by double digits, even as turnout was down by 60% from the November general.

Democrats threw more than $10 million at these races and still lost badly. Florida, once the quintessential swing state, has become solidly Republican thanks to the post-COVID “leftugees” who fled blue-state lockdowns.

The message from Florida? Republicans are winning without needing high turnout—imagine what happens with it.

3. Wisconsin Loss Masks a Huge Conservative Victory: Voter ID Amendment PASSES

Yes, Brad Schimel lost the Supreme Court race but Wisconsin voters passed a constitutional amendment to require voter ID, and they passed it overwhelmingly: 60% support.

Even Elon Musk called it “the most important vote of the night.” Why? Because voter ID has long-term implications that go beyond any single race. Polls consistently show that 60–80% of voters across both parties support voter ID laws. And now, in Wisconsin, that’s locked into their constitution.

This is a foundational win. With voter ID secured, future elections in Wisconsin just got harder for Democrats to manipulate.

4. Understanding the Wisconsin Shift and What It Means

While Wisconsin has swung back and forth in presidential elections, off-year and state-level races have trended center-left. Why?

  • Mass GOP voter exodus: Many conservatives left the state during COVID.

  • No partisan early vote tracking: Unlike Florida, Wisconsin doesn’t report partisan ballot returns.

  • Low GOP turnout: Rural conservatives didn’t show up.

  • Dem + Independent alignment: Swing voters moved heavily left in this race.

Still, conservatives won on the core issue, voter ID, and that’s what will matter long-term. Plus, the 2024 presidential turnout will be a different game entirely, with Trump on the ballot.

5. Building the Machine: GOTV Must Be the Focus

Turley echoed what strategists like Rich Baris and Scott Presler have said for years: the GOP must build state-level ground games to turn out the new Republican base. Today’s GOP is the party of low-propensity voters, the same working-class folks Democrats used to rely on.

That means:

  • Investing in ballot chasing where legal

  • Building state GOP turnout machines

  • Targeting independents with winning national issues (like voter ID, border security, inflation)

Until that infrastructure is in place, off-year elections like Wisconsin will remain vulnerable. But the momentum and coalition strength are clearly on the GOP’s side.

6. Grassroots Leaders Like Scott Presler Are Filling the Ground Game Gap

While some state GOP organizations still lag behind, conservative grassroots leaders are stepping up and doing the work. Scott Presler has become a household name for his relentless voter registration, door-knocking, and turnout efforts. But he’s not doing it alone. Cliff Maloney is mobilizing liberty-minded youth through Young Americans for Liberty, while Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point Action is building state-by-state infrastructure aimed at ballot harvesting where legal and getting out the vote. These grassroots patriots are filling the void left by weak GOP machines and they’re proving that the conservative movement doesn’t need permission from party elites to win.

7. The Blueprint for 2024 Is Already Working

Here’s what conservatives should take away:

  • 6 of 9 special elections won

  • Voter ID wins in a swing state

  • Ballot security measures in general like voter ID are gaining traction
  • Florida is locked in deep red

  • Democrats wasting millions on failed races

  • GOP coalition stronger than ever

  • National issues like inflation, border security, and parental rights dominate the conversation

The Wisconsin loss was a setback but also a signal. A strong national agenda and a Trump-led ticket will bring conservatives back out in force. Add in a functional ground game, and the path to victory becomes clear.

Final Word: We’re Still the Champs

The Wisconsin court race was a reminder, not a defeat. With voter ID locked into law, 6 special election wins under our belt, and deep-red strongholds like Florida holding firm, the GOP has every reason to be confident.

This is the moment to regroup, organize, and push harder—not panic.

We’re still the champs. Let’s act like it.

The White House

 

Read full Article
Stunning Surge: Media Reels as Trump’s Favorability Defies Political Gravity

The political establishment is stunned. The legacy media is scrambling. And the polling class? They’re quietly panicking.

In a development few thought possible, Donald J. Trump is not just surviving the political gauntlet of 2024 — he’s thriving. According to Rich Baris, the most accurate pollster of the last election cycle, Trump is experiencing a level of sustained approval and favorability that’s defying political precedent and sending shockwaves through both parties.

Trump’s Approval Defies the Odds

Despite relentless legal attacks, media smears, and a deeply polarized nation, Trump’s approval rating sits between +2 to +4 net positive, with a recent private poll landing at +3. At his peak, Baris notes, Trump soared to an astounding +18 during his "honeymoon phase" after announcing his return to the political arena.

“This is unprecedented,” said Baris. “For any Republican president (let alone a political outsider like Trump) to maintain this kind of sustained approval is almost unthinkable.”

A Favorability Flip That Has Democrats Rattled

Even more stunning is a historic inversion in Trump’s numbers. For the first time, Trump’s favorability now slightly exceeds his approval rating, a reversal of the long-standing dynamic where voters might approve of his job performance but express personal disdain.

“This tells us something seismic is happening,” explained Baris. “Not only are people acknowledging his effectiveness, they’re beginning to like him and that is a nightmare scenario for Democrats.”

The Reluctant Voter: Still Trump’s Trump Card

For years, Trump has wielded a rare political advantage: the ability to win over voters who don’t personally like him but vote for him anyway. Baris estimates 10–15% of Trump’s support comes from voters in this category — the so-called “reluctant voters.”

“They’ll tell you, ‘I can’t stand the tweets,’ or ‘I don’t like the way he talks,’” said Baris. “But then they say, ‘He was a damn good president.’ That pragmatic loyalty has always been his secret weapon.”

A Realignment in Real Time

Baris and Turley highlighted what appears to be an ongoing massive political realignment. Key demographic groups, once solidly Democratic, are breaking toward Trump in numbers that would’ve been unthinkable just a few cycles ago.

Among the shifts:

  • Young men under 35, especially Gen Z males, are now among Trump’s most favorable age brackets.

  • Black and Hispanic voters, particularly men, are showing consistent erosion in support for Democrats and a growing openness to Trump’s populist message.

  • Working-class and non-white voters, disillusioned with Democratic leadership, are resonating more with Trump’s rhetoric of national strength, economic opportunity, and cultural tradition.

Trump’s alignment with figures like Elon Musk and his resonance in influencer and tech culture has also helped shift perceptions among younger voters, many of whom no longer look to Hollywood or legacy media for guidance.

GOP Struggles to Harness Trump’s Momentum

While Trump’s political engine is running full throttle, the GOP’s infrastructure is still sputtering. In Pennsylvania’s 36th district (which Trump carried by 15 points) Republicans lost a recent special election, a defeat Baris blames squarely on local party incompetence.

“There’s MAGA energy out there,” he said. “But the Republican Party isn’t always capable or even willing to harness it.”

He praised Florida and North Carolina as models of MAGA-oriented party governance, singling out Michael Whatley (newly elevated within the RNC) as someone who “gets it.”

Polling Establishment in Collapse

Baris also took a victory lap at the expense of legacy polling outfits like FiveThirtyEight, which has collapsed under new leadership. He slammed what he calls the “election mafia”, a club of pollsters who reward consensus over accuracy and penalize independent analysts like himself for breaking with the narrative.

“They gave me an R+7 lean just because I wasn’t off by seven points to the left like everyone else,” said Baris. “They punish you for being right if it goes against their ideology.”

Turnout Trends Turning Upside Down

In a dramatic shift, high voter turnout is no longer a guaranteed win for Democrats. In states like Wisconsin, red counties are showing turnout spikes, and it’s not clear Democrats can make up the difference.

“Normies are voting,” Baris quipped. “And normal people are Republicans now.”

He noted that low-propensity voters, once the core of Democrat victories, are increasingly outnumbered by consistent Trump-aligned voters who are turning out in bigger and bigger numbers.

Conclusion: The Realignment is Real

What we’re witnessing may be one of the most consequential political shifts in American history. Trump is attracting not just Republicans, but moderates, independents, young men, and minorities, the very groups Democrats long considered their firewall.

“This isn’t a statistical blip,” Baris insisted. “It’s a political realignment.”

And if it continues, the media’s long-held assumptions (about voter behavior, about demographics, about Donald Trump himself) are not just wrong. They’re obsolete.

Read full Article
post photo preview
How Disney's 2025 Snow White Rewrites a Biblical Allegory into a Socialist Manifesto
UPDATED - 3/31/25 8:24am EST

Walt Disney’s 1937 Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs wasn’t just an animation milestone, it was a modern retelling of a timeless fairy tale with moral clarity and spiritual resonance. Based on the Grimm brothers' 1812 version (Sneewittchen), the story drew deeply from the Christian worldview that shaped Europe for centuries. Though softened for mass appeal, the 1937 film retained core values: innocence, sacrifice, love, and resurrection.

Fast forward to the recent 2025 remake, and we’re no longer just watching an updated fairytale; we're watching an ideological revision. The shift is dramatic: from a Christ-centered allegory of redemption to a secular manifesto preaching autonomy, class struggle, and collectivist ideals.

This is not accidental. It is part of a broader cultural movement to replace biblical truth with secular humanism, and to reshape the moral imagination of an entire generation.

The Original Tale: Rooted in Christian Symbolism

The Grimm version, and even Disney’s 1937 film, reflects a world where God, sin, death, and redemption still meant something.

Biblical Symbolism in Snow White:

  • Snow White’s Appearance — Her skin “white as snow, lips red as blood, hair black as ebony” echoes Isaiah 1:18 KJV: “though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow.” Her image embodies purity, sacrifice, and death which are core gospel themes.

  • The Three Deaths and Resurrection — Snow White "dies" three times: bodice, comb, and apple. This mirrors temptation, bondage, and spiritual death (Genesis 3:6; Romans 6:23 KJV), followed by resurrection, a shadow of Christ’s Passion.

  • The Dwarfs as Monastic Figures — Seven laboring men, living apart from society in ordered community, caring for a "sacred" woman; they resemble monks or the early church caring for the body of Christ (Acts 2:42–47 KJV).

  • The Evil Queen as Satanic Archetype — Driven by vanity and envy, she reflects Lucifer's fall: “I will exalt my throne above the stars of God…” (Isaiah 14:13 KJV). Her end is just and mirrors divine judgment.

  • The Prince as Christ — He awakens Snow White with a kiss: life restored by love. “I am the resurrection, and the life…” (John 11:25 KJV). He represents not a mere romantic interest but a redeemer-king figure.

Enter the 2025 Remake: From Resurrection to Revolution

Instead of preserving these themes, the 2025 remake (based on cast interviews, production leaks, and previews) strips the story of its moral clarity and spiritual resonance. What remains is not a tale of virtue overcoming evil but one of class struggle, autonomy, and empowerment divorced from truth.


This remake is not a simple modernization—it’s a reprogramming.

The Woman at the Well vs. the New Snow White: A Tale of Two Messages

There’s no better biblical counterpoint to the 2025 Snow White than the woman at the well in John 4. She, like modern Snow White, lived outside the boundaries of traditional virtue. She was assertive, independent and empty. Jesus doesn’t applaud her autonomy. He confronts her sin and offers living water, eternal life through Him (John 4:14 KJV).

“Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again: But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst…”
John 4:13–14 KJV

She doesn’t “find herself.” She meets the Messiah. She doesn’t overthrow oppressive systems. She abandons her jar (John 4:28 KJV) and tells others about Christ (John 4:29 KJV).

Today’s Snow White is being rewritten to preach a secular gospel: “You are enough. You define truth. You don’t need saving.” But the woman at the well shows us the real gospel: “You are not enough, but Christ is.”

Secular Humanism, Collectivism, and the Gospel of Self

The 2025 remake aligns with the rising tide of secular humanism, where man is god, morality is fluid, and salvation comes through political revolution or self-actualization. Instead of sin, we’re told we’re victims. Instead of redemption, we get redistribution. Instead of a Savior, we get a slogan.

This isn’t just misguided storytelling, it’s theological subversion.

As Dr. Jason Lisle teaches, when you reject the absolute authority of Scripture, you lose the foundation for truth itself. Ken Ham has shown how evolution and humanism displace God from the cultural conversation. Gary Habermas reminds us that the resurrection is not just a doctrine, it’s a worldview. And Lee Strobel has demonstrated that if you remove Christ from history, you remove hope from humanity.

The 2025 Snow White is a case study in all of this. It’s not just “woke.” It’s a moral and spiritual inversion.

What We Lose When We Trade the Prince for the Proletariat

This remake doesn’t just remove the Prince, it replaces him. With what? A vague message of empowerment, wealth sharing, anti-hierarchy, and collectivist virtue. It exchanges love for labor. It dethrones the Savior and enthrones the self.

But in doing so, it teaches children that there is no rescue. No grace. No sin to repent of, and no heaven to hope for. Just struggle, identity politics, and perpetual dissatisfaction.

It’s not Snow White. It’s a fable rewritten in the language of Marx.

In the end... We Don’t Need a New Snow White; We Need the Old Gospel

The 1937 Snow White still points upward: to beauty, to sacrifice, to love that triumphs over death. The 2025 remake turns inward, downward, and backward. What began as a tale of resurrection now ends in a revolution of self.

But we don’t need another story telling us to save ourselves. We need the truth that Christ alone saves.

Just like the woman at the well, our culture is thirsty. Disney offers them polluted water. Christ offers living water.

And like Snow White in her glass coffin, this generation lies poisoned and asleep and waiting for a Prince not of this world.

Snow White's prince redeemer (1937)

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals